Moroney (2021): Definiteness and Quantification — Evidence from Shan #
[Mor21] shows that Shan (Southwestern Tai, Kra-Dai) bare nouns express
both unique and anaphoric definiteness, instantiating an unmarked cell that
[Jen18]'s definiteness typology had no slot for. Because Shan has no
articles, no covert type-shift is blocked — ι, ι^x, and ∩ are all available
to bare nouns — while the optional demonstratives nâj/nân merely add
spatial content. The cell is derived from Shan.Determiners.inventory, the
bare-noun reading distribution from MeaningPreservation.selectShift over
Shan.Nouns.blocking, and the refutation is stated against
Jenks2018.jenksAttestedStrategies.
References #
Bare-noun readings (Table 2.3) #
The five candidate readings of a bare noun.
- lowExistential : BareNounInterp
Low-scope ∃, introduced by Derived Predicate Predication at vP ([Mor21] (85)), hence below negation.
- highExistential : BareNounInterp
Wide-scope ∃ above negation — unavailable to bare nouns, since DPP applies no higher than vP.
- definite : BareNounInterp
Definite, via the ι type-shift.
- kind : BareNounInterp
Kind, via the ∩ type-shift.
- generic : BareNounInterp
Generic, via GEN over situations.
Instances For
Equations
- Moroney2021.instDecidableEqBareNounInterp x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Moroney2021.instReprBareNounInterp = { reprPrec := Moroney2021.instReprBareNounInterp.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
One Table 2.3 row: whether a reading is available to Shan and English count and mass bare nouns.
- interp : BareNounInterp
- shanCount : Bool
- shanMass : Bool
- englishCount : Bool
- englishMass : Bool
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Table 2.3: Shan and English bare nouns share the low-∃, kind, and generic readings, both lack the high-∃ reading, and part ways only on the definite reading.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The definite reading is the sole point where Shan and English bare nouns differ.
Type-shift selection #
The type-shift context of a Shan number-neutral bare noun: nothing is
blocked (Shan.Nouns.blocking), and only the predicate's
kind-compatibility varies.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
With a non-kind predicate a Shan bare noun type-shifts by ι — the definite reading — while an English bare singular gets no shift at all, since the and a block ι and ∃.
With a kind-compatible predicate ∩ is selected while ι and ι^x remain available — the definite/kind ambiguity of Shan bare nouns.
Shan's ι^x is unblocked, so bare nouns reach anaphoric definiteness; blocking ι^x — Thai's demonstrative — removes exactly that reading.
ι outranks ∃ under Meaning Preservation: ∃ is available but never selected when ι is, so Shan bare nouns default to definite or kind readings, and the existential reading arises only through DPP at vP — whence the missing high-∃ row of Table 2.3.
The typology, derived per language (Tables 4.1 and 4.4) #
Each Table 4.4 language's marking strategy, computed by
Determiner.Inventory.markingStrategy from its declared inventory: the
four languages fill all four cells of the revised typology.
The [Sch13]-style article-type projection of the same inventories.
ArticleType is lossy where DefMarkingStrategy is not: English and
Mandarin differ in strategy yet collapse to the same article type.
Shan count nouns are fake-mass nouns (§2.3.1) #
A four-element mereology: dogs a, b, their sum ab, and a leg c
below the sum that is not a dog.
- a : FakeMassEntity
- b : FakeMassEntity
- c : FakeMassEntity
- ab : FakeMassEntity
Instances For
Equations
- Moroney2021.instDecidableEqFakeMassEntity x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Moroney2021.instReprFakeMassEntity = { reprPrec := Moroney2021.instReprFakeMassEntity.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Dogs: the atoms a, b and their sum ab; the leg c is not a dog.
Equations
- Moroney2021.isDog Moroney2021.FakeMassEntity.c = False
- Moroney2021.isDog x✝ = True
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Shan bare count nouns pattern with English furniture-type nouns ([Mor21] §2.3.1): cumulative — the sum of dogs is dogs — but not g-homogeneous, since the leg below the sum has no dog part.
Demonstratives add spatial content (§2.4.3) #
The demonstrative denotation of [Mor21] (147)–(148), a referent
selector with the demonstrative's spatial content added to the
restrictor: ⟦DEM⟧(P) = ιx[P(x) ∧ SPATIAL(x)], where russellIotaList
carries the uniqueness presupposition.
Equations
- Moroney2021.demDenotation domain d restrictor spatialPred = Semantics.Definiteness.russellIotaList domain fun (e : E) => restrictor e && spatialPred d.deictic e
Instances For
The bare definite description is the unfiltered referent selector, the uniqueness-based reading available to Shan bare nouns.
Equations
- Moroney2021.bareDefinite domain restrictor = Semantics.Definiteness.russellIotaList domain restrictor
Instances For
When the bare description selects a referent that satisfies the demonstrative's spatial predicate, the demonstrative selects the same referent, so nâj/nân are optional in such contexts — the bare noun already provides the definite reading via unblocked ι.
Realization: anaphoric definiteness without an anaphoric article #
Shan has no determiner realizing anaphoric definiteness, yet expresses it — through bare nouns (unblocked ι^x) and the optional demonstratives.
Shan does realize the demonstrative kind — the nâj/nân paradigm.
English realizes anaphoric definiteness through syncretic the and German through its dedicated strong article, while Shan has no realizing form at all.
Refuting Jenks's attested-cell prediction #
Shan's derived strategy falls outside [Jen18]'s attested set — the discovery of the fourth, unmarked cell.