[Miz24] — Strategies for Anderson Conditionals #
Teruyuki Mizuno (2024), "Strategies for Anderson Conditionals: Their Implications for the Typology of O-Marking and X-Marking", Semantics and Pragmatics 17(8): 1–14. [And51] [Sch04b] [vFI23] [Iat00]
Anderson conditionals ([And51]) argue for the truth of their antecedent.
English must X-mark them (O-marking is trivial); Japanese and Mandarin must O-mark
them — their X-marking (Fake Past -ta: [Ogi14], [MK19];
perfective le) forces a counterfactual reading. Both strategies expand the modal
domain D ⊂ D⁺; Mizuno adopts the expansion analysis (fn 6, [Mac15],
[Mac19] contra [Iat00] / [Sch14] exclusion) and analyzes Japanese
O-marking as a Historical-Present shift ([Sch04b], [AT18a],
[AT18b]) expanding D backward under branching time.
Stimuli: Data/Examples/Mizuno2024.json (module Mizuno2024.Examples); #guards
check observed directions on the named examples, row theorems quantify over
Examples.all. Semantics: Semantics.Conditionals.strictImp over a
HistoricalAlternatives base; Semantics.Modality.Exclusion supplies the X/O
typology and exponent inventory.
Main results #
english_japanese_discrepancy— English X-marks, Japanese O-marks.inventory_prediction_fails_japanese— the §3.1 puzzle: Japanese has X-marking (ex. 3) yet must not deploy it; English validates the inventory prediction.anderson_judgments_match_strategy— every recorded judgment matches the strategy record.flv_anderson_correlation— Anderson X-marking ⇔ FLV X-marking, per row (§4.2).oMarking_anderson_trivial/xMarking_expands/consequent_open_over_xMarkedBase/expanded_anderson_informative— the triviality puzzle and its resolution.hp_expands_jones_domain/consequent_open_after_hp— the HP route to the same conclusions: §4.1 on [vFI23]'s uniformity hypothesis.
The per-language strategy record (§2–§4.2) #
The felicitous Anderson marking per language: English X (§2, ex. 1a), Japanese O
(§3, ex. 4a -ru), Mandarin O (§4.2, ex. 13a without le); none outside the sample.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy "stan1293" = some Semantics.Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy "nucl1643" = some Semantics.Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.oMarking
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy "mand1415" = some Semantics.Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.oMarking
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy x✝ = none
Instances For
FLV X-marking availability (§4.2): English yes (ex. 8); Japanese -ta (ex. 10) and Mandarin le (ex. 12) induce strong counterfactuality instead.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable "stan1293" = some true
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable "nucl1643" = some false
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable "mand1415" = some false
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable x✝ = none
Instances For
English and Japanese pick opposite Anderson strategies (§3).
The §3.1 puzzle: available X-marking that must not be deployed #
Japanese has X-marking (Fake Past -ta, ex. 3; Japanese.Conditionals.xMarking), and §2
predicts it in Anderson conditionals — "strikingly, this is not borne out". Uniformity
(§4.1) survives as a meaning/use split: uniform semantics, blocked deployment.
X-marking exponents, routed from the Fragment inventory. Mandarin le is study-local: fn 15's single consultant is below the Fragment consensus bar.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf "stan1293" = English.Conditionals.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf "nucl1643" = Japanese.Conditionals.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf "mand1415" = some { form := "le", components := [Semantics.Modality.Exclusion.XMarkingHost.perfective] }
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf x✝ = none
Instances For
The inventory-driven prediction: X-mark wherever the inventory provides X-marking (§2; a fortiori under fn 14's [Chi98]-style blocking).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
English validates the inventory prediction.
The §3.1 puzzle: Japanese has the X resource yet must not deploy it.
Mandarin patterns with Japanese (§4.2).
The attested minimal pairs #
Pairs live inside one numbered example: the felicitous primaryText (strategy m)
plus the infelicitous alternatives entry (realizing m.other).
Felicitous iff fully acceptable.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.isFelicitous Features.Judgment.acceptable = true
- Mizuno2024.isFelicitous x✝ = false
Instances For
Parse the strategy tag.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.ofStrategyTag? "x-marking" = some Semantics.Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.ofStrategyTag? "o-marking" = some Semantics.Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.oMarking
- Mizuno2024.ofStrategyTag? x✝ = none
Instances For
One Anderson row against the record: primary judgment matches strategy m, each
alternative matches m.other (§2: O-marking = absence of X-marking). Non-Anderson
rows pass vacuously.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every recorded Anderson judgment matches the strategy record.
The Future-Less-Vivid correlation (§4.2) #
The flv_xmarking tag.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.flvAvailableTag e = match e.feature? "flv_xmarking" with | some "available" => some true | some "unavailable" => some false | x => none
Instances For
§4.2: Anderson X-marking and FLV X-marking stand or fall together, for every
sampled language. An empirical correlation of two independent records, not a
definition; cf. Iatridou2000.CounterfactualType.flv (one ExclF layer).
The triviality puzzle and its resolution by domain expansion #
§2: an Anderson consequent is an observed fact, true throughout the live domain D,
so over D the conditional is trivial; both strategies expand D to a D⁺ containing
a consequent-failing world. The Jones scenario as strictImp over a historical base:
worlds are Bool (true = symptoms shown), the domain at an index is its live
alternatives. D = the domain at utteranceIdx; D⁺ via X-marking (larger base, same
index: xMarkedBase) or via HP (same base, earlier index: hpIdx) — same operator,
same two conclusions on each route: §4.1's uniformity of meaning under varying use.
The Anderson consequent: Jones shows the symptoms.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.showsSymptoms = {w : Bool | w = true}
Instances For
A backward-closed history: live iff the index's own world, or its time is ≤ 0.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.historyJones s = {w : Bool | w = s.world ∨ s.time ≤ 0}
Instances For
The utterance index; its domain is the paper's D.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.utteranceIdx = { world := true, time := 1 }
Instances For
The HP-shifted index (§3.3); its domain is D⁺ on the O-marking route.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.hpIdx = { world := true, time := 0 }
Instances For
The X-marked base: every world live at every index (§2, fn 6) — D⁺ on the
X-marking route.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.xMarkedBase x✝ = Set.univ
Instances For
Over D the consequent is trivial: only the symptom world is live (§2).
The symptom-absent world is not live at the utterance index.
O-marking without expansion: trivially true for any antecedent — the infelicity of ex. (2).
X-marking's expansion is strict — the paper's D ⊂ D⁺ (§2).
Over the X-marked D⁺ the consequent is left open (§2).
Japanese O-marking: HP expansion under branching time #
§3.3: the HP shift moves the evaluation index backward; live possibilities shrink
monotonically over time (the substrate's backwardsClosed, anchored on
[Con02]), so the earlier index has a larger domain.
The HP shift strictly enlarges the live domain (§3.3): subset by histEquiv_mono,
strictness by the newly live symptom-absent world.
Over the HP-shifted domain the consequent is left open — the conclusion
consequent_open_over_xMarkedBase reaches by enlarging the base (§3.3, §4.1).
The payoff (§2: "one can make a meaningful, contingent claim"): a true Anderson
conditional at the HP index excludes a live world (Set.not_subset for the
witness form).