Berent et al. (2016): The double identity of linguistic doubling #
This file formalizes the account of doubling by Berent, Bat-El, Brentari, Dupuis and Vaknin-Nusbaum. A doubled form XX has two parses. As a single morpheme it contains two identical constituents, which the Obligatory Contour Principle (OCP) bans. As a base followed by its copy it is morphological reduplication, which languages favour. In twelve experiments speakers disliked doubled novel words and novel ASL signs presented in isolation, and preferred them once doubling was linked to the meaning of a taught base. English speakers preferred doubled signs as plurals and not as diminutives, while Hebrew speakers, whose reduplication marks diminution and never plurality, showed the opposite pattern.
The authors' formal analysis has two constraints and no ranking. At the phonological level XX violates the OCP and the control XY does not. At the morphological level the copy escapes the OCP, which operates within a morpheme, and satisfies DEP, the ban on output material without an input correspondent, which XY violates by adding material to the base. Here both violation patterns are computed from the parses, over any type of prosodic constituent. The winner at each level harmonically bounds its competitors, so the predictions hold under both rankings.
Main definitions #
Parse: a name as a single morpheme or as a base followed by its copy.ocp,dep: the OCP within each morpheme, and DEP against the taught base.Level,tableau: the level of analysis, and the competition it induces between a doubled name and its control.SpokenLanguage,SpokenLanguage.Licenses: the meanings a language marks morphologically and by reduplication, and the two transfer conditions on a morphological parse of doubling.
Main results #
Parse.surface_reduplicated: the two parses of doubling share a surface form.optimal_phonology,optimal_morphology: the control wins at the phonological level and the reduplicative parse at the morphological level, under every ranking.SpokenLanguage.licenses_iff: a language licenses a meaning when it reduplicates for it, or reduplicates for nothing and marks it otherwise.exists_optimal_surface_iff: doubling is preferred exactly for the licensed meanings.english_licenses_iff,hebrew_licenses_iff,licenses_not_monotone: English licenses the plural alone and Hebrew the diminutive alone, although Hebrew morphology extends English morphology on both dimensions.
Implementation notes #
The control XY is a single morpheme at both levels, and DEP counts the constituents of a name's stem beyond the taught base. With no base taught a name is its own input, so DEP is vacuous. The reduplicative parse competes only at the morphological level, where the input contains the reduplicative morpheme. Negative evidence against reduplication for a meaning is read as the language reduplicating for other meanings only. The illicit conditions, where the base and the doubled form name objects of different kinds, are not modelled.
References #
The two parses of doubling #
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.instDecidableEqParse.decEq (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex a) (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex b) = if h : a = b then h ▸ isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
- BerentEtAl2016.instDecidableEqParse.decEq (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex form) (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated base) = isFalse ⋯
- BerentEtAl2016.instDecidableEqParse.decEq (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated base) (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex form) = isFalse ⋯
- BerentEtAl2016.instDecidableEqParse.decEq (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated a) (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated b) = if h : a = b then h ▸ isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Instances For
The morphemes of a parse, in order.
Equations
- (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex form).morphemes = [form]
- (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated base).morphemes = [base, base]
Instances For
A base followed by its copy has the surface form of the simplex double, so doubling is structurally ambiguous.
The correspondence diagram of a parse against an input treats a simplex name as all stem, and the copy of a reduplicated name as its reduplicant.
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.Parse.correspondence input (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex form) = OptimalityTheory.Correspondence.reduplication input form []
- BerentEtAl2016.Parse.correspondence input (BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated base) = OptimalityTheory.Correspondence.reduplication input base base
Instances For
The two levels of analysis #
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.instDecidableEqLevel x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The taught base x is the input at the morphological level only.
Equations
Instances For
The competitors for a doubled name XX and its control XY are the simplex parses at both levels, joined by the reduplicative parse at the morphological level.
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.candidates x y BerentEtAl2016.Level.phonology = [BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex [x, y], BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex [x, x]]
- BerentEtAl2016.candidates x y BerentEtAl2016.Level.morphology = [BerentEtAl2016.Parse.reduplicated [x], BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex [x, y], BerentEtAl2016.Parse.simplex [x, x]]
Instances For
The constraints #
DEP counts the constituents of the stem without a correspondent in the taught base. With no base taught, a name is its own input and DEP is vacuous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A simplex name adds to the base whatever it has beyond the base's length.
A reduplicated name adds to the taught base whatever its own base has beyond it, and its copy adds nothing.
The OCP counts the adjacent identical constituents within each morpheme.
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.ocp p = (List.map OptimalityTheory.Constraint.ocp p.morphemes).sum
Instances For
The OCP is inapplicable to a base and its copy, which are separate morphemes.
The competition between a doubled name and its control #
The OCP and DEP against the input of the level.
Equations
Instances For
The competition between XX and XY at a level, under a ranking of the OCP and DEP.
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.tableau x y l r = OptimalityTheory.Tableau.ofPerm (BerentEtAl2016.con x l) r (BerentEtAl2016.candidates x y l) ⋯
Instances For
At the phonological level the control wins under either ranking, because doubling is identity within a morpheme, which the OCP bans.
At the morphological level the reduplicative parse wins under either ranking, because it escapes the OCP and adds nothing to the base, while the control violates DEP.
Transfer from the spoken language #
The morphology of a spoken language as it bears on doubling, over meanings M.
- marked : Finset M
The meanings the language expresses by some morphological means.
- reduplicated : Finset M
The meanings the language expresses by reduplication.
- reduplicated_subset : self.reduplicated ⊆ self.marked
Reduplication is a morphological means.
Instances For
A speaker parses doubling with meaning f morphologically when the spoken language
gives positive evidence that morphology expresses f and no negative evidence that
reduplication cannot: if it reduplicates at all, it does so for f.
Equations
- l.Licenses f = (f ∈ l.marked ∧ (l.reduplicated.Nonempty → f ∈ l.reduplicated))
Instances For
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.SpokenLanguage.instDecidablePredLicensesOfDecidableEq x✝ = { decide := decide (x✝ ∈ l.marked) && decide (l.reduplicated.Nonempty → x✝ ∈ l.reduplicated), reflects_decide := ⋯ }
Reduplication for a meaning licenses it, which is positive transfer.
Reduplication for another meaning only withdraws the licence, which is negative transfer.
A language without reduplication licenses exactly the meanings it marks.
The level at which a speaker analyses a doubled name taught with meaning f.
Equations
- l.level f = if l.Licenses f then BerentEtAl2016.Level.morphology else BerentEtAl2016.Level.phonology
Instances For
Doubling is preferred exactly for the meanings the spoken language licenses, in that the winner surfaces as XX when the meaning is licensed and as XY otherwise.
English and Hebrew #
The meanings paired with doubled signs in experiments 6 and 10–12.
Instances For
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.instDecidableEqMeaning x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
English marks plurality, by suffixation (dog-s), has no productive diminutive, and reduplicates for nothing.
Equations
- BerentEtAl2016.english = { marked := {BerentEtAl2016.Meaning.plural}, reduplicated := ∅, reduplicated_subset := BerentEtAl2016.english._proof_1 }
Instances For
Hebrew marks plurality by suffixation (shir 'song', shirim 'songs') and diminution by reduplication (kelev 'dog', klavlav 'puppy'), which never marks plurality.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Licensing is not monotone in the morphology. Hebrew marks and reduplicates for everything English does, yet English speakers alone parse a doubled plural morphologically.
In the Language × Meaning interaction of experiments 6a and 10a–12a, English speakers prefer doubled plurals and Hebrew speakers doubled diminutives, under either ranking and for any constituents.