Documentation

Studies.Schwarz2009

Schwarz (2009): Two Types of Definites in Natural Language #

This file formalizes [Sch09b]'s thesis that the definite article decomposes into two articles with distinct presuppositions, the weak article of uniqueness and the strong article of familiarity, read off the German paradigm of contracted against full preposition-article forms and masked in English by the syncretic the. Both articles are evaluated at a resource situation; the strong article additionally takes an anaphoric index, so the weak article's referent is the unique satisfier at the situation and covaries with it (weak_article_referent_iff, weak_article_covaries), while the strong article's referent is the antecedent wherever it is defined and does not (strong_article_referent_iff, strong_article_rigid). The German inventory marks the two strengths with distinct forms and the English one with a single form (german_two_articles, english_syncretic_articles, strategy_split). The two articles can disagree on a referent in one context: over a restrictor with two satisfiers the weak article fails uniqueness and the strong article returns its antecedent (weak_article_fails_on_multi, strong_article_picks_indexed_antecedent, two_articles_can_disagree).

References #

The two articles take different arguments #

theorem Schwarz2009.weak_article_referent_iff {E W : Type} (R : Reference.Restrictor E W) (g : Assignment E) (s : W) (x : E) :
Semantics.Denotes.denote (Reference.Description.unique R) g s = some x ↔ R g s x ∧ ∀ (y : E), R g s y → y = x

The weak article denotes x at a situation iff x is the unique satisfier of the restrictor there: the situation fixes the referent.

theorem Schwarz2009.strong_article_referent_iff {E W : Type} (R : Reference.Restrictor E W) (d : ℕ) (g : Assignment E) (s : W) (x : E) :
Semantics.Denotes.denote (Reference.Description.anaphoric R d) g s = some x ↔ R g s (g d) ∧ x = g d

The strong article denotes x at a situation iff x is its antecedent g d and the restrictor holds of the antecedent there: the index fixes the referent.

theorem Schwarz2009.strong_article_rigid {E W : Type} (R : Reference.Restrictor E W) (d : ℕ) (g : Assignment E) {s s' : W} {x x' : E} (h : Semantics.Denotes.denote (Reference.Description.anaphoric R d) g s = some x) (h' : Semantics.Denotes.denote (Reference.Description.anaphoric R d) g s' = some x') :
x = x'

The strong article's referent does not covary with the resource situation.

The morphological correlate #

German is bipartite and English generally marked: the same two strengths, distinguished at the surface in one language and not the other.

The two articles pick different referents #

Two students.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    def Schwarz2009.instReprStudent.repr :
    Student → ℕ → Std.Format
    Equations
    Instances For

      Both students count as students at every situation, so the restrictor has two satisfiers and the weak article fails uniqueness.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The discourse referent at index 0 is Alice.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The weak article fails on a restrictor with two satisfiers.

          The strong article returns its antecedent however many entities satisfy the restrictor.

          The two articles disagree on a referent in the same context: the semantic counterpart of the German morphological split.

          A restrictor whose unique satisfier differs between two situations, the mayor across towns.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The weak article covaries with the resource situation: over mayorRestr it picks Alice in one situation and Bob in the other, the covarying larger-situation uses that the strong article lacks (strong_article_rigid).