Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Mayan.Yukatek.VerbClasses

Yukatek Maya Verb Classes and Status System #

Yukatek Maya has a typologically rare split-intransitive pattern of argument marking controlled by overt aspect-mood marking ([Boh04]; [Luc94]). The system comprises five verb stem classes distinguished by status inflection patterns (allomorphy of aspect-mood suffixes) and four status categories encoding viewpoint aspect and modal assertiveness. The split in argument marking tracks the aspectual value: perfective status marks S like U (ergative), imperfective status marks S like A (accusative).

Main declarations #

Implementation notes #

Verb stem classes ([Boh04] Table 3; [Luc94]):

ClassEvent typeExamples
activeprocesswalk, sing, dance, sneeze
inactivestate changedie, burst, enter, exit
inchoativestate change (stative root + -tal)blacken, shrink, sink
positionalstate change (spatial config.)sit, stand, hang, be round
transitive activetransitivehit, chip, eat

Status marking encodes both viewpoint aspect and modal assertiveness ([Boh04] Table 2):

Verb stem classes #

The five verb stem classes of Yukatek Maya, distinguished by status inflection patterns ([Boh04] Table 3; [Luc94]).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Whether a verb stem class is intransitive.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Status categories #

        The four status categories of Yukatek Maya, encoding viewpoint aspect and modal assertiveness ([Boh04] Table 2).

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Whether the status category is assertive (modal component).

            Equations
            Instances For

              Argument marking pattern #

              Which marker set cross-references the sole argument (S) of an intransitive verb, given the status category ([Boh04] Table 2). Perfective status gives set-B (ergative, S = U), imperfective set-A (accusative, S = A); the imperative is omitted from Table 2's split analysis.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The split: perfective → set-B (ergative), imperfective → set-A (accusative).

                Representative verb entries #

                A Yukatek verb entry for the split-intransitivity analysis: stem class and causation type of the intransitive base.

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    def Yukatek.instReprYukatekVerb.repr :
                    YukatekVerbStd.Format
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Event-structure templates #

                      The stem class → template mapping preserves event type: VerbStemClass.eventType agrees with Template.eventTypetoTemplate.

                      Salience classes ([Luc94]) #

                      Bohnemeyer's 5-way stem classes refining Lucy's positional class: inchoative and positional both reduce to the same Lucy class.

                      toSalienceClass is surjective: every Lucy class is in the image of Bohnemeyer's 5-way refinement.

                      The fibre of toSalienceClass over .positional is exactly {.inchoative, .positional} — these are the two Bohnemeyer classes that collapse under [Luc94]'s 4-way cut. The other three fibres are singletons (active ↦ agent, inactive ↦ patient, transitiveActive ↦ agentPatient).

                      Split-ergative system #

                      Yukatek split-ergative system, parameterized by status category: perfective status (completive/subjunctive) triggers ergative alignment, imperfective (incompletive) accusative; the imperative defaults to ergative. Instantiates the same Alignment.SplitErgativity used by Hindi and Georgian.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Yukatek and Hindi share the same split conditioning: perfective → ergative, imperfective → accusative. This is [Boh04]'s core insight that a single linking-by-viewpoint mechanism underlies both systems.