Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Aikhenvald2004

Aikhenvald (2004): Evidentiality typology #

[Aik04] [dH13b] [Bar84] [Osw86]

This file holds only the analytical disagreements: where [Aik04]'s own paradigm-type letter for a language differs from AikhenvaldSystem.fromInventory applied to the Fragment-declared inventory, or where the resulting classification differs from [dH13b]'s WALS Ch 77 coding.

Per-language Aikhenvald classifications are derived in Typology/Evidentiality.lean; per-language inventories live in Fragments/{Lang}/Evidentiality.lean. There are no per-language verification examples here — those would be unit tests of the derivation algorithm, not theorems about the typology.

Disagreements recorded #

Evidentiality typology (consolidated from the former Typology/Modality + Typology/Evidentiality; single-paper [Aik04] apparatus) #

WALS Ch 77: how many evidential distinctions a language grammaticalises. Extends the WALS 3-way classification with a threeOrMore value to distinguish Quechua/Tuyuca-style rich systems from canonical 2-way systems (Turkish/Bulgarian).

  • noGrammatical : EvidentialSystem

    No grammatical evidentials (e.g. English, French, Mandarin).

  • indirectOnly : EvidentialSystem

    Indirect evidential only (e.g. Georgian, West Greenlandic).

  • directAndIndirect : EvidentialSystem

    Two-choice direct vs indirect (e.g. Turkish, Bulgarian, Tibetan, Abkhaz).

  • threeOrMore : EvidentialSystem

    Three or more evidential choices (e.g. Quechua, Tuyuca, Aymara, Tariana).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      WALS Ch 78: how evidentiality is morphologically expressed.

      • verbalAffix : EvidentialCoding

        Evidential is a verbal affix or clitic (bound morpheme). Dominant strategy worldwide (131/418 in WALS Ch 78).

      • clitic : EvidentialCoding

        Evidential is a clitic (phrasal-level, not strictly verbal).

      • particle : EvidentialCoding

        Evidential is a free separate particle (65/418).

      • partOfTAM : EvidentialCoding

        Evidential distinctions fused into the TAM paradigm.

      • notApplicable : EvidentialCoding

        Not applicable: language has no grammatical evidentials.

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

          WALS Ch 77 lookup by ISO 639-3 code. none for languages WALS doesn't cover. Used by Aikhenvald-vs-WALS divergence theorems.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            [Aik04] Ch 2 paradigm system-type classification. The letter encodes term count (A=2, B=3, C=4, D=5); the digit encodes paradigm shape.

            • A1 : AikhenvaldSystem

              A1: Firsthand vs Non-firsthand. The most common 2-term type (Cherokee, Jarawara, Yukaghir, Tibetan). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.1.1.

            • A2 : AikhenvaldSystem

              A2: Non-firsthand vs 'everything else'. The single marked term covers inference and report. Common in Turkic and Caucasian languages (Turkish, Abkhaz, Hunzib). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.1.1.

            • A3 : AikhenvaldSystem

              A3: Reported (or 'hearsay') vs 'everything else'. The single marked term is the reportative. Widespread (Lezgian, Estonian, Enga, Kham, many North American Indian languages). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.1.1.

            • A4 : AikhenvaldSystem

              A4: Sensory evidence and Reported. Both terms marked (Ngiyambaa, Diyari, Lakondê/Latundê, reduced Wintu). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.1.1.

            • A5 : AikhenvaldSystem

              A5: Auditory vs 'everything else'. Attested only in Euchee. Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.1.1.

            • B1 : AikhenvaldSystem

              B1: Direct (or Visual) + Inferred + Reported. The most common 3-term system. The Quechua family (-mi, -chi, -shi), Wanka Quechua, Shasta, Amdo Tibetan, Qiang, Mosetén. Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.2.

            • B2 : AikhenvaldSystem

              B2: Visual + Non-visual sensory + Inferred. No reportative. Rare (Washo, Siona). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.2.

            • B3 : AikhenvaldSystem

              B3: Visual + Non-visual sensory + Reported. No inferential. Oksapmin, Maricopa, Dulong. Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.2.

            • B4 : AikhenvaldSystem

              B4: Non-visual sensory + Inferred + Reported. Visual is unmarked default (Nganasan, Enets, Retuarã). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.2.

            • B5 : AikhenvaldSystem

              B5: Reported + Quotative + 'everything else'. Two distinct reported-type evidentials, similar to A3 with quotative split (Comanche, Dakota, Tonkawa). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.2.

            • C1 : AikhenvaldSystem

              C1: Visual + Non-visual sensory + Inferred + Reported. The most common 4-term system; East Tucanoan languages (Tucano, Barasano, Tatuyo, Siriano, Macuna), Eastern Pomo, traditional Tariana. Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.3.

            • C2 : AikhenvaldSystem

              C2: Direct (or Visual) + Inferred + Assumed + Reported. The sensory may be just visual (Tsafiki, Shipibo-Konibo, Pawnee, Mamainde). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.3.

            • C3 : AikhenvaldSystem

              C3: Direct + Inferred + Reported + Quotative. Two distinct reportative types (Cora, Northern Embera, SE Tepehuan). Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.3.

            • D1 : AikhenvaldSystem

              D1: Visual + Non-visual sensory + Inferred + Assumed + Reported. The classical 5-term system: current Tariana, Tuyuca, Desano, traditional Wintu. Kashaya is comparable but distinguishes auditory within non-visual. Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.4.

            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Projection to the WALS Ch 77 ([dH13b]) classification, extended with threeOrMore. A-systems map per their direct/indirect coverage; B/C/D map uniformly to .threeOrMore. WALS itself collapses B/C/D into .directAndIndirect; the .threeOrMore extension is linglib's, preserving Aikhenvald's richer typology (see Typology/Modality.lean and Aikhenvald 2004 Ch 2 §2.2).

                Equations
                Instances For
                  @[simp]

                  The Aikhenvald typology is always richer-or-equal to the WALS one: .threeOrMore for all 3+-term systems (B/C/D), the appropriate 2-way value for 2-term systems (A).

                  Derivation from a typed inventory #

                  Derive [Aik04]'s paradigm system-type letter from a declared inventory by inspecting which cells of her paradigm space are covered. Mirrors Determiner.markingStrategy's derivation pattern. Returns none for inventories whose cell pattern doesn't fit any standard A–D letter; per-paper editorial overrides for such cases live in the relevant Studies/AuthorYear.lean.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Worked examples documenting the API #

                    §1. Paper-vs-derived disagreements #

                    [Aik04]'s own letter assignment for the four sample languages where it differs from AikhenvaldSystem.fromInventory:

                    Aikhenvald 2004's own letter for the four divergent languages. none for any language whose derivation matches the paper.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      §2. Aikhenvald-vs-WALS disagreements #

                      Representative cases — same structural pattern repeats across the other indirectOnly-via-modal cases (German, Korean, Finnish) and the other WALS-lumps-rich-systems cases (Tariana, Kashaya).

                      Empty inventory per Aikhenvald-strict vs WALS indirectOnly. French is the canonical case: the journalistic conditional has reportative use that WALS counts but Aikhenvald excludes. Same pattern holds for German, Japanese, Korean, Finnish.

                      The signature divergence: Tuyuca's D1 5-term system per Aikhenvald (projecting to threeOrMore) vs WALS's directAndIndirect lump. Same paradigm, two classifications, both kernel-verified.

                      Andean B1: Aikhenvald has classification; WALS has no entry.

                      Turkish: derivation's A1 happens to project to the same WALS coding (directAndIndirect) WALS assigns directly; the Aikhenvald paper A2 projects to indirectOnly. Triple-comparison divergence.