Bifurcation and Manner/Result Complementarity for Roots #
The two conjectures [BKG20] argue against,
stated for roots by delegation to the signature level
(Roots/Signature.lean):
- Bifurcation Thesis of Roots ([Emb09]; the assumption of
[Ara05]): meaning introduced by a functional head — change,
cause — can never be part of a root's meaning. As an order
statement: every root's signature lies below
Root.Kinds.ontological. - Manner/Result Complementarity ([RHL10]): a
single root entails a manner or a result, never both. As an order
statement: no root's signature lies above
{manner, result}.
Falsifying witnesses live in Studies/BeaversKoontzGarboden2020.lean.
Main declarations #
A root violates Bifurcation iff it itself carries templatic
(eventive) meaning — change of state or cause
(Root.Kinds.violatesBifurcation_iff). The Bifurcation
Thesis ([Emb09]; [Ara05]) is the universal claim that no
root does. (The ditransitive prepositional heads P_loc and P_have,
which [BKG20] also treat as templatic, are
not modeled here.)
Equations
Instances For
Negation of ViolatesBifurcation: the root carries only
ontological entailments (state, manner).
Equations
Instances For
The thesis as an order statement: a root respects Bifurcation iff its signature is bounded by the ontological kinds.
A root has both manner and result entailments — Manner/Result Complementarity ([RHL10]) is the universal claim that no root does.