Documentation

Studies.ArnoldEtAl2000

Arnold, Wasow, Losongco & Ginstrom 2000: heaviness vs. newness #

Postverbal constituent order in English — heavy NP shift and the dative alternation — has been attributed to grammatical weight (Behaghel's law of growing constituents) and to discourse status (given before new), but the two are confounded: given referents get short expressions and new ones long. A corpus study of the Aligned-Hansard debates and an elicitation experiment in which directors instruct actors to give objects to toy animals measure heaviness as the difference in word count between the two constituents and newness by prior mention, and find that both factors independently shift the order, the newer and heavier constituent coming later, with neither reducible to the other. Their relative strength varies with the data: heaviness dominates where length differences are large, newness where the given referent has just been mentioned — a system of interacting constraints whose strength grows as the competing constraint weakens. Speakers' early disfluencies favour goal-first orders, so the postponement of new and heavy material serves planning as well as comprehension.

The two factors are read as weighted constraints over the two orders of a constituent pair: a graded penalty for putting the heavier constituent first, sized by the length difference the paper measures, and a penalty for putting a new constituent before a given one. The harmony difference between the orders is the weighted sum of the two signed preferences, which is the additive independence the paper reports; the paper's interaction is a matter of effect size in the data and is not represented.

Main definitions #

References #

Phrases, orderings, and candidates #

A constituent by the two measures the paper codes: word count and discourse status.

Instances For
    def ArnoldEtAl2000.instDecidableEqPhrase.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : Phrase) :
    Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
    Equations
    Instances For
      @[reducible, inline]

      A postverbal pair: theme and goal for the dative alternation, direct object and PP for heavy NP shift.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Which constituent comes last: themeLast is the double object or the shifted order, goalLast the prepositional dative or the canonical order.

        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          Equations

          The two constraints #

          The weight penalty: the number of words by which the first constituent exceeds the second — the relative length the paper measures.

          Equations
          Instances For
            def ArnoldEtAl2000.weights (wH wN : ℝ) :
            Fin 2 → ℝ

            The weights: wH for heaviness, wN for newness.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Signed preferences #

              Heaviness's preference for themeLast: the theme's length minus the goal's.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Newness's preference for themeLast: 1 when the theme is new and the goal given, -1 in the mirror case, 0 otherwise.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  theorem ArnoldEtAl2000.cast_sub_sub_cast_sub (a b : ℕ) :
                  ↑(a - b) - ↑(b - a) = ↑a - ↑b

                  The harmony difference between the two orders is the weighted sum of the two signed preferences.

                  The theme-last order wins exactly when the weighted preferences sum in its favour.

                  Independence #

                  theorem ArnoldEtAl2000.heaviness_alone {wH : ℝ} (hH : 0 < wH) (p : Pair) :

                  Heaviness alone places the heavier constituent last.

                  Newness alone places the new constituent after the given one.

                  theorem ArnoldEtAl2000.score_diff_add_word (wH wN : ℝ) (th gl : Phrase) :
                  HarmonicGrammar.harmonyScore con (weights wH wN) (({ words := th.words + 1, discourse := th.discourse }, gl), Order.themeLast) - HarmonicGrammar.harmonyScore con (weights wH wN) (({ words := th.words + 1, discourse := th.discourse }, gl), Order.goalLast) = HarmonicGrammar.harmonyScore con (weights wH wN) ((th, gl), Order.themeLast) - HarmonicGrammar.harmonyScore con (weights wH wN) ((th, gl), Order.goalLast) + wH

                  Weight effects are graded: lengthening the theme raises the harmony of the theme-last order by the heaviness weight per word.

                  theorem ArnoldEtAl2000.one_factor_decides (wH wN : ℝ) (p : Pair) :

                  When newness is neutral, heaviness decides; when weight is neutral, newness decides.

                  The paper's examples #

                  def ArnoldEtAl2000.words (s : String) :
                  ℕ

                  The number of words in a constituent as printed.

                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    def ArnoldEtAl2000.constituents (r : Datum) :
                    Option (ℕ × ℕ)

                    The word counts of a row's two constituents in surface order.

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      theorem ArnoldEtAl2000.rows_heavier_last (r : Datum) :
                      r ∈ Examples.all → r.feature? "exception" = none → ∀ c ∈ (constituents r).toList, c.1 ≤ c.2

                      In every corpus and text example the paper offers as ordered by weight, the heavier constituent comes last.

                      theorem ArnoldEtAl2000.rows_exceptions_lighter_last (r : Datum) :
                      r ∈ Examples.all → (r.feature? "exception").isSome = true → ∀ c ∈ (constituents r).toList, c.2 < c.1

                      The examples the paper sets aside — the announcer's That brings to the plate Barry Bonds and (17) — put the lighter constituent last: other factors, planning among them.