Linking Theory Predictions → Hand-Annotated θ-Roles #
Two accounts of argument realization make predictions about external
argument theta roles. The two predicates live next to the types they
project from: severing in VoiceFlavor.thetaRole
(Syntax/Minimalist/Verbal/Voice.lean) and lexicalist in
Verb.predictedSubjectTheta
(Semantics/Lexical/VerbEntry.lean). Both operate over proto-role
entailment profiles (subjectEntailments / objectEntailments) rather
than the legacy subjectTheta / objectTheta labels (which were
removed from Verb). Studies comparing the two accounts apply both
predicates to the same Verb and inspect divergence; the
LinkingTheory packaging that previously lived in VoiceTheta.lean
was dissolved as having no remaining consumers.
Account 1: Severing #
Voice flavor determines the theta role: Voice_AG → agent, Voice_CAUSE → stimulus. The current Voice typology has only two θ-assigning flavors, so it cannot distinguish experiencer from agent or theme from internal- arg derivation.
Account 2: Lexicalist ([Lev93], [RHL98]) #
The verb's lexical semantics — attitude, causalSource, factivePresup, levinClass, unaccusative, controlType, and proto-role entailments — determines the theta role, bypassing Voice.
This file retains only the causative-alternation tree derivations
(Part III); per-verb θ-role comparison theorems were removed with the
subjectTheta / objectTheta fields.
The causative alternation is the structural prediction of Voice
severing: transitive "John broke the vase" has agentive Voice with an
agent in Spec,VoiceP; anticausative "The vase broke" has non-thematic
Voice with no specifier. Both share the same VP core. Event-structure
predictions are verified in Core/Voice.lean via buildDecomposition.
Equations
- Kratzer1996.voice_ag_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.Voice [Minimalist.Cat.v] "Voice[AG]", id := 200 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.voice_nth_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.Voice [Minimalist.Cat.v] "Voice[∅]", id := 210 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.voice_mid_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.Voice [Minimalist.Cat.v] "Voice[MID]", id := 211 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.v_head_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.v [Minimalist.Cat.V] "v", id := 201 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.V_broke_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.V [Minimalist.Cat.D] "broke", id := 212 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.V_sank_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.V [Minimalist.Cat.D] "sank", id := 213 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.V_opened_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.V [Minimalist.Cat.D] "opened", id := 214 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.DP_john_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.D [] "John", id := 206 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.DP_vase_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.D [] "the vase", id := 215 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.DP_ship_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.D [] "the ship", id := 216 }
Instances For
Equations
- Kratzer1996.DP_door_t = { item := Minimalist.LexicalItem.simple Minimalist.Cat.D [] "the door", id := 217 }
Instances For
Transitive: "John broke the vase"
[VoiceP John [Voice' Voice_AG [vP v [VP broke [DP the vase]]]]]
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Anticausative: "The vase broke"
[VoiceP Voice_∅ [vP v [VP broke [DP the vase]]]]
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Unaccusative: "The ship sank"
[VoiceP Voice_∅ [vP v [VP sank [DP the ship]]]]
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Middle: "The door opened"
[VoiceP Voice_MID [vP v [VP opened [DP the door]]]]
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Agent c-commands theme in the transitive.
Theme does NOT c-command agent.
Anticausative contains theme but no agent DP.
Unaccusative contains theme.
Middle contains theme.
The transitive has an agent DP; the anticausative does not.
Voice determines the alternation: agentive assigns θ, non-thematic does not. This is [Kra96]'s severing verified structurally on the tree derivations.