Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Cacchioli2025

[Cac25] — Empirical Data [Cac25] #

Pure empirical data from [Cac25] "The Syntax of Clausal Prefixes in Tigrinya." No theory imports — this file contains only observed patterns, grammaticality judgments, and co-occurrence restrictions.

Key observations #

  1. Four prefixes: zɨ-, kɨ-, kəmzi-, ʔay-...-n
  2. Complementary distribution: No two prefixes co-occur
  3. Verb class selection: The matrix verb determines which prefix appears
  4. Fixed linear order: Prefix always precedes the verbal complex
  5. Agreement asymmetry: kɨ- and ʔay-...-n take agreement; zɨ- and kəmzi- don't

The four clausal prefixes attested in Tigrinya.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A grammaticality judgment for a prefix combination. true = grammatical, false = ungrammatical.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          Instances For

            No two prefixes can co-occur (complementary distribution).

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              All prefix combinations are ungrammatical (complementary distribution).

              A selection datum: a matrix verb selects a particular prefix.

              • verb : String
              • verbGloss : String
              • verbClass : String
              • selectedPrefix : TigrinyaPrefix
              • example_ : String
              • grammatical : Bool
              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Verb class selection data from [Cac25].

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Agreement data: which prefixes take agreement suffixes.

                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Map CTP reality status to [±finite] selection.

                              Realis CTPs (utterance, knowledge, commentative,...) select [+finite] complements — indicative/realis clauses whose Fin head bears [+finite].

                              Irrealis CTPs (desiderative, manipulative, modal,...) select [-finite] complements — subjunctive/irrealis clauses whose Fin head bears [-finite].

                              Some classes are variable (perception can take both finite and non-finite complements), so they return none.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Map CTP class to [±factive] selection.

                                Factive CTPs presuppose the truth of their complement; their Force/C head bears [+factive]. Non-factive CTPs don't, bearing [-factive].

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Knowledge verbs select [+finite] (indicative) complements.

                                  Desiderative verbs select [-finite] (subjunctive/irrealis) complements.

                                  Knowledge verbs select [+factive] complements.

                                  Utterance verbs select [-factive] complements.

                                  Irrealis CTP classes map to [-finite].

                                  theorem Cacchioli2025.irrealis_always_nonfinite (c : CTPClass) (b : Bool) (h : ctpToFiniteness c = some b) (hr : ctpRealityStatus c = RealityStatus.irrealis) :
                                  b = false

                                  Irrealis CTP classes always map to [-finite] when they have a value. The converse (realis → [+finite]) does not hold universally: phasal verbs are realis but take non-finite complements.

                                  Cross-paper divergence theorem: phasal CTPs witness the failure of the realis ↔ finite correspondence. [Noo07] §3.1.1 puts phasal complements in DTR, but the substrate's ctpRealityStatus classifies them as realis (event is asserted as actual). Cacchioli's feature-based analysis classifies the same complements as [-finite] (reduced). The contradiction makes visible a real Noonan- internal tension between the realis-as-asserted-fact criterion and the DTR → irrealis groupings of Table 2.3.

                                  The witness: phasal is realis AND takes non-finite (irrealis-aligned) complements. Any unification forcing realis ↔ +finite would have to reclassify either Noonan's reality status of phasal or Cacchioli's finiteness assignment.

                                  [Cac25]'s cartographic head assignment for the four prefixes ([Riz97] split CP): zɨ- spells out Rel, kɨ- Fin, kəmzi- Force, ʔay- Neg. Paper-specific analysis projected over the framework-neutral fragment entries.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    kɨ- (Fin) is at the IP/CP boundary (F3).

                                    kəmzi- (Force) is at the clause-typing level (F6).

                                    ʔay-...-n (Neg) is in the inflectional domain (F2).

                                    Fragment agreement field matches empirical data for each prefix.

                                    Knowledge verbs select [+finite] → predicts kəmzi- (factive).

                                    Desiderative verbs select [-finite] → predicts kɨ- (subjunctive).

                                    Commentative verbs select [+finite] → predicts kəmzi- (factive).

                                    Manipulative verbs select [-finite] → predicts kɨ- (subjunctive).

                                    The negative circumfix surfaces correctly for a sample verb.

                                    The negative circumfix gloss is derived from the fragment entry.

                                    [Cac25]'s extension of [Bon22]'s Cont-exponence paradigm: kemzi as Tigrinya's overt Cont exponent (the 2025 comparison, so it lives here per the chronology rule).

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For