Mizuno (2024): Strategies for Anderson Conditionals #
This file formalizes the account in [Miz24] of Anderson conditionals, conditionals
whose consequent is an observed fact and which therefore argue for their antecedent
([And51]). English must X-mark them, since over the live domain the consequent is
trivially true and O-marking says nothing, while Japanese and Mandarin must O-mark them:
their X-marking, the fake past -ta and the perfective le, forces a counterfactual
reading. The typological record and its attested minimal pairs are transferred from the
paper's examples (andersonStrategy, anderson_judgments_match_strategy), and the
correlation with future-less-vivid conditionals holds row by row
(flv_anderson_correlation). Both strategies enlarge the modal domain to one containing a
consequent-failing world, after the expansion analysis of [Mac15] and [Mac19]:
X-marking by enlarging the base (xMarking_expands), Japanese O-marking by a
historical-present shift of the evaluation index backward under branching time
([Sch04b]; hp_expands_jones_domain), and on either route the consequent is left
open and a true Anderson conditional excludes a live world (expanded_anderson_informative).
Implementation notes #
The Jones scenario is a strict conditional over a historical base whose worlds record
whether the symptoms are shown; the marking typology and exponent inventory are those of
Semantics/Modality/Exclusion, and the Mandarin exponent le is study-local, resting on
the paper's single consultant.
References #
The per-language strategy record (§2–§4.2) #
The felicitous Anderson marking of each language is X for English (§2, ex. 1a), O for
Japanese (§3, ex. 4a -ru) and O for Mandarin (§4.2, ex. 13a without le), and none outside
the sample.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy "stan1293" = some Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy "nucl1643" = some Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.oMarking
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy "mand1415" = some Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.oMarking
- Mizuno2024.andersonStrategy x✝ = none
Instances For
FLV X-marking availability (§4.2): English yes (ex. 8); Japanese -ta (ex. 10) and Mandarin le (ex. 12) induce strong counterfactuality instead.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable "stan1293" = some true
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable "nucl1643" = some false
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable "mand1415" = some false
- Mizuno2024.flvXMarkingAvailable x✝ = none
Instances For
English and Japanese pick opposite Anderson strategies (§3).
The §3.1 puzzle: available X-marking that must not be deployed #
Japanese has X-marking (Fake Past -ta, ex. 3; Japanese.Conditionals.xMarking), and §2
predicts it in Anderson conditionals — "strikingly, this is not borne out". Uniformity
(§4.1) survives as a meaning/use split: uniform semantics, blocked deployment.
X-marking exponents, routed from the Fragment inventory. Mandarin le is study-local: fn 15's single consultant is below the Fragment consensus bar.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf "stan1293" = English.Conditionals.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf "nucl1643" = Japanese.Conditionals.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf "mand1415" = some { form := "le", components := [Modality.Exclusion.XMarkingHost.perfective] }
- Mizuno2024.xExponentOf x✝ = none
Instances For
The inventory-driven prediction X-marks wherever the inventory provides X-marking (§2; a fortiori under the blocking of fn 14, after [Chi98]).
Equations
- Mizuno2024.inventoryPrediction lang = Option.map (fun (x : Modality.Exclusion.XMarkingExponent) => Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.xMarking) (Mizuno2024.xExponentOf lang)
Instances For
English validates the inventory prediction.
The §3.1 puzzle: Japanese has the X resource yet must not deploy it.
Mandarin patterns with Japanese (§4.2).
The attested minimal pairs #
Pairs live inside one numbered example: the felicitous primaryText (strategy m)
plus the infelicitous alternatives entry (realizing m.other).
Felicitous when fully acceptable.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.IsFelicitous j = (j = Judgment.acceptable)
Instances For
Parse the strategy tag.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.ofStrategyTag? "x-marking" = some Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.xMarking
- Mizuno2024.ofStrategyTag? "o-marking" = some Modality.Exclusion.MarkingStrategy.oMarking
- Mizuno2024.ofStrategyTag? x✝ = none
Instances For
An Anderson row matches the record when its primary judgment matches strategy m and each
alternative matches the other strategy, O-marking being the absence of X-marking.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Mizuno2024.instDecidablePredDatumAndersonRowOK = id (id inferInstance)
Every recorded Anderson judgment matches the strategy record.
The Future-Less-Vivid correlation (§4.2) #
The flv_xmarking tag.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.flvAvailableTag e = match e.feature? "flv_xmarking" with | some "available" => some true | some "unavailable" => some false | x => none
Instances For
§4.2: Anderson X-marking and FLV X-marking stand or fall together, for every
sampled language. An empirical correlation of two independent records, not a
definition; cf. Iatridou2000.CounterfactualType.flv (one ExclF layer).
The triviality puzzle and its resolution by domain expansion #
§2: an Anderson consequent is an observed fact, true throughout the live domain D,
so over D the conditional is trivial; both strategies expand D to a D⁺ containing
a consequent-failing world. The Jones scenario as strictImp over a historical base:
worlds are Bool (true = symptoms shown), the domain at an index is its live
alternatives. D = the domain at utteranceIdx; D⁺ via X-marking (larger base, same
index: xMarkedBase) or via HP (same base, earlier index: hpIdx) — same operator,
same two conclusions on each route: §4.1's uniformity of meaning under varying use.
The Anderson consequent, that Jones shows the symptoms.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.showsSymptoms = {w : Bool | w = true}
Instances For
A backward-closed history, on which a world is live at an index iff it is the index's own
world or the index's time is at most 0.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.historyJones s = {w : Bool | w = s.world ∨ s.time ≤ 0}
Instances For
The utterance index; its domain is the paper's D.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.utteranceIdx = (true, 1)
Instances For
The HP-shifted index (§3.3); its domain is D⁺ on the O-marking route.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.hpIdx = (true, 0)
Instances For
The X-marked base makes every world live at every index (§2, fn 6), the D⁺ of the
X-marking route.
Equations
- Mizuno2024.xMarkedBase x✝ = Set.univ
Instances For
Over D the consequent is trivial, since only the symptom world is live (§2).
The symptom-absent world is not live at the utterance index.
O-marking without expansion is trivially true for any antecedent, the infelicity of ex. (2).
X-marking's expansion is strict — the paper's D ⊂ D⁺ (§2).
Over the X-marked D⁺ the consequent is left open (§2).
Japanese O-marking: HP expansion under branching time #
§3.3: the HP shift moves the evaluation index backward; live possibilities shrink
monotonically over time (historyJones_antitone, the backward closure of [Con02]), so
the earlier index has a larger domain.
The HP shift strictly enlarges the live domain (§3.3): subset by antitonicity, strictness by the newly live symptom-absent world.
Over the HP-shifted domain the consequent is left open — the conclusion
consequent_open_over_xMarkedBase reaches by enlarging the base (§3.3, §4.1).
A true Anderson conditional at the HP index excludes a live world (Set.not_subset for the
witness form), so "one can make a meaningful, contingent claim" (§2).