Lucy 1994: The role of semantic value in lexical comparison #
[Luc94] argues that the right way to identify lexical classes is morpho-distributional, not denotational. Yucatek's "spatial" verbs are his test case: a notional set assembled by English intuition fails to coincide with any morphologically defined Yucatek class. What the morphology does deliver is a different, three-way classification of roots by salience profile, derivable from which transitiviser the root requires:
| Required transitiviser | Salience class | Examples |
|---|---|---|
=t (affective) | agent-salient | síit' "jump", ¢'iib "write" |
=∅ (zero) | agent-patient salient | kuč "carry", p'is "measure", lo'š "punch" |
=s (causative) | patient-salient | kíim "die", háan "cease", lúub' "fall", 'ok "enter" |
Crucially, Lucy's "motion" roots (luub, ok, etc.) do not form a
unified class — they pattern with other state-change verbs as
patient-salient. What does form a unified class is the positional
roots (čin "bend", kul "sit", etc.), distinguished by their derivation
via -tal (allomorph -lah) for the positional inchoative.
Here we recast the salience cut as a derived equivalence on roots
under the operator inventory in Fragments/Mayan/Yukatek/Operators.lean:
two roots have the same salience class iff the same operator(s) apply
to them. The classification then falls out of (B&K-G feature
signature × Coon root arity) × (operator applicability conditions) —
it is not stipulated. Arity carries the agent-patient class (Lucy's
=∅ roots "require two arguments"; p'is 'measure' and lo'š
'punch' entail no change of state, so no feature configuration could
carry it); the signature separates the two intransitive classes.
The structural theorem class_depends_only_on_signature_and_arity
makes this precise: salience class depends only on the pair, not on
the specific root identity. The per-root checks then degenerate to
finite lookups.
Salience classes (re-exported from theory) #
SalienceClass and classOf live in
Semantics/Lexical/Roots/SalienceClass.lean. This file
provides the full [Luc94] analysis on top of them:
operator-applicability characterizations and per-root sanity checks.
A root's predicted salience class: the substrate classifier applied to its signature and the fragment's arity assignment.
Equations
Instances For
Predicted class agrees with operator applicability #
Both predictedClass and the inventory's applicability profile
factor through the pair (kind signature × arity), drawn from a
32-element fintype. Each characterisation therefore reduces —
after rewriting the profile to pair level
(applicableNames_eq_profile) and generalising the pair — to a
statement over all pairs that decide checks. The local macro
lucy_applicable packages the reduction.
The =t-only applicability profile characterises agent-salient roots.
The =∅-only applicability profile characterises agent-patient salient roots.
The =s-only applicability profile characterises patient-salient roots.
The -tal-only applicability profile characterises positional roots.
An empty applicability profile characterises roots in [Luc94]'s
diagnostic gap (the no-manner, no-result signatures other than the
pure positional configuration {.state}).
Applicability-as-classifier. Two roots have the same applicability profile under [Luc94]'s diagnostic inventory iff they have the same predicted salience class. The 4 named-class iff-theorems are special cases.
Per-root sanity checks #
Agent-salient.
Agent-patient salient.
Patient-salient.
Motion roots — pattern as patient-salient (Lucy's central point).
Positional.
The "motion verbs" non-class #
[Luc94]'s central typological point: "motion" verbs
(luub "fall", ok "enter") are not in their own salience class
— they pattern with other patient-salient state-change roots.
Concretely: their predicted class is the same as kiim "die".
Conversely, positional roots do form a unified class distinguishable from any "motion" or state-change root: their predicted class differs from every patient-salient root's.
Root transitivity is not MRC violation #
Lucy's root transitives are manner-only roots in B&K-G terms —
lexical transitivity does not entail a result. Under the previous
schema (agent-patient salience as manner + result) every Yukatek
root transitive came out violating Manner/Result Complementarity,
contradicting [BKG20]'s finding that
manner+result roots are a restricted, special class; hit-type
surface-contact roots like lo'š 'punch' are their parade
manner-without-result examples.
Closure robustness #
The class predicted from a root's closed kind signature
(the collocational closure Root.Kinds.close of the derived
signature). Arity is closure-invariant.
Equations
Instances For
For cause-free roots, collocational closure does not change the
Lucy 1994 salience classification: arity is untouched, the only
closure edge that can fire is result→state, the agent / patient
arms ignore .state membership, and a base that gains .state
from closure carries .result and so is already excluded from the
positional arm. The hypothesis is necessary: an intransitive root
carrying .cause but not .result is unclassified at base yet
patient-salient after closure, since the cause→result closure edge
introduces .result.
Bridge to Bohnemeyer's 5-way verb stem classes #
[Boh04] refines [Luc94]'s 4-way salience
cut into a 5-way stem classification (active, inactive,
inchoative, positional, transitiveActive). The mapping is
VerbStemClass.toSalienceClass in VerbClasses.lean. The agent /
patient / agent-patient classes correspond one-to-one; Lucy's
positional covers both Bohnemeyer's inchoative and positional.
The per-root theorems below check that for each Yukatek root in
`Roots.lean`, Lucy's predicted class agrees with the Bohnemeyer
stem-class label converted via `toSalienceClass`.
Agent-salient Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's active stem class.
Agent-patient salient Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's
transitiveActive.
Patient-salient Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's inactive.
Positional Lucy roots map to Bohnemeyer's positional (and would
equally map to inchoative per inchoative_positional_collapse_under_lucy).