Kashaya evidentiality #
Kashaya (Pomoan, northern California) marks the source of the speaker's information with a
paradigm of verbal suffixes, which Oswalt lays out in his Table 1 and which Aikhenvald sets
beside the five-choice systems as a complex system with further terms.
The rows of the table are the evidentials, top down in the order of Oswalt's hierarchy of
preference; its columns are the modes of speech. A spontaneous remark, prompted by the event
itself, makes the finest distinctions: the performative pair -ŵela -mela, the speaker
performing or having just performed the act, so that the subject is first person; the
factual-visual pair -ŵă -yă, the speaker seeing or having seen it, the imperfective
factual also stating general truths and common knowledge; the auditory -V̂nnă, the sound of
the action heard but not seen; inferential I -qă, inference from evidence found apart from the
event; and the quotative -do, information learned from someone else. The performative and the
factual-visual are complementary pairs selected by the aspect of the stem, the imperfective
member for imperfective stems and the perfective for perfective ones, an aspectless stem taking
either. A response to another's words adds the suffix -m and drops the performative, the
factual-visual pair taking its place. The narrative construction, with the evidential on the
assertive enclitic and the main verb in the absolutive, collapses all direct evidence to the
personal experience -yowă against the quotative, and the archaic remote past -miyă marks
personal experience in an irretrievable past. Inferential II -bi- is never verb-final: it
precedes a subordinating suffix, the absolutive or another evidential, so it stands outside the
mutually exclusive paradigm. WALS codes the language as having direct and indirect evidentials
(Feature 77A).
Implementation notes #
The forms are Oswalt's morphophonemic suffixes in Aikhenvald's typography, ŵ an initial that surfaces only after a vowel, V̂ a vowel determined by the preceding consonant and ă a final vowel that is zero before a word boundary. The performative covers none of Aikhenvald's six parameters: its source, the speaker's own act, lies outside them. The general truths the factual states are general knowledge cast in the visual, an extension of its coverage rather than a parameter of its own. The six parameters cannot split hearing from the other senses, so the auditory carries the whole non-visual sensory parameter although Oswalt notes that smell and touch fall by default to inferential I.
References #
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.instDecidableEqMode x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.instReprMode = { reprPrec := Kashaya.Evidentiality.instReprMode.repr }
The performative pair -ŵela ~ -mela: the speaker performs or has just performed the act. Its source lies outside the six parameters, so it covers none.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.performative Aspect.Perfectivity.imperfective = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "ŵela"], covers := ∅ }
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.performative Aspect.Perfectivity.perfective = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "mela"], covers := ∅ }
Instances For
The factual-visual pair: the speaker sees or saw the event. The imperfective factual -ŵă also states general truths and common knowledge, general knowledge cast in the visual; the perfective visual -yă does not.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.factualVisual Aspect.Perfectivity.imperfective = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "ŵă"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.visual} }
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.factualVisual Aspect.Perfectivity.perfective = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "yă"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.visual} }
Instances For
The auditory -V̂nnă: the speaker heard the sound of the action but did not see it.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.auditory = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "V̂nnă"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.sensory} }
Instances For
Inferential I -qă: inference from circumstances or evidence found apart, in space or time, from the event.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.inferential = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "qă"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.inference} }
Instances For
The quotative -do: information learned from someone else.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.quotative = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "do"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.hearsay, Evidential.Parameter.quotative} }
Instances For
Inferential II -bi-, which must be followed by another suffix: a subordinator, the absolutive in -biw 'it turned out', the quotative or inferential I.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.inferentialII = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "bi"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.inference} }
Instances For
The personal experience -yowă of the narrative construction, the factual on an element -yo-, which replaces every evidential of direct evidence.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.personalExperience = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "yowă"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.visual, Evidential.Parameter.sensory, Evidential.Parameter.inference} }
Instances For
The archaic remote past -miyă, the visual on an element -mi-: personal experience in an irretrievable past.
Equations
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.remotePast = { morphs := [Morphology.Morph.suff "miyă"], covers := {Evidential.Parameter.visual, Evidential.Parameter.sensory, Evidential.Parameter.inference} }
Instances For
The paradigm of a mode for stems of an aspect is a column of Table 1 read top down, in the order of Oswalt's hierarchy.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.paradigm Kashaya.Evidentiality.Mode.narrative x✝ = [Kashaya.Evidentiality.personalExperience, Kashaya.Evidentiality.quotative]
- Kashaya.Evidentiality.paradigm Kashaya.Evidentiality.Mode.remote x✝ = [Kashaya.Evidentiality.remotePast, Kashaya.Evidentiality.quotative]