Documentation

Studies.SarvasyAikhenvald2025

Sarvasy & Aikhenvald (2025): Clause Chaining in the Languages of the World #

This file formalizes the typological generalizations of the volume's introduction over the clause-chaining systems of four of its languages. A clause chain is a sequence of medial clauses, formally dependent and underspecified for inflectional categories, closed by one independent clause, and the introduction surveys the parameters along which chaining varies: the switch-reference marking of many medial-final languages, the categories medial verbs retain, the relations medial forms encode, the two bridging constructions and the non-canonical uses of medial clauses. The sample (Language) is Nungon and Manambu, whose chapters describe switch-reference systems, and Korean and Turkish, which chain without switch-reference; each language's medial forms are its fragment's carrier (Language.Forms), and its retention profile (Language.medialMorph), bridging constructions (Language.bridging) and stand-alone medial clauses (Language.MedialStandsAlone) are read off the forms where the forms decide them and are the chapters' reports otherwise. The generalizations proved are that same-subject medial forms leave the subject unindexed while different-subject forms index it (ss_forms_lack_subject_marking), that Manambu's switch-reference markers each encode a temporal or logical relation whereas Nungon's mark subject continuity alone, the temporal relation coming from a switch-reference-neutral construction (relations_fused_with_sr), that the chain's tense comes from the final verb in the two Papuan languages while Korean admits tense before some medial suffixes (tense_from_final_verb), that Turkish negates medial clauses individually (negated_individually), that the medial verbs of both are converbs (converb_form), and that in the sample switch-reference goes with the loss or reduction of medial tense (sr_and_tense).

Implementation notes #

The Korean and Turkish inventories come from reference grammars rather than the volume, whose introduction discusses both languages; the volume's Turkish suffix list adds the two converbial subordinators on a doubled verb, which the fragment records outside its carrier. Nungon's medial polarity is the earlier formalization's value, which chapter 7 does not settle. Ku Waru and Korowai, formerly in the sample, are dropped: the former has no chapter in the volume and the latter's switch-reference system was misrecorded as tracking several arguments.

References #

The sample #

The four languages.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[instance_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      @[instance_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      @[instance_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      The aspect medial verbs retain, which is none in Nungon, in Manambu aspect only before the causal marker, which takes the tensed cross-referencing of a main verb, in Korean the perfect before the suffixes that admit it, and in Turkish the aspect markers before the converbs on a tensed stem.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The generalizations #

        Same-subject medial forms leave the subject unindexed and different-subject forms index it: Nungon's same-subject verb is the bare dependent stem with the medial suffix while its different-subject verb carries a subject desinence, and no Manambu same-subject marker follows subject cross-referencing while both different-subject markers do, so agreement on medial verbs is restricted in both.

        theorem SarvasyAikhenvald2025.relations_fused_with_sr :
        (∀ (m : Manambu.MedialMarker), m.sr ≠ none → m.relations.Nonempty) ∧ (∃ r ∈ Clause.Chaining.MedialForm.relationsMarked Manambu.MedialMarker, ¬r.Temporal) ∧ (∀ (m : Nungon.Medial), m.sr ≠ none → m.relations = ∅) ∧ ∃ (m : Nungon.Medial), m.sr = none ∧ m.relations.Nonempty

        Manambu's switch-reference markers each encode a temporal or logical relation, and some of the relations lie beyond the temporal ones; Nungon's switch-reference forms encode no relation, and completion before the next event is marked by the perfect, which is neutral to switch-reference.

        The chain's tense comes from the final verb in Nungon, whose medial verbs bear no tense, and Manambu's medial tense is relative; Korean admits tense before some but not all of its medial suffixes.

        Turkish negates medial clauses individually, since every converb admits the negative before it or is negative itself.

        The medial verbs of the languages without switch-reference are converbs, as their fragments record them.

        Switch-reference goes with the Papuan systems of the sample and its absence with the converbal ones, and the systems with switch-reference are the ones whose medial verbs lose tense or reduce it to relative tense.