Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Hewett2026

Verbal Templates Can Influence L-Selection in Semitic #

Formalization of [Hew26] (Linguistic Inquiry 57(1), 197–215): l-selection — which preposition heads a verb's PP complement — varies by verbal template (binyan) in Tunisian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Hebrew. Neither the consonantal root nor the categorizing head varies across templates, so the data are problematic for root-based selection ([Har14b]) and categorizer-based selection ([Mer19a]) alike. Hewett's solution is joint selection via Activate (ex. (23), adapted from [Mer15]): a root's selectional feature is indexed by an ordered tuple of category features — for Semitic (V, Template) — and each c-commanding head strips one index; the feature determines the l-selected P only once fully activated.

Main declarations #

Implementation notes #

The Voice typing (SemiticTemplate.toVoiceHead), the bridges to [Kra96], [Woo15], and [Pyl08], and the verbal-decomposition rendering of mono-eventivity (fn. 11, [Nie20]) are this formalization's connections to the linglib Voice substrate, not claims of [Hew26], which deliberately leaves the template-head inventory open (fn. 8; p. 201: templates realize "a head or series of heads capable of inducing changes in adicity, presumably v/Voice"). Likewise the Mirror-Principle observation (templates_outside_mirror_scope): [Bak85] scopes the Mirror Principle to concatenative morphology, so templatic l-selection sits outside it — a linglib cross-reference Hewett does not draw.

Semitic verbal templates (binyanim) #

Semitic verbal templates (binyanim) attested in the paper's l-selection data. Realized as nonconcatenative vocalic patterns on consonantal roots (for the phonological CV-skeleton view see the template infrastructure in Studies/Faust2026.lean); syntactically they realize functional heads above the root.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Map each template to a canonical Voice head. Formalizer's bridge into the linglib Voice substrate: [Hew26] assumes only that templates realize a head or series of heads capable of inducing changes in adicity, presumably v/Voice (p. 201), and deliberately leaves the inventory open (fn. 8); the mapping below follows the templates' traditional active, causative, and medio-passive glosses.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The Voice flavor a template realizes, derived from toVoiceHead.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Templates are nonconcatenative, hence outside the Mirror Principle's scope as formalized by [Bak85]'s MorphDomain.InScope — a linglib cross-reference; [Hew26] does not discuss the Mirror Principle.

          Roots and prepositions #

          Consonantal roots with attested l-selection data, transliterated to ASCII-safe identifiers.

          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            def Hewett2026.instReprRootLabel.repr :
            RootLabelStd.Format
            Equations
            Instances For

              Prepositions attested in the paper's l-selection data.

              Instances For
                @[implicit_reducible]
                Equations
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Languages providing l-selection data in the paper.

                  Instances For
                    @[implicit_reducible]
                    Equations
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      L-selection data #

                      An l-selection datum: a root in a template selects a preposition, or none (bare transitive use or passive P-suppression).

                      Instances For
                        def Hewett2026.instReprLSelDatum.repr :
                        LSelDatumStd.Format
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Template-independent l-selection (ex. (11)): xwf 'fear' selects min 'from' in both XaYaZ (xa:f min l-ʔasad 'He was afraid of the lion') and XaYYaZ (xawwəf-u min l-ʔasad 'He made him afraid of the lion').

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            See xwf_XaYaZ.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Template-dependent l-selection (ex. (13a)): krh 'hate' is bare transitive in XaYaZ (kraht (*fi) Sami 'I hate Sami') but requires fi in XaYYaZ (karraht-ha *(fi) Sami 'I made her hate Sami').

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                See krh_XaYaZ.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Template-dependent l-selection (ex. (13b)): dwr 'encircle' selects bi: in XaYaZ (l-hnaʃ da:r bi:-k 'The snake encircled you') but ʕla in XaYYaZ (dawwart l-hnaʃ ʕli:-k 'I made the snake encircle you').

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    See dwr_XaYaZ.

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Direction-reversing case (ex. (14), Syrian Arabic): ħkm selects ʕalej in XaYaZ (hakam ʕalej-o b-s-sidʒn 'He sentenced him to jail') but rejects any PP in XaYYaZ (hakkam (l-muba:re:t) 'He refereed (the match)').

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        Hebrew P-suppression (ex. (17)): tpl 'treat' selects be in XiYeZ (tipel be-) and suppresses it in the passive XuYaZ (tupal).

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          Hebrew P-suppression (ex. (18)): ʃpʕ 'influence' selects al in hiXYiZ (hišpia al) and suppresses it in the passive huXYaZ (hušpa).

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            The pooled l-selection data (exx. (11), (13), (14), (17), (18)).

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Joint selection #

                                              L-selection as a joint function of root and template — the paper's core claim. none marks bare transitive use or passive P-suppression; unattested root–template pairs also map to none. xwf is generalized to all templates per the paper's claim that its l-selection is stable across templatic realizations of the root (p. 202).

                                              Equations
                                              Instances For

                                                lSelect agrees with every attested datum.

                                                Template-(in)dependence #

                                                templateInvariant is the prediction shared by root-only ([Har14b]) and categorizer-only ([Mer19a]) selection: since neither root nor categorizer varies across templates, l-selection should not either. The attested counterexamples refute it; xwf shows the invariant case also exists.

                                                Template-dependence cannot be reduced to homophonous roots (krh₁ in XaYaZ, krh₂ in XaYYaZ): that would leave their mutually exclusive distribution unexplained, parallel to the nonoverlapping distribution of suppletive go ~ went (p. 208). RootLabel accordingly carries a single krh constructor.

                                                L-selection for root r is constant across templates — the prediction both root-only and categorizer-only accounts make.

                                                Equations
                                                Instances For

                                                  xwf 'fear' is template-independent: min in every template (ex. (11)).

                                                  krh 'hate' refutes template-invariance: bare transitive in XaYaZ but fi in XaYYaZ (ex. (13a)) — the counterexample to [Har14b]'s root-level l-selection.

                                                  dwr 'encircle' refutes template-invariance with two distinct prepositions: bi: in XaYaZ vs ʕla in XaYYaZ (ex. (13b)) — an independent counterexample to [Mer19a]'s categorizer-level l-selection.

                                                  ħkm refutes template-invariance in the reverse direction: PP in XaYaZ, none in XaYYaZ (ex. (14)).

                                                  theorem Hewett2026.cSelection_vs_lSelection :
                                                  (∀ (r : RootClassification) (c1 c2 : Morphology.DM.Categorizer), { root := r, categorizer := c1 }.root.arity = { root := r, categorizer := c2 }.root.arity) ∃ (r : RootLabel), ¬templateInvariant r

                                                  C-selection (arity) is root-level ([Har14b]; see complement_selection_at_root_level in Categorizer.lean) but l-selection is not: the two kinds of selection factor differently in the grammar.

                                                  Verbalized roots #

                                                  A root that has been categorized as a verb and placed in a template — the structure that jointly determines l-selection. Bridges CategorizedRoot (categorizer side) and the template's Voice contribution.

                                                  Instances For
                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For

                                                      The l-selected preposition, derived from root and template.

                                                      Equations
                                                      Instances For

                                                        The Voice flavor, determined by the template rather than the root.

                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For
                                                          theorem Hewett2026.arity_template_invariant (cr : Morphology.DM.CategorizedRoot) (rl : RootLabel) (t1 t2 : SemiticTemplate) :
                                                          { categorized := cr, template := t1, rootLabel := rl }.categorized.root.arity = { categorized := cr, template := t2, rootLabel := rl }.categorized.root.arity

                                                          Arity is template-invariant (root-level), unlike l-selection: c-selection and l-selection factor differently in the grammar.

                                                          Template-to-Voice correspondence #

                                                          Formalizer's bridge (see the module docstring): the template determines the Voice head merged above the verbalized root, and that functional structure — above the selectional domain — is what varies across templates while root and categorizer stay fixed.

                                                          The basic active template maps to θ-assigning (agentive) Voice.

                                                          Causative templates map to θ-assigning (causer) Voice.

                                                          Passive templates map to non-θ-assigning Voice — the structural basis for Hebrew P-suppression under passivization (exx. (17b), (18b)).

                                                          XaYaZ and XaYYaZ differ in Voice contribution (agentive vs causer): the functional structure above the selectional domain varies even when root and categorizer do not.

                                                          [Kra96]'s severing instantiated for Semitic: root-level arity is template-invariant while the Voice contribution varies by template.

                                                          Cross-linguistic Voice coverage #

                                                          Formalizer's bridge, not content of [Hew26] (which cites [Woo15] only in passing, as a language where Voice is overt): Semitic templates and Icelandic -st relate to Voice differently. Each Semitic template realizes a single Voice flavor (including the θ-assigning ones); -st is a clitic that merely co-occurs with a Voice flavor without realizing it ([Woo15]). Read as coverage sets over VoiceFlavor, the Semitic image and the set of flavors -st appears with overlap on the non-thematic and agentive flavors (the latter because -st appears in agentive figure reflexives) but diverge elsewhere. The Icelandic set is derived from [Woo15]'s Construction.voiceFlavor, so the theorem relates the two studies' actual mappings.

                                                          The Voice flavors Semitic templates realize: the image of toVoiceFlavor.

                                                          Equations
                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                          Instances For

                                                            Every template's flavor is in the Semitic coverage set.

                                                            The host-clause Voice flavors Icelandic -st co-occurs with, derived from [Woo15]'s Construction.voiceFlavor.

                                                            Equations
                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Every -st configuration's flavor is in the Icelandic coverage set (inherent and reciprocal reuse flavors of the four representatives).

                                                              The two coverage sets overlap on .nonThematic (Semitic medio-passive, Icelandic anticausative -st) and .agentive (Semitic active templates, Icelandic figure reflexives — -st co-occurs with agentive Voice); Semitic alone realizes the causer and passive flavors, Icelandic -st alone appears with the expletive Voice of the generic middle.

                                                              The Semitic XaYaZ ~ tXaYYaZ alternation instantiates [Kra96]'s causative alternation: toVoiceHead maps the two templates to the canonical heads, so the Semitic statement is Kratzer1996.causative_pair_voice_contrast.

                                                              Template → Voice → applicative licensing #

                                                              Formalizer's bridge to [Pyl08] (not cited by [Hew26]): high applicatives require Voice with event semantics, low applicatives are unconditional. Pulled back along toVoiceHead, the Voice-predicate chain assignsTheta ⊂ hasSemantics = licenses high Appl ⊂ licenses low Appl = ⊤ yields: +θ templates ⊊ high-Appl-licensing templates ⊊ all templates. The general inclusions live in the substrate (VoiceHead.AssignsTheta.hasSemantics, high_licensed_of_assignsTheta, low_licensed_with_any); this section instantiates them for the Semitic template space, paralleling the Icelandic asymmetry in Wood2015.dative_voice_asymmetry.

                                                              Does this template license a given applicative type? Composes the substrate's ApplHead.Licensed with toVoiceHead.

                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For

                                                                High-Appl licensing factors through HasSemantics.

                                                                A template that blocks high applicatives assigns no θ — via the substrate implication, not template enumeration.

                                                                A θ-assigning template licenses every applicative type.

                                                                The Voice-predicate chain pulled back to the Semitic template space; both inclusions are strict: nXaYaZ licenses high Appl without assigning θ, and tXaYYaZ blocks high Appl.

                                                                Feature activation #

                                                                [Hew26] ex. (23) (adapted from [Mer15]): Activate(X,Y;F) — X bears a category feature c; Y bears an inactive feature F^C with C = (c₁,...,cₙ) an ordered tuple. If c = c₁, Activate strips c₁; when the tuple is exhausted, F is fully active. For Semitic l-selection the tuple is (V, Template): the categorizing head strips the first index, the template-defining head the second. The tuple machinery is ActivationIndex from Checking.lean.

                                                                Activation keys for Semitic l-selection: the activation tuple mixes syntactic categories (stripped by the categorizing head) and template identities (stripped by the template-defining head).

                                                                Instances For
                                                                  Equations
                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                  Instances For
                                                                    @[implicit_reducible]

                                                                    BEq via decide so that activation reduces definitionally on concrete keys (ActivationIndex requires [BEq α]).

                                                                    Equations

                                                                    A selectional feature indexed by an ordered activation tuple ([Hew26] ex. (23)): selectedP becomes visible to selection only once activation is exhausted.

                                                                    Instances For
                                                                      Equations
                                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        The feature's lifecycle status, via ActivationIndex.toStatus.

                                                                        Equations
                                                                        Instances For

                                                                          Attempt to activate with the given key (matching left-to-right stripping, via ActivationIndex.activate).

                                                                          Equations
                                                                          Instances For

                                                                            A dormant feature indexed by (V, T): needs V then T to activate.

                                                                            Equations
                                                                            Instances For

                                                                              Activating with a non-matching key (template before V) is a no-op: ex. (23) strips only when the key matches the leftmost index.

                                                                              Worked derivation (exx. (24)–(25)) #

                                                                              The root dwr carries one selectional feature per template pairing ([Hew26] exx. (24)–(25)): [SEL: bi^(V, XaYaZ)] selects bi: when activated by V and XaYaZ.

                                                                              Equations
                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                Ex. (24), dar b- 'encircled': V strips .cat .v from both features; XaYaZ then strips the template key from the bi: feature only (template mismatch leaves the ʕla feature inactive), and the active feature matches lSelect.

                                                                                Ex. (25), dawwər ʕla 'made encircle': same root, different template — XaYYaZ activates the ʕla feature and leaves the bi: feature inactive.

                                                                                Mono-eventive causatives #

                                                                                Fn. 11 (p. 204): XaYYaZ causatives reject conflicting temporal adverbials, which [Hew26] takes to show they are mono-eventive, assuming with [Nie20] that morphological causatives are crosslinguistically mono-eventive. The decompositions below render this in the local VerbHead substrate — the formalizer's encoding, not the paper's ([Nie20]'s own analysis is Voice-over-Voice, not a subevent inventory).

                                                                                Mono-eventive causative decomposition: θ-assigning Voice over a root structure lacking the becoming subevent vGO.

                                                                                Equations
                                                                                Instances For

                                                                                  Bi-eventive causative decomposition (analytic causatives): θ-assigning Voice over the full change-of-state root structure.

                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                    Mono-eventive causatives are not standard causatives (which require the vGO becoming subevent).

                                                                                    Bi-eventive causatives are standard causatives.

                                                                                    Summary #

                                                                                    Main result: l-selection is a function of root and template jointly — template-dependent and template-independent roots both exist, so neither root alone ([Har14b]) nor categorizer alone ([Mer19a]) determines it.