Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Lucy1994

Lucy 1994: The role of semantic value in lexical comparison #

[Luc94]

[Luc94] argues that the right way to identify lexical classes is morpho-distributional, not denotational. Yucatek's "spatial" verbs are his test case: a notional set assembled by English intuition fails to coincide with any morphologically defined Yucatek class. What the morphology does deliver is a different, three-way classification of roots by salience profile, derivable from which transitiviser the root requires:

Required transitiviserSalience classExamples
=t (affective)agent-salientsíit' "jump", ¢'iib "write"
=∅ (zero)agent-patient salientkuč "carry", p'is "measure", lo'š "punch"
=s (causative)patient-salientkíim "die", háan "cease", lúub' "fall", 'ok "enter"

Crucially, Lucy's "motion" roots (luub, ok, etc.) do not form a unified class — they pattern with other state-change verbs as patient-salient. What does form a unified class is the positional roots (čin "bend", kul "sit", etc.), distinguished by their derivation via -tal (allomorph -lah) for the positional inchoative.

Here we recast the salience cut as a derived equivalence on roots under the operator inventory in Fragments/Mayan/Yukatek/Operators.lean: two roots have the same salience class iff the same operator(s) apply to them. The classification then falls out of (B&K-G feature signature × Coon root arity) × (operator applicability conditions) — it is not stipulated. Arity carries the agent-patient class (Lucy's =∅ roots "require two arguments"; p'is 'measure' and lo'š 'punch' entail no change of state, so no feature configuration could carry it); the signature separates the two intransitive classes.

The structural theorem class_depends_only_on_signature_and_arity makes this precise: salience class depends only on the pair, not on the specific root identity. The per-root checks then degenerate to finite lookups.

Salience classes (re-exported from theory) #

SalienceClass and classOf live in Semantics/Lexical/Roots/SalienceClass.lean. This file provides the full [Luc94] analysis on top of them: operator-applicability characterizations and per-root sanity checks.

@[reducible, inline]

A root's predicted salience class: the substrate classifier applied to its signature and the fragment's arity assignment.

Equations
Instances For

    Predicted class agrees with operator applicability #

    Both predictedClass and the inventory's applicability profile factor through the pair (kind signature × arity), drawn from a 32-element fintype. Each characterisation therefore reduces — after rewriting the profile to pair level (applicableNames_eq_profile) and generalising the pair — to a statement over all pairs that decide checks. The local macro lucy_applicable packages the reduction.

    The =t-only applicability profile characterises agent-salient roots.

    The =∅-only applicability profile characterises agent-patient salient roots.

    The =s-only applicability profile characterises patient-salient roots.

    The -tal-only applicability profile characterises positional roots.

    An empty applicability profile characterises roots in [Luc94]'s diagnostic gap (the no-manner, no-result signatures other than the pure positional configuration {.state}).

    Applicability-as-classifier. Two roots have the same applicability profile under [Luc94]'s diagnostic inventory iff they have the same predicted salience class. The 4 named-class iff-theorems are special cases.

    Per-root sanity checks #

    Agent-salient.

    Agent-patient salient.

    Patient-salient.

    Motion roots — pattern as patient-salient (Lucy's central point).

    Positional.

    The "motion verbs" non-class #

    [Luc94]'s central typological point: "motion" verbs (luub "fall", ok "enter") are not in their own salience class — they pattern with other patient-salient state-change roots. Concretely: their predicted class is the same as kiim "die".

    Conversely, positional roots do form a unified class distinguishable from any "motion" or state-change root: their predicted class differs from every patient-salient root's.

    Root transitivity is not MRC violation #

    Lucy's root transitives are manner-only roots in B&K-G terms — lexical transitivity does not entail a result. Under the previous schema (agent-patient salience as manner + result) every Yukatek root transitive came out violating Manner/Result Complementarity, contradicting [BKG20]'s finding that manner+result roots are a restricted, special class; hit-type surface-contact roots like lo'š 'punch' are their parade manner-without-result examples.

    Closure robustness #

    The class predicted from a root's closed kind signature (the collocational closure Root.Kinds.close of the derived signature). Arity is closure-invariant.

    Equations
    Instances For

      For cause-free roots, collocational closure does not change the Lucy 1994 salience classification: arity is untouched, the only closure edge that can fire is result→state, the agent / patient arms ignore .state membership, and a base that gains .state from closure carries .result and so is already excluded from the positional arm. The hypothesis is necessary: an intransitive root carrying .cause but not .result is unclassified at base yet patient-salient after closure, since the cause→result closure edge introduces .result.

      Bridge to Bohnemeyer's 5-way verb stem classes #

      [Boh04] refines [Luc94]'s 4-way salience cut into a 5-way stem classification (active, inactive, inchoative, positional, transitiveActive). The mapping is VerbStemClass.toSalienceClass in VerbClasses.lean. The agent / patient / agent-patient classes correspond one-to-one; Lucy's positional covers both Bohnemeyer's inchoative and positional.

      The per-root theorems below check that for each Yukatek root in
      `Roots.lean`, Lucy's predicted class agrees with the Bohnemeyer
      stem-class label converted via `toSalienceClass`. 
      

      Agent-salient Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's active stem class.

      Agent-patient salient Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's transitiveActive.

      Positional Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's positional (and would equally map to inchoative per inchoative_positional_collapse_under_lucy).