Haspelmath (2007): Coordination — structural typology #
[Has07] [Sta00] [Noo92] [Sch89] [Row69] [Sri90] [Den95] [Bey92] [Kor97]
Martin Haspelmath. "Coordination." In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II, ed. T. Shopen, 2007.
Cross-linguistic typology of coordination — restricted here to conjunctive coordination. The chapter as a whole covers four semantic types (conjunction, disjunction, adversative, causal) plus emphatic and emphatic-negative variants; the formalisation below engages only conjunction (§1 Types and positions of coordinators, §5.1 Diachronic sources). Disjunction (§4), adversative, causal, ellipsis (§6), and subordination diagnostics (§7) are out of scope.
The companion file Studies/MitrovicSauerland2016.lean consumes the
language sample below to formalise the J-μ predictions; the iso and
patterns data sets are shared.
Main declarations #
allLanguages— 19-language sample (Haspelmath structural exemplars + M&S focus languages).msLanguages— M&S-focused sub-sample of 7 languages; consumed byMitrovicSauerland2016.lean.coAB_unattested— Haspelmath's structural generalisation that the monosyndetic patternco-A B(prepositive on first coordinand only) is typologically absent (cf. [Sta00], n=260).comitative_source_monosyndetic,focus_particle_source_bisyndetic— the two diachronic-source / syndesis correlations Haspelmath proposes in §5.1.
Implementation notes #
- Records use the
ConjunctionSystemstruct fromTypology/Coordination.lean. All morphemes reference Fragment entries except for Slovenian (in) and Martuthunira (-thurti), which remain inline since the project has noFragments/{Slovenian,Martuthunira}/directory and creating one for a single morpheme is overkill. - Pattern data follow the cited primary sources, not the M&S analyses layered on top — e.g., Turkish de is monosyndetic postpositive per [Has07] (23), not bisyndetic.
M&S focus languages #
English only has J ("and"). "Both...and" is sometimes analyzed as J-MU, but "both" is not productively used as an additive particle ("John both slept") and English lacks MU-only conjunction ("John both Mary both slept").
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
German uses "und" (J, free word), like English "and". J-only strategy.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Japanese conjunction uses "to" (J) and "mo" (MU). "to" derives from the comitative marker. "mo" is also the additive particle.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hungarian: "és" (J, free, prepositive), "is" (MU, free, postpositive). "is" is also the additive focus particle ("also"). One of the languages in the M&S 2016 sample exhibiting triadic exponency (all three of two μ heads + J head) — see [MS16] (28).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Georgian: "da" (J, free), "-c" (MU, bound clitic). "-c" is also the additive/focus particle. Classified as exhibiting all three M&S strategies per [Mit21]; [MS16] itself uses SE Macedonian, Hungarian, and Avar as the triadic-exponency languages — Georgian's inclusion here is from the later literature.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Latin: "et" (J, free, prepositive) and "-que" (MU, bound enclitic, postpositive). "-que" is the classic bound MU particle. Three patterns: A et B, A B-que, et A B-que.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Slovenian: "in" (J, free, prepositive). Primarily J-only.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Haspelmath 2007 structural exemplars #
Hindi-Urdu: "aur" (J, free, prepositive) and "bhii" (MU, free, additive). Pattern: A aur B (monosyndetic), A bhii B bhii (bisyndetic postpositive).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Turkish: "ve" (J, free, prepositive) and "de" (MU, bound enclitic, postpositive on first word of second coordinand). Per [Has07] (23) citing [Kor97]:120, de is monosyndetic postpositive (A B-co); de…de bisyndetic also exists as a marked emphatic variant.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Irish: "agus" (J, free, prepositive). Pattern: A agus B (monosyndetic medial).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Persian: "va" (J, free, prepositive) and "ham" (MU, free, additive).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Finnish: "ja" (J, free, prepositive) and "-kin" (MU, bound, additive). koira-kin kissa-kin 'dog-too cat-too' = 'both the dog and the cat'.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Sample bundles #
All 19 ConjunctionSystem profiles.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
M&S focus languages — the sub-sample consumed by
Studies/MitrovicSauerland2016.lean.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Structural / diachronic generalisations #
[Has07]'s key structural generalisation: the monosyndetic
pattern co-A B (prepositive on first coordinand only) is unattested for
conjunction, per [Sta00]'s 260-language sample. Verified over
the 19-language sample via List.contains, which uses the BEq instance
to sidestep ∈'s LawfulBEq requirement.
Every language with a known comitative-sourced morpheme has at least one monosyndetic structural pattern. Confirms: comitative "with" → monosyndetic A co-B / A-co B. Languages: Lango, Hausa, Japanese, Classical Tibetan.
Every language with a known focus-particle-sourced morpheme has at least one bisyndetic structural pattern. Confirms: additive focus particle "also" → bisyndetic A-co B-co. Languages: Japanese, Hungarian, Georgian, Latin, Korean, Kannada.