Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Iatridou2000

Iatridou (2000): The Grammatical Ingredients of Counterfactuality [Iat00] #

Theory-neutral cross-linguistic data and the ExclF analysis from [Iat00] "The Grammatical Ingredients of Counterfactuality", Linguistic Inquiry 31(2): 231–270.

Iatridou's central claim: the morphology we call "past tense" provides a skeletal exclusion feature (ExclF), T(x) excludes C(x) — the topic x excludes the speaker's x. Over times it yields temporal past; over worlds it yields counterfactuality. A counterfactual is built from ExclF, an aspectual component (imperfective in some languages), and mood.

Key empirical generalizations #

  1. Past morphology is uniform: FLV, PresCF, and PastCF all use past morphology, differing in the number of ExclF layers (1, 1, 2).
  2. Imperfective is not universal: languages with imperfective (Greek, French) use it in CFs; languages without it (English) omit it.
  3. Subjunctive mirrors past-subjunctive availability (§6.1): a CF uses subjunctive only in languages with a past-subjunctive paradigm — German and Italian do; French and Indo-Aryan have only a nonpast subjunctive and don't.

See also #

Iatridou's counterfactual typology #

[Iat00]'s three counterfactual conditional types, distinguished by the number of ExclFs and (in the one-ExclF cases) the predicate's Aktionsart.

  • flv : CounterfactualType

    Future Less Vivid: one ExclF (over worlds) + telic/activity predicate.

  • presCF : CounterfactualType

    Present Counterfactual: one ExclF (over worlds) + individual-level stative.

  • pastCF : CounterfactualType

    Past Counterfactual: two ExclFs — one over worlds, one over times.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      ExclF count per type. PresCF/FLV have one (over worlds); PastCF has two — the pluperfect's two past layers, one fake (modal) and one real (temporal) ([Iat00] §4, p. 252).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Predicate Aktionsart relevant to the FLV/PresCF split ([Iat00], Tables 1–2). The individual-level vs stage-level distinction among statives is not recoverable from Vendler class (both are "states"), so it is encoded directly rather than derived from a VendlerClass.

        • telic : IatridouPredType

          Telic: arrive, build a house (evaluated in the future → FLV).

        • activity : IatridouPredType

          Activity: run, push the cart — patterns with telics ([Iat00], fn 24).

        • ilp : IatridouPredType

          Individual-level stative: be tall, know French (holds also now → PresCF).

        • slp : IatridouPredType

          Stage-level stative: be sick, be drunk (future or now → FLV or PresCF).

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Classify a counterfactual from its ExclF configuration and predicate type, returning the set of licensed CF readings ( if there is no modal ExclF).

            Faithful to [Iat00] Table 1: with one (modal) ExclF, a telic or activity predicate yields FLV, an individual-level stative yields PresCF, and a stage-level stative yields both (FLV with a future adverbial, PresCF otherwise — ex (64)). Two ExclFs yield PastCF regardless of predicate.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Individual-level stative + one modal ExclF → PresCF only.

              Stage-level stative + one modal ExclF → both FLV and PresCF ([Iat00], Table 1, ex (64)): "If he were drunk at next week's meeting" (FLV) vs "If he were drunk, he would be louder" (PresCF).

              Two ExclFs → PastCF, regardless of predicate type.

              theorem Iatridou2000.no_modal_not_cf (temporalExcl : Bool) (pred : IatridouPredType) :
              classifyCounterfactual false temporalExcl pred =

              No modal ExclF → not a counterfactual.

              def Iatridou2000.iatridouSubjGeneralization (hasPastSubj requiresSubj : Bool) :

              [Iat00]'s subjunctive prediction (§6.1, p. 264): a CF uses subjunctive only in languages that have a past-subjunctive paradigm.

              The paper states it one-directionally (uses → has); we encode the biconditional, which all languages in the data satisfy: English, Greek, and French lack a productive past subjunctive and use none in CFs; Italian has one and requires it.

              Equations
              Instances For
                theorem Iatridou2000.pastCF_tower_depth {W : Type u_1} {E : Type u_2} {P : Type u_3} {T : Type u_4} (c : Semantics.Context.KContext W E P T) (w' : W) (t' t'' : T) :

                A PastCF tower has depth 2 — the two past morpheme layers (one fake/modal, one real/temporal).

                Datum structures #

                Whether a language requires subjunctive in CFs, and whether it has a distinct past subjunctive.

                • language : String
                • hasPastSubjunctive : Bool
                • cfRequiresSubjunctive : Bool
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Per-language imperfective ([Iat00], generalization 2) #

                    The CF-type layer counts (generalization 1) are language-neutral properties of CounterfactualType.exclFCount — see the data theorems below — so there is no per-(language × CF-type) morphology table. The one morphological ingredient that varies cross-linguistically is the imperfective: a per-language fact.

                    The languages [Iat00] draws CF morphology from.

                    Instances For
                      @[implicit_reducible]
                      Equations
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Whether a language uses imperfective morphology in counterfactuals: Greek and French do, English does not. Uniform across CF types within a language. Grounded in the impf tags of Data/Examples/Iatridou2000.json by imperfective_grounded below.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Subjunctive-requirement data ([Iat00], §6.1) #

                          English: no productive past subjunctive (vestigial were aside), none required.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Greek: na-clauses are not CF subjunctive ([Iat00], fn 37); none required.

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              French: no productive past subjunctive (only the dubitative); CFs use the past indicative ([Iat00], §6.1, ex (99)).

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Italian: has a past subjunctive (congiuntivo trapassato) and requires it in CFs — a positive case for [Iat00]'s §6.1 prediction.

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Data theorems #

                                  Generalization 1 ([Iat00]): every CF type carries past morphology — it has at least one ExclF (past) layer. A property of the CounterfactualType taxonomy, not a per-row stipulation.

                                  The pluperfect's extra layer ([Iat00] §3): PastCF carries strictly more ExclF layers than the one-layer FLV and PresCF.

                                  Generalization 2 ([Iat00]): the imperfective is not a universal ingredient of counterfactuality — some languages use it, others do not.

                                  Each language satisfies [Iat00]'s subjunctive generalization (§6.1).

                                  Grounding in the glossed stimuli #

                                  The generalizations are grounded in the verified glossed sentences of Data/Examples/Iatridou2000.json (generated Iatridou2000.Examples): all three CF types are attested, and the per-language imperfective fact matches the examples' impf tags.

                                  The impf tag read as a Bool.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For
                                    theorem Iatridou2000.cf_types_attested :
                                    Examples.en_flv.feature? "cf_type" = some "flv" Examples.en_presCF.feature? "cf_type" = some "presCF" Examples.en_pastCF.feature? "cf_type" = some "pastCF"

                                    All three CF types are attested in the English stimuli.

                                    usesImperfectiveInCF matches the example impf tags — English (no), Greek (yes), French (yes). Flipping a JSON tag or the generalization breaks this.

                                    ContextTower bridge #

                                    @[reducible, inline]
                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      The actual context: world = true (actual), time = 0 (now).

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        FLV/PresCF: one subjunctive shift to a counterfactual world (false ≠ true).

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          The tower has depth 1 — matching one past morpheme layer.

                                          Tower depth (1) matches the PresCF ExclF-layer count (1).

                                          PastCF: a modal shift (subjunctive, world) plus a temporal shift (an extra past layer, time → -5).

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            The tower has depth 2 — matching two past morpheme layers.

                                            Modal ExclF holds: the counterfactual world ≠ the actual world. The modal+temporal pair is the substrate's PastCF configuration (two_shifts_two_exclFs).

                                            Tower depth (2) matches the PastCF ExclF-layer count (2).

                                            Even in a PastCF tower (depth 2), the origin context is preserved.

                                            theorem Iatridou2000.cf_diagnostics_examples :
                                            Examples.ex2a.feature? "cf_type" = some "presCF" Examples.ex2b.feature? "cf_type" = some "pastCF" presCFTower.depth = 1 pastCFTower.depth = 2

                                            The present/past-CF ExclF diagnostics are witnessed by Iatridou's (2a)/(2b): (2a) is a PresCF (one modal ExclF, tower depth 1), (2b) a PastCF (two ExclFs, depth 2). Ties the glossed (2)-stimuli to the ContextTower model.