Cohen (2013): No quantification without reinterpretation #
A generic or habitual sentence contains no audible quantifier, so the hearer must introduce one by reinterpreting the quantifierless input, and the introducing device — not a phonologically null determiner — fixes the quantifier's scope. Generics arise by Nunberg's Predicate Transfer: when predicating a property of a kind makes no pragmatic sense, the predicate is transferred to one true of a kind whose instances generically bear it. Pragmatic triggering leaves the transfer free to apply at any level of composition, after Nunberg and Recanati, so "Storks have a favorite nesting area" is scopally ambiguous — transfer of the verb leaves the generic under the existential, transfer of the whole phrase puts it above (§13.4.1) — though never out of an opaque context, since transfer needs the property's intension. Habituals arise by a type-shift: an eventive verb is evaluated at intervals while the present tense supplies a moment (after Taylor and Dowty), and the shift γ resolves the mismatch at the verb, before the object composes, so "Mary smokes a cigarette" keeps the generic under the existential and is odd, while the brand variant is fine (§13.4.2). That a type-shift applies only at its trigger site is argued from Partee and Rooth's SHIFT: negating a shifted verb differs from shifting a negated one, and only the first order is attested (§13.3.1, after the conjunction needed but didn't buy). Scope alone also does not exhaust the generic–negation interaction: focus fixes the alternative set of Cohen's earlier generic quantifier, so "Cows do not eat [nettles]" generalizes with exceptions while "Cows do [not] eat nettles" denies that any cow eats them (§13.2.1).
We state the two devices with the generic quantifier of Studies/Cohen1999.lean in the
transferred and shifted predicates, derive both scopes of the storks sentence from the
transfer's freedom of level and the infelicity of the cigarette sentence from the shift's
locality, and check the focus readings of the nettles sentence against the two
alternative sets.
Implementation notes #
The generic quantifier inside the reinterpretation operators is the absolute reading
with trivial alternatives, per the chapter's own pointer to Cohen's earlier work for its
content. Kinds are Unit, individuals and intervals Fin n; a felicity judgment is
derived as the absence of a true reading among the available ones.
TODO #
- Bare plurals under habituals ((18): gen above the existential only) follow from bare plurals introducing no discourse referent, a duplex condition under an existential being no well-formed DRS (after Cohen and Erteschik-Shir); this needs the DRT box substrate.
- Predicate Transfer's ban on scoping out of opaque contexts (§13.4.1) rests on its need for the property's intension, which these extensional models cannot state.
- The wide-scope generic objects of (19)–(20), which refute a syntactic account (§13.2.3), presuppose a subject–object asymmetry not encoded here.
References #
- A. Cohen, No Quantification without Reinterpretation (2013)
- G. Nunberg, Transfers of Meaning (1995)
- B. Partee and M. Rooth, Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity (1983)
- A. Cohen, Think Generic! The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences (1999)
- G. N. Carlson, Reference to Kinds in English (1977)
- M. Krifka, F. J. Pelletier, G. N. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Chierchia and G. Link, Genericity: An Introduction (1995)
- A. Cohen and N. Erteschik-Shir, Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals (2002)
- F. Recanati, Embedded Implicatures (2003)
- B. Taylor, Tense and Continuity (1977)
- D. R. Dowty, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar (1979)
The two reinterpretation devices (§13.3) #
Partee and Rooth's SHIFT, lifting an extensional transitive verb to take a quantifier object.
Equations
- Cohen2013.SHIFT V Q x = Q fun (y : E) => V x y
Instances For
Negating a shifted verb differs from shifting the negated verb, and only the first order is attested ((25)): a type-shift applies at its trigger site, before further composition.
Predicate Transfer for generics (§13.4.1): a property of individuals becomes the property of a kind whose instances generically bear it.
Equations
- Cohen2013.transfer instanceOf P k = Cohen1999.gen Finset.univ (fun (y : Ind) => instanceOf y k) (fun (x : Ind) => True) P
Instances For
Equations
- Cohen2013.instDecidableTransfer instanceOf P k = id inferInstance
The habitual type-shift γ (§13.4.2): a property of intervals becomes the property of a moment in whose surrounding interval it generically holds.
Equations
- Cohen2013.gamma containedIn P t = Cohen1999.gen Finset.univ (fun (e : Interval) => containedIn e t) (fun (x : Interval) => True) P
Instances For
Equations
- Cohen2013.instDecidableGamma containedIn P t = id inferInstance
A reinterpretation device applies at the mismatching word itself or at the containing phrase.
Instances For
Equations
- Cohen2013.instDecidableEqLevel x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The two devices that introduce covert quantifiers (§13.3).
Instances For
Equations
- Cohen2013.instDecidableEqDevice x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Where a device may apply (§13.3): Predicate Transfer is pragmatically triggered and free to apply at any level; a type-shift fires at the type-mismatch site only.
Equations
- Cohen2013.Device.predicateTransfer.AppliesAt x✝ = True
- Cohen2013.Device.typeShift.AppliesAt x✝ = (x✝ = Cohen2013.Level.word)
Instances For
Storks have a favorite nesting area (§13.4.1) #
Two storks, each nesting in its own area. Transfer at the verb quantifies each area's candidate nesters, transfer at the phrase quantifies the storks' own areas: the readings differ in truth value, and both are available to Predicate Transfer, so the sentence is scopally ambiguous and true on one reading.
Each of two storks nests in its own area.
Equations
- Cohen2013.nestsIn x1✝ x2✝ = (x1✝ = x2✝)
Instances For
Every individual stork instantiates the kind.
Equations
- Cohen2013.storkOf x✝¹ x✝ = True
Instances For
The two logical forms of the storks sentence, by level of transfer.
Equations
- Cohen2013.storksReading Cohen2013.Level.word = ∃ (a : Fin 2), Cohen2013.transfer Cohen2013.storkOf (fun (s : Fin 2) => Cohen2013.nestsIn s a) ()
- Cohen2013.storksReading Cohen2013.Level.phrase = Cohen2013.transfer Cohen2013.storkOf (fun (s : Fin 2) => ∃ (a : Fin 2), Cohen2013.nestsIn s a) ()
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The two levels yield distinct readings: no single area serves most storks, while every stork has its own.
Predicate Transfer makes a true reading available: the sentence is felicitous.
Mary smokes a cigarette (§13.4.2) #
Three occasions in the interval around the speech moment, a different cigarette each time. The type mismatch sits at the eventive verb, so γ may apply only there, leaving the existential above the generic; that sole available reading is false, which is the oddness of (17a)/(45). The brand variant (17b) is the same shift with a constant witness, so its narrow reading is true and the sentence is fine.
Mary smokes a different cigarette at each of three occasions.
Equations
- Cohen2013.smokes x1✝ x2✝ = (x1✝ = x2✝)
Instances For
Every occasion falls in the interval around the speech moment.
Equations
- Cohen2013.inSpeechInterval x✝¹ x✝ = True
Instances For
The two logical forms of the cigarette sentence, by level of the shift.
Equations
- Cohen2013.cigaretteReading Cohen2013.Level.word = ∃ (c : Fin 3), Cohen2013.gamma Cohen2013.inSpeechInterval (fun (e : Fin 3) => Cohen2013.smokes c e) ()
- Cohen2013.cigaretteReading Cohen2013.Level.phrase = Cohen2013.gamma Cohen2013.inSpeechInterval (fun (e : Fin 3) => ∃ (c : Fin 3), Cohen2013.smokes c e) ()
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The two levels yield distinct readings: no one cigarette is smoked at most occasions, while each occasion has its cigarette.
The shift's locality leaves no true reading available, which is the oddness of the restrictorless habitual.
One brand, smoked at every occasion.
Equations
- Cohen2013.smokesBrand x✝¹ x✝ = True
Instances For
With a constant witness the same local shift yields a true reading: the brand variant (17b) is fine.
Cows do not eat nettles (§13.2.1) #
Five cows, one a nettle-eater. With focus on the object, the alternatives are the ways of eating and the generic scopes over negation: cows in general eat something other than nettles, exceptions tolerated ((9a)). With focus on the auxiliary, the scope is its own sole alternative, the generic is the trivially true refutation reading, and the negated sentence denies that any cow eats nettles — false here ((9b)).
The one nettle-eating cow among five.
Equations
- Cohen2013.eatsNettles x✝ = (↑x✝ = 4)
Instances For
Every cow eats something, the disjunction of the alternatives under object focus.
Equations
- Cohen2013.eatsSomething x✝ = True
Instances For
With object focus the generic scopes over negation, and most eating cows avoid nettles ((9a)).
With auxiliary focus negation scopes over the generic, whose refutation reading is true as long as one cow eats nettles, so the sentence is false ((9b)).