Schwarz (2009): Two Types of Definites in Natural Language #
This file formalizes [Sch09b]'s thesis that the definite article decomposes into two
articles with distinct presuppositions, the weak article of uniqueness and the strong article of
familiarity, read off the German paradigm of contracted against full preposition-article forms
and masked in English by the syncretic the. Both articles are evaluated at a resource
situation; the strong article additionally takes an anaphoric index, so the weak article's
referent is the unique satisfier at the situation and covaries with it
(weak_article_referent_iff, weak_article_covaries), while the strong article's referent is
the antecedent wherever it is defined and does not (strong_article_referent_iff,
strong_article_rigid). The German inventory marks the two strengths with distinct forms and
the English one with a single form (german_two_articles, english_syncretic_articles,
strategy_split). The two articles can disagree on a referent in one context: over a restrictor
with two satisfiers the weak article fails uniqueness and the strong article returns its
antecedent (weak_article_fails_on_multi, strong_article_picks_indexed_antecedent,
two_articles_can_disagree).
References #
The two articles take different arguments #
The weak article denotes x at a situation iff x is the unique satisfier of the
restrictor there: the situation fixes the referent.
The strong article denotes x at a situation iff x is its antecedent g d and the
restrictor holds of the antecedent there: the index fixes the referent.
The strong article's referent does not covary with the resource situation.
The morphological correlate #
German marks both strengths, with distinct forms.
English marks both strengths with the one syncretic form the.
German is bipartite and English generally marked: the same two strengths, distinguished at the surface in one language and not the other.
The two articles pick different referents #
Equations
- Schwarz2009.instDecidableEqStudent x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Schwarz2009.instReprStudent = { reprPrec := Schwarz2009.instReprStudent.repr }
Equations
- Schwarz2009.instReprStudent.repr Schwarz2009.Student.alice prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Schwarz2009.Student.alice")).group prec✝
- Schwarz2009.instReprStudent.repr Schwarz2009.Student.bob prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Schwarz2009.Student.bob")).group prec✝
Instances For
Both students count as students at every situation, so the restrictor has two satisfiers and the weak article fails uniqueness.
Equations
- Schwarz2009.studentRestr x✝² x✝¹ x✝ = True
Instances For
The discourse referent at index 0 is Alice.
Equations
Instances For
The weak article fails on a restrictor with two satisfiers.
The strong article returns its antecedent however many entities satisfy the restrictor.
The two articles disagree on a referent in the same context: the semantic counterpart of the German morphological split.
A restrictor whose unique satisfier differs between two situations, the mayor across towns.
Equations
- Schwarz2009.mayorRestr x✝ s x = (x = if s = true then Schwarz2009.Student.alice else Schwarz2009.Student.bob)
Instances For
The weak article covaries with the resource situation: over mayorRestr it picks Alice in
one situation and Bob in the other, the covarying larger-situation uses that the strong article
lacks (strong_article_rigid).