Dayal (2025): Three-layer cartography for clause-typing #
Veneeta Dayal (2025), Linguistic Inquiry 56(4):663-712. Develops the
three-layer cartographic split [SAP [PerspP [CP ...]]] and uses it to
account for cross-linguistic clause-typing variation, the responsive/
rogative split, and McCloskey-style quasi-subordination.
This study file is the canonical home for:
- Clause-typing typology (§4.4): forced-CP vs delayed-PerspP variation across English/Italian/Hindi-Urdu.
- Hindi-Urdu shiftiness (§3.2): the McCloskey parallel for Hindi-Urdu jaanna:.
- Newari conjunct/disjunct (§5.2): the perspective-shift evidence from Newari person marking.
- Left-Periphery bridge: the verification of the LeftPeriphery
SelectionClassapparatus against the English embedding data (§5) and the cross-linguistic shiftiness data.
Cross-framework relations #
- Rizzi 1997 /
Syntax/Minimalist/Questions.leanplaces clause-typing atForce⁰[+Q]; Dayal places it atCwith a downstreamPerspPshift. The disagreement is real and not currently formalized as a bridge theorem. SeeSyntax/Minimalist/Questions.lean. - Holmberg 2016 /
Studies/Holmberg2016.leanplaces the polar-Q-typing locus atPolP(via theFeatures/AnsweringSystem.leantypological parameter). Holmberg's analysis competes with Dayal's for the same matrix-polar facts. - Speas-Tenny /
Studies/SpeasTenny2003.leanderivesSpeasTenny2003.seatOfKnowledgefrom a 2×2 feature matrix; Dayal places SoK in PerspP with PRO. Both predict the Newari conjunct/disjunct flip; the bridge theoremSpeasTenny2003.seatOfKnowledge ↔ PerspP-PRO over Newariis unformalized.
How a language handles clause-typing for polar questions. The contrast
is the cartographic locus of [+Q]-typing, not a difference in feature
inventory. CP-typed languages license simplex polars in subordination
via a wh-complementizer (English whether, Italian se); PerspP-typed
languages route polar questions through a higher PerspP layer that does
not embed under canonical responsive predicates.
- cpTyped : ClauseTypingStrategy
Clause-typing locus is
C(Englishwhether, Italianse). - perspPTyped : ClauseTypingStrategy
Clause-typing locus is
PerspP(Hindi-Urdu rising intonation).
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.instDecidableEqClauseTypingStrategy x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Structural projection: which clause-typing strategies license simplex
polar questions in subordination. CP-typed languages do (the wh-
complementizer is the embedding selector); PerspP-typed languages do
not (PerspP is too high to be selected by canonical responsive verbs).
delayed_blocks_simplex_subordination below derives from this
projection together with the Fragment data, rather than holding
vacuously over a 1-element sample.
Equations
Instances For
Data on simplex polar question embedding across languages. A simplex polar question is just the nucleus p (no "or not").
- language : String
- clauseTyping : ClauseTypingStrategy
- matrixOk : Bool
Simplex polar in matrix?
- quasiSubOk : Bool
Simplex polar in quasi-subordination?
- subordinationOk : Bool
Simplex polar in subordination?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.instReprSimplexPolarDatum = { reprPrec := Dayal2025.instReprSimplexPolarDatum.repr }
Equations
- Dayal2025.english_simplex = { language := "English", clauseTyping := Dayal2025.ClauseTypingStrategy.cpTyped, matrixOk := true, quasiSubOk := true, subordinationOk := true }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.italian_simplex = { language := "Italian", clauseTyping := Dayal2025.ClauseTypingStrategy.cpTyped, matrixOk := true, quasiSubOk := true, subordinationOk := true }
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: simplex polar questions require PerspP (rising intonation activates [+WH] at PerspP level). No wh-complementizer → cannot clause-type at C. (Dayal 2025: ex (70)–(71); UNVERIFIED page numbers.)
Equations
- Dayal2025.hindi_urdu_simplex = { language := "Hindi-Urdu", clauseTyping := Dayal2025.ClauseTypingStrategy.perspPTyped, matrixOk := true, quasiSubOk := true, subordinationOk := false }
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
The Fragment data is consistent with the structural projection: every
PerspP-typed language in the sample lacks simplex-polar subordination.
Unlike a 1-direction stipulation, this connects per-language data to a
typed projection on ClauseTypingStrategy.
Corollary: PerspP-typed languages cannot subordinate simplex polars. Now derived from the structural projection, not from the data alone.
Whether declarative questions in a language are obligatorily biased.
English: "You drink wine?" is obligatorily biased (speaker expects yes).
Hindi-Urdu/Italian: rising declaratives can be neutral.
This follows from whether clause-typing is forced at C (CP-typed) or
routed through PerspP. (Italian neutralOk := true is contested in
the rising-declarative literature, e.g. Gunlogson 2003 vs Bartels 1999;
Dayal 2025 makes the specific claim — UNVERIFIED page numbers.)
- language : String
- neutralOk : Bool
Can a rising declarative be a neutral (unbiased) question?
- obligatorilyBiased : Bool
Is a rising declarative always biased?
- clauseTyping : ClauseTypingStrategy
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- Dayal2025.english_decl_q = { language := "English", neutralOk := false, obligatorilyBiased := true, clauseTyping := Dayal2025.ClauseTypingStrategy.cpTyped }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.hindi_urdu_decl_q = { language := "Hindi-Urdu", neutralOk := true, obligatorilyBiased := false, clauseTyping := Dayal2025.ClauseTypingStrategy.perspPTyped }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.italian_decl_q = { language := "Italian", neutralOk := true, obligatorilyBiased := false, clauseTyping := Dayal2025.ClauseTypingStrategy.cpTyped }
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Cross-linguistic shiftiness data. Parallels McCloskey's English data. Hindi-Urdu kya: shows the same pattern as English embedded inversion: blocked under bare responsive, licensed under negation/questioning.
- language : String
- verb : String
- sentence : String
- negated : Bool
- questioned : Bool
- quasiSubOk : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Hindi-Urdu: "want to know" (rogative) freely takes kya: (Dayal 2025: ex (39a)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "know" (responsive) rejects kya: (Dayal 2025: ex (39b)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "nobody knows" + kya: → OK (negation, Dayal 2025: ex (41a)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "does anyone know" + kya: → OK (questioning, Dayal 2025: ex (41b)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
English: bare responsive remember rejects embedded inversion ([McC06]).
Equations
- Dayal2025.remember_bare = { language := "English", verb := "remember", sentence := "*I remember [was Henry a communist↑]", negated := false, questioned := false, quasiSubOk := false }
Instances For
English: negated remember licenses embedded inversion ([McC06]).
Equations
- Dayal2025.remember_negated = { language := "English", verb := "remember", sentence := "I don't remember [was Henry a communist↑]", negated := true, questioned := false, quasiSubOk := true }
Instances For
English: questioned remember licenses embedded inversion ([McC06]).
Equations
- Dayal2025.remember_questioned = { language := "English", verb := "remember", sentence := "Does Sue remember [was Henry a communist↑]", negated := false, questioned := true, quasiSubOk := true }
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu shiftiness parallels English: bare responsive blocks quasi-sub, negation and questioning license it.
Newari uses conjunct vs disjunct verb forms sensitive to whether the subject is coindexed with the perspectival center (Seat of Knowledge).
- Declaratives: conjunct = 1st person subject (SoK = speaker)
- Interrogatives: conjunct = 2nd person subject (SoK = addressee) This provides independent evidence for perspective shift in questions (canonical Newari conjunct/disjunct pattern; Zu 2018 reanalyses as perspective shift).
- language : String
- clauseType : String
- conjunctPerson : String
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.newari_declarative = { language := "Newari", clauseType := "declarative", conjunctPerson := "1st" }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.newari_interrogative = { language := "Newari", clauseType := "interrogative", conjunctPerson := "2nd" }
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Embedding judgment for an English attitude predicate ([Day25]: §§1–3).
- verb : String
- subordination : Bool
"V whether/who..."
- quasiSubordination : Bool
"V [did S leave↑]" (embedded inversion + matrix intonation)
- quotation : Bool
'V, "Did S leave?"'
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.instReprEmbeddingDatum = { reprPrec := Dayal2025.instReprEmbeddingDatum.repr }
Equations
- Dayal2025.investigate_d = { verb := "investigate", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := false, quotation := false }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.depend_on_d = { verb := "depend on", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := false, quotation := false }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.wonder_d = { verb := "wonder", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := true, quotation := false }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.ask_d = { verb := "ask", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := true, quotation := true }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.know_d = { verb := "know", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := false, quotation := false }
Instances For
Predicate of Relevance: responsive but resists question-to-proposition
reduction ([EKSU17]). The reduction-resistance is a separate
property — see Elliott2017.
Equations
- Dayal2025.care_d = { verb := "care", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := false, quotation := false }
Instances For
Predicate of Relevance ([EKSU17]).
Equations
- Dayal2025.matter_d = { verb := "matter", subordination := true, quasiSubordination := false, quotation := false }
Instances For
Equations
- Dayal2025.believe_d = { verb := "believe", subordination := false, quasiSubordination := false, quotation := false }
Instances For
Quasi-subordination implies subordination ([Day25]).
Quotation implies quasi-subordination ([Day25]).
Classify each empirical embedding datum.
Equations
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "investigate" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativeCP
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "depend on" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativeCP
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "wonder" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativePerspP
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "ask" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativeSAP
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "know" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "care" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "matter" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb "believe" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.uninterrogative
- Dayal2025.classifyVerb x✝ = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.uninterrogative
Instances For
The theory correctly predicts all embedding judgments from the data.
Shiftiness predictions match McCloskey's data for remember (responsive).
Classify Hindi-Urdu verbs from the cross-linguistic shiftiness data.
Equations
- Dayal2025.classifyCrossLingVerb "ja:n-na: ca:h-na: (want to know)" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativePerspP
- Dayal2025.classifyCrossLingVerb "ja:n-na: (know)" = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Dayal2025.classifyCrossLingVerb x✝ = Minimalist.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu shiftiness follows the same derivation as English: responsive predicates reject quasi-sub in bare form, allow under negation/questioning. The theory predicts ALL cross-linguistic data.
Q-particle embedding follows from which left-peripheral layer they occupy:
CP-layer particles are licensed in subordination, PerspP- and SAP-layer
particles are not, and SAP-layer particles are excluded even from
quasi-subordination. Stated over layerOf, which derives the layer from
the embedding facet, so this is the kernel-checked converse guarantee for
the study's particle sample.
The structurally derived classification matches the manually-assigned string-based classification for all verbs in the embedding data.
String-based classification matches field-based derivation.