Documentation

Studies.HartmannZimmermann2007

Hartmann and Zimmermann (2007): In place — out of place? Focus strategies in Hausa #

Hartmann and Zimmermann's argument that Hausa is a counterexample to two universalist claims: that focus is always marked, and that the position of a focus determines its pragmatic interpretation. Focus is realized in situ or ex situ, and the paper's §3.2 matrix crosses the two strategies with four pragmatic uses, new-information, corrective, contrastive and selective, every cell of which is licensed (hzMatrix); strategy_does_not_determine_pragType refutes the Meaning-Structure Mapping Hypothesis of (21), the label following Vallduví and Vilkuna, stated as a failure of Function.FactorsThrough on the licensed utterances, so that the Hungarian and Hausa verdicts differ on one predicate. In-situ new-information focus carries no morphosyntactic reflex, and the §5 pilot finds no prosodic one either, so hausa_falsifies_UniversalBFR refutes the Basic Focus Rule of Selkirk; focused subjects, by contrast, always front (§2.2.2). Exhaustivity is not structural: the particle kawài 'only' exhaustifies over the resolved contrast set in either position.

Implementation notes #

The §1.2 control taxonomy of uses and its factor-through theorems live in Semantics/Focus/Control.lean, and each cell's pragmatic type is computed from its controlling context rather than tagged. Subject foci in TAMs lacking a Relative form (future, habitual, subjunctive) are syntactically and morphologically unmarked, which the paper analyses as string-vacuous fronting, so the licensing predicate bans in-situ subjects unconditionally and the future subject focus of (8) is licensed yet reflex-free. The paper counts the subjunctive with the future and the habitual, but Newman excludes it from Rel environments, and the fragment's licensing, which is his, rejects a fronted subjunctive (not_licensed_exSitu_subjunctive). Which TAMs show Relative morphology is not stipulated: a licensed fronted focus changes the TAM exactly when the TAM does not occur in Rel environments (Hausa.FocusConfig.pacTAM_ne_iff), the completive and continuous of the paper's data. The §3.3 corpus tendencies stay in prose: answers to wh-questions are mostly in situ (99 against 25) and selective, corrective and contrastive foci mostly ex situ (154 against 12), but no use is categorically excluded from either position, and only that categorical claim is a theorem. Locators follow the authors' prepublication manuscript of the chapter.

TODO #

References #

What is focused (§2.2.2) #

Hausa singles out subjects as what is focused (§2.2.2); everything else collapses to nonSubject.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Tagged focus utterances and Hausa licensing #

      A FocusConfig tagged with its pragmatic use and focused constituent.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          An utterance is Hausa-licensed when it is morphosyntactically licensed (FocusConfig.Licensed) and respects the §2.2.2 ban on in-situ subject focus. The ban is unconditional, since in TAMs without a Relative form the fronting is merely invisible (p. 4), not absent.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[instance_reducible]
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

            Controlling contexts of the §3.2 matrix #

            Every cell's mini-scenario has one shape: a two-point answer domain — the mentioned answer ans vs the contextual alternative alt — whose content (fish vs other dishes, fifteen vs twenty Naira, behind vs in front, …) lives in the cell's data row. The antecedent is the canonical Use.model of the row's context shape; the answer is composed by the engine (pairAnswer); ctx_resolves is the uniform full-resolution fact. Ex-situ variants are interpreted at the base structure (fronting is A'-movement for the paper, and alternatives do not distribute through abstraction: PredAbs WithAlternatives = ⟨none⟩).

            The two-point answer domain of a cell's mini-scenario.

            Instances For

              The canonical antecedent of a use over the two-point scenario.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Every cell's context fully resolves against the composed answer — all squiggle clauses, plus the correction clause for the corrective cells. One semantics, four pragmatic uses.

                Exhaustive focus (§3.2, (32)) #

                Exhaustivity is not structurally encoded: it is induced by focus particles (kawài 'only'; nee/cee per the paper's fn. 3) over the resolved contrast set, in either strategy — (32a/b) attest in-situ and ex-situ only BOOKS alike.

                The exhaustified answer is the exclusion asserted by only over the scenario's resolved contrast set.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  The exhaustified answer computes to the bare true answer, uniformly across the four uses. Exhaustification consumes the resolved contrast set and prejacent, never the strategy, which is the §3.2 point that exhaustive readings are available in both positions.

                  The 8-cell empirical matrix (§3.2) #

                  Each cell's pragmatic type is computed from its controlling context: the constructors take a Focus.Antecedent, not a tag.

                  def HartmannZimmermann2007.mkExSituUtt (tam pacTAM : Hausa.TAM) (cell : Agreement.Bundle) (g : Gender) (hasStab : Bool) {W : Type u_1} (ctl : Focus.Antecedent W) (foc : Focused := Focused.nonSubject) :
                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    def HartmannZimmermann2007.mkInSituUtt (tam : Hausa.TAM) (cell : Agreement.Bundle) (g : Gender) {W : Type u_1} (ctl : Focus.Antecedent W) (foc : Focused := Focused.nonSubject) (hasStab : Bool := false) :
                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Ex-situ new-information focus ((22), Examples.ex22).

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Ex-situ corrective focus on a feminine subject ((24), Examples.ex24).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Ex-situ selective focus, no stabilizer ((29), Examples.ex29).

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Ex-situ contrastive focus, no stabilizer, with the impersonal akèe ((27), Examples.ex27).

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              In-situ corrective focus with sentence-final nèe ((25), Examples.ex25).

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                The 8-cell matrix of §3.2 crosses both strategies with all four pragmatic types.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Every cell of the §3.2 matrix is Hausa-licensed.

                                  Strategy does not determine pragmatic type (§3.2) #

                                  theorem HartmannZimmermann2007.strategy_does_not_determine_pragType :
                                  ¬Function.FactorsThrough (fun (u : { u : FocusUtterance // u.IsHausaLicensed }) => (↑u).pragType) fun (u : { u : FocusUtterance // u.IsHausaLicensed }) => (↑u).cfg.strategy

                                  On Hausa-licensed utterances pragType does not factor through strategy, since (22) and (24) are both ex-situ with distinct pragmatic types.

                                  The refutation persists when restricted to in-situ utterances, by (23) against (25).

                                  Subject-focus generalization (§2.2.2) #

                                  Focused subjects front (§2.2.2); unpacks the second conjunct of IsHausaLicensed.

                                  The starred in-situ subject focus ((17 A2), Examples.ex17a2).

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    The grammatical ex-situ subject focus ((17 A1), Examples.ex17a1).

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Subject focus in the future, which occurs in Rel environments unchanged ((8), Examples.ex8), is string-vacuous fronting with no overt reflex (exSitu_subject_future_no_reflex).

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        No fronted subjunctive is licensed, since the subjunctive has no Rel counterpart.

                                        Universalist Basic Focus Rule (§5, §6.2) #

                                        The overt reflexes of a focus utterance in the shared Reflex vocabulary are non-vacuous fronting (subjects front string-vacuously), the Rel form of the PAC where fronting changes the TAM, and the stabilizer.

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          A focus utterance has a morphosyntactic reflex when some reflex lies outside the phonological channel.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For
                                            @[instance_reducible]
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                            The universalist claim — [Sel95]'s Basic Focus Rule and its tradition (§5, §6.2) — that every focused utterance carries some structural reflex, weakened to morphosyntax and quantified over Hausa utterances only.

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              (23) is licensed and reflex-free; the §5 pilot finds no prosodic reflex either.

                                              Every Hausa focus reflex is morphosyntactic, so a morphosyntactic reflex is just an overt one.

                                              Hausa refutes the universalist claim that every (licensed) focus receives an overt reflex — the same shape Tangale refutes in HartmannZimmermann2004.lean.

                                              Polar tone of nē/cē (§2.1) #

                                              The rows' tone labels.

                                              Equations
                                              Instances For
                                                theorem HartmannZimmermann2007.stab_tone_polar (e : Datum) :
                                                e ∈ [Examples.ex3a, Examples.ex3b] → e.parse? "stab_tone" toneTable = Option.map Hausa.polarOf (e.parse? "host_tone" toneTable)

                                                In (3a) and (3b) the stabilizer's tone is polar to the host's final tone, high after Kandè and low after Kiifii.

                                                Data linkage #

                                                Each cell's tags are pinned to the paperFeatures of its Data.Examples.HartmannZimmermann2007 row.

                                                Equations
                                                Instances For
                                                  Equations
                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                  Instances For
                                                    theorem HartmannZimmermann2007.cells_match_rows (p : FocusUtterance × Datum) :
                                                    p ∈ cellRows → p.2.feature? "strategy" = some (strategyLabel p.1.cfg.strategy) ∧ p.2.feature? "pragType" = some (pragLabel p.1.pragType) ∧ p.2.feature? "focused" = some (focusedLabel p.1.focused) ∧ p.2.feature? "stabilizer" = some (stabLabel p.1.cfg)

                                                    Every cell's tags agree with its row's paperFeatures.

                                                    (8) carries no pragmatic tag; its other tags agree with its cell.

                                                    The rows that tag a TAM tag the clause's TAM, not its PAC's, as (17 A1) is continuous with a Rel-continuous PAC.