Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Mayan.Yukatek.VerbClasses

Yukatek Maya Verb Classes and Status System #

[Boh04] [Luc94]

Yukatek Maya has a typologically rare split-intransitive pattern of argument marking controlled by overt aspect-mood marking. The system comprises five verb stem classes distinguished by their status inflection patterns (allomorphy of aspect-mood suffixes).

Verb Stem Classes #

ClassEvent typeExamples
activeprocesswalk, sing, dance, sneeze
inactivestate changedie, burst, enter, exit
inchoativestate change (stative root + -tal)blacken, shrink, sink
positionalstate change (spatial config.)sit, stand, hang, be round
transitive activetransitivehit, chip, eat

Status Categories #

Status marking encodes both viewpoint aspect and modal assertiveness ([Boh04] Table 2):

The split in argument marking is associated with the aspectual value: perfective status → S marked like U (ergative); imperfective status → S marked like A (accusative).

The five verb stem classes of Yukatek Maya, distinguished by status inflection patterns ([Boh04] Table 3; [Luc94]).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Event type encoded by each verb stem class. Active stems encode processes; all others encode state changes.

      [Boh04] §5: degree achievement verbs regularly appear in the inactive and inchoative classes despite being atelic. Their event structure encodes state change — the process/state-change distinction, not telicity, motivates class membership.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Whether a verb stem class is intransitive.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The four status categories of Yukatek Maya, encoding viewpoint aspect and modal assertiveness ([Boh04] Table 2).

          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Whether the status category is assertive (modal component).

              Equations
              Instances For

                Which marker set cross-references the sole argument (S) of an intransitive verb, given the status category.

                [Boh04] Table 2:

                • Perfective status (completive/subjunctive): S = U → set-B (ergative)
                • Imperfective status (incompletive): S = A → set-A (accusative)
                • Imperative: not discussed in the split analysis (Table 2 omits it)
                Equations
                Instances For

                  The split: perfective → set-B (ergative), imperfective → set-A (accusative).

                  A Yukatek verb entry for the split intransitivity analysis. Records stem class and causation type of the intransitive base.

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      def Yukatek.instReprYukatekVerb.repr :
                      YukatekVerbStd.Format
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Map Yukatek verb stem classes to R&H event structure templates. This connects the language-specific classification to the theory-level decomposition in EventStructure.lean.

                        • Active → activity [x ACT]
                        • Inactive/inchoative → achievement [BECOME [x ⟨STATE⟩]]
                        • Positional → achievement (externally-caused spatial config.)
                        • Transitive active → accomplishment [[x ACT] CAUSE [BECOME [y ⟨STATE⟩]]]
                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The stem class → template mapping preserves event type: VerbStemClass.eventType agrees with Template.eventTypetoTemplate.

                          Bohnemeyer's 5-way stem classes refining Lucy's positional class: inchoative and positional both reduce to the same Lucy class.

                          toSalienceClass is surjective: every Lucy class is in the image of Bohnemeyer's 5-way refinement.

                          The fibre of toSalienceClass over .positional is exactly {.inchoative, .positional} — these are the two Bohnemeyer classes that collapse under [Luc94]'s 4-way cut. The other three fibres are singletons (active ↦ agent, inactive ↦ patient, transitiveActive ↦ agentPatient).

                          Yukatek split-ergative system, parameterized by status category. Perfective status (completive/subjunctive) triggers ergative alignment; imperfective status (incompletive) triggers accusative alignment. Imperative is treated as ergative (completive-like default).

                          This instantiates the same Alignment.SplitErgativity type used by Hindi and Georgian, enabling cross-linguistic comparison.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Yukatek and Hindi share the same split conditioning: perfective → ergative, imperfective → accusative. This is [Boh04]'s core insight that a single linking-by-viewpoint mechanism underlies both systems.