Türk and Hirsch (2026): Constraining Alternatives in Turkish Polar Questions #
This file formalizes [TH26], an argument from Turkish polar questions that focus
alternatives are formed in the syntax under a category constraint. Turkish polar questions carry
the focus clitic =mI, which by default attaches to a focused covert polarity head Σ, (4), and
[Atl23] derives the Hamblin set of the question from focus alternatives: Σ has the identity
as ordinary value and the identity and negation as focus value, the alternatives propagate
pointwise, and a question head C_Q sets the ordinary value of the clause to the focus value of its
prejacent, hamblinSet. The two alternatives of Σ are assumed rather than derived. Under
[Roo85]'s type-theoretic alternatives Σ_F is the F-marked identity,
WithAlternatives.focused, whose focus value is every propositional operator, so the Hamblin
set is every proposition, hamblinType_eq_univ, and [Day96]'s answerhood
operator, which selects the strongest true member, returns total information about the world,
isStrongestTrueAnswer_hamblinType; on the sample (31), which adds the deontic modal
propositions, it returns the conjunction that Ali had to sleep and did, (35b), rather than the
attested complete answer (35a), isStrongestTrueAnswer_sample. Contextual restriction cannot
repair this, since any Hamblin set at all is the intersection of the type-theoretic focus value
with some context, exists_context_inter_eq, whereas the modalized question (38) is unavailable
even in the supporting context (39). Instead alternatives are syntactic objects formed under the
Category Match Constraint (42), [FK11], [Kat07]: replacements of the focus share
its category, which is the terminal clause of the substrate's syntactic composition
Tree.withAlternatives, so Σ_F is that composition interpreted, sigmaCat. With Σ and NEG the
only morphemes of category Pol, the Hamblin set is the polar one, withAlternatives_sigma,
hamblinCat_eq, hamblinCat_eq_alt_polar, Dayal's operator returns the positive or the
negative answer, isStrongestTrueAnswer_hamblinCat, and the modal answer (41) is not a member,
mem_hamblinCat_iff. No structural-complexity constraint is involved: the category-match
alternatives are substitutions at the focus, hence structural alternatives of [Kat07]
without any bound, Tree.alternatives_withAlternatives_subset.
Implementation notes #
Propositions are sets of worlds. Σ and NEG are the positive and the negative Polarity, and
denote its action on propositions, the identity and complementation. The deontic modal is
Modality.necessity over a modal base and an ordering source. The lexicon is a finite set of
terminals of PhraseStructure.Tree, so that category match is the terminal clause of
Tree.withAlternatives; the denotation of a tree is its terminal's operator and the identity
elsewhere. Two-dimensional values are WithAlternatives, whose <*> is pointwise functional
application. =mI itself is vacuous and does not enter the composition. The embedding data,
(14) and (18), in which =mI below the complementizer diye yields a declarative matrix clause
and =mI above it a matrix question, so that =mI tracks the highest focus mark, are recorded
as rows and not modelled. The examples are the rows of Data.Examples.TurkHirsch2026.
References #
The polar morphemes and the deontic modal #
The syntactic categories are the polarity category of Σ and NEG and that of the deontic modal.
Instances For
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.instDecidableEqCat x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.instReprCat.repr TurkHirsch2026.Cat.pol prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "TurkHirsch2026.Cat.pol")).group prec✝
- TurkHirsch2026.instReprCat.repr TurkHirsch2026.Cat.modal prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "TurkHirsch2026.Cat.modal")).group prec✝
Instances For
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.instReprCat = { reprPrec := TurkHirsch2026.instReprCat.repr }
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.instDecidableEqWord.decEq (TurkHirsch2026.Word.polarity a) (TurkHirsch2026.Word.polarity b) = if h : a = b then h ▸ isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
- TurkHirsch2026.instDecidableEqWord.decEq (TurkHirsch2026.Word.polarity s) TurkHirsch2026.Word.deontic = isFalse ⋯
- TurkHirsch2026.instDecidableEqWord.decEq TurkHirsch2026.Word.deontic (TurkHirsch2026.Word.polarity s) = isFalse ⋯
- TurkHirsch2026.instDecidableEqWord.decEq TurkHirsch2026.Word.deontic TurkHirsch2026.Word.deontic = isTrue ⋯
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.instReprWord = { reprPrec := TurkHirsch2026.instReprWord.repr }
The operator a word denotes. A polarity head acts on propositions, so that Σ is the identity and NEG complementation, and the deontic modal is necessity over the modal base and ordering source.
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.Word.den f g (TurkHirsch2026.Word.polarity s) = fun (x : Set W) => s • x
- TurkHirsch2026.Word.den f g TurkHirsch2026.Word.deontic = fun (p : Set W) => {w : W | Modality.necessity f g (fun (x : W) => x ∈ p) w}
Instances For
A tree denotes its terminal's operator, and the identity elsewhere.
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.den f g (RoseTree.node (PhraseStructure.Tree.Label.terminal a w) []) = TurkHirsch2026.Word.den f g w
- TurkHirsch2026.den f g x✝ = id
Instances For
The lexicon of propositional operators (44) has Σ and NEG of category Pol and the deontic modal of its own category.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The focused polarity head Σ_F.
Equations
Instances For
Composing the question #
Σ_F with focus value A is the two-dimensional value ⟨id, A⟩, (8a); the TP applies it
pointwise to the unfocused prejacent, (9), and C_Q returns the focus value of its prejacent as
the Hamblin set, (10). Type-theoretic alternatives make Σ_F the F-marked identity,
WithAlternatives.focused id; category match makes it the interpretation of the syntactic
composition Tree.withAlternatives over the lexicon.
The Hamblin set of the question formed on Σ_F with two-dimensional value m is the focus
value of the TP m <*> pure p, (9) and (10).
Equations
- TurkHirsch2026.hamblinSet m p = (m <*> pure p).alternatives
Instances For
Type-theoretic alternatives over-generate #
The Hamblin set under [Roo85]'s type-theoretic focus value, every operator of Σ's type (26), where Σ_F is the F-marked identity.
Equations
Instances For
The type-theoretic Hamblin set is every proposition (28).
Under type-theoretic alternatives the complete answer at w is total information about
w, so the responder must supply every true proposition.
The sample of the Hamblin set with the deontic propositions (31).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
At a world where Ali had to sleep and slept (34), the strongest true member of the sample is the conjunction that he had to sleep and did, the over-informative answer (35b).
Any Hamblin set whatever is the type-theoretic focus value restricted by some context (36), so restriction by context alone cannot exclude the modalized question (38).
Category match #
Under the Category Match Constraint (42), Σ_F evokes its same-category replacements from the
lexicon, the terminal clause of the substrate's syntactic composition, so its two-dimensional
value is the interpretation of Tree.withAlternatives.
Equations
Instances For
The category-match alternatives of Σ_F are Σ and NEG (45).
The Hamblin set under category match.
Equations
Instances For
Under category match the Hamblin set is the polar one, (23).
The category-match Hamblin set is the alternative set of the polar interrogative.
A proposition is a member of the category-match Hamblin set only as the positive or the negative answer (41); the modal answer is excluded as soon as it differs from both.
Under category match the complete answer is the positive answer when it is true (35a).
And the negative answer when the positive one is false.