Ronderos et al. (2024): Factors affecting contrastive inferences #
A listener who interprets the short pencil contrastively, as distinguishing the pencil from a longer one, identifies the referent before the noun when the display holds such a contrasting object. Ronderos and colleagues track this contrastive inference by eye-tracking with colour, scalar and material adjectives, in Sedivy's paradigm, and separate three accounts by their predictions across adjective types. On Sedivy's pragmatic account the interpretation is contrastive only for adjectives rarely used descriptively, so colour should show no contrast effect and material should. On the perceptual account the contrast must be perceived during preview, and material contrasts are less salient, so colour should show the effect and material should not. On the semantic account of Aparicio, Xiang and Kennedy a relative gradable adjective needs a comparison class from the display, which lowers the no-contrast baseline for scalar adjectives.
Main statements #
perceptual_matches: the perceptual account predicts the effects found.pragmatic_fails: the pragmatic account does not.baseline_higher_iff_not_relative: the baseline is higher exactly for the non-gradable adjective types.
Implementation notes #
- Kinds of object are named by a representative object. The perceptual factor attributes a property to a whole kind as soon as one member shows it, so that objects of a kind are never perceived as contrasting.
- Salience and informativity are the paper's premises per adjective type, with size contrasts taken as perceptible, as the replicated scalar effect requires.
- The findings are the statistics of the Results section, in
Data/Experiments/RonderosEtAl2024.json, pooled over English, Hindi and Hungarian, which the paper's models treat as a grouping unit only. An effect is significant when its printed p-value is below 0.05.
References #
The paradigm (Figure 1) #
The four objects of a display are the target, the object that in the contrast condition is of the target's kind and lacks the property, the competitor of another kind sharing it, and a distractor.
Instances For
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidableEqObject x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.instReprObject = { reprPrec := RonderosEtAl2024.instReprObject.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The descriptive interpretation of the adjective picks out the objects with the property.
Equations
- d.descriptive = d.has
Instances For
The contrastive interpretation picks out the objects with the property that an object of their kind lacks.
Equations
- d.contrastive = {o ∈ d.has | ∃ (o' : RonderosEtAl2024.Object), d.kind o' = d.kind o ∧ o' ∉ d.has}
Instances For
A property whose contrast is not perceived is taken in by attributing it to a whole kind as soon as one of its members shows it.
Equations
- d.blur = { kind := d.kind, has := {o : RonderosEtAl2024.Object | ∃ (o' : RonderosEtAl2024.Object), d.kind o' = d.kind o ∧ o' ∈ d.has} }
Instances For
A blurred display never shows a contrast within a kind.
An interpretation anticipates the noun when the definite description already refers under it, and to the target.
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.Anticipates S = ((Reference.iota fun (x : RonderosEtAl2024.Object) => x ∈ S) = some RonderosEtAl2024.Object.target)
Instances For
An interpretation anticipates the noun exactly when it is the target alone.
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidableAnticipates S = decidable_of_iff (S = {RonderosEtAl2024.Object.target}) ⋯
In the display of the contrast condition the contrasting object is of the target's kind and lacks the property, and the competitor has it.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
In the display of the no-contrast condition the contrasting object is replaced by a distractor of its own kind.
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.noContrastDisplay = { kind := fun (o : RonderosEtAl2024.Object) => o, has := {RonderosEtAl2024.Object.target, RonderosEtAl2024.Object.competitor} }
Instances For
The display of each condition.
Equations
Instances For
The contrastive interpretation of the contrast display singles out the target before the noun, since the competitor has the property but no object of its kind lacks it.
The descriptive interpretation leaves the target and the competitor.
Without a contrasting object the contrastive interpretation finds nothing.
The three factors #
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeSalient RonderosEtAl2024.AdjType.material = isFalse RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeSalient._proof_1
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeSalient RonderosEtAl2024.AdjType.color = isTrue trivial
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeSalient RonderosEtAl2024.AdjType.scalar = isTrue trivial
An adjective type is informative when it is rarely used descriptively, so that its use is expected to be informative. Colour adjectives are produced descriptively about half the time ([Sed04]), material and scalar ones rarely.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeInformative RonderosEtAl2024.AdjType.color = isFalse RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeInformative._proof_1
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeInformative RonderosEtAl2024.AdjType.scalar = isTrue trivial
- RonderosEtAl2024.instDecidablePredAdjTypeInformative RonderosEtAl2024.AdjType.material = isTrue trivial
Scalar adjectives are relative gradable, and colour and material adjectives are non-gradable ([Ken07b]).
Equations
Instances For
The accounts of the contrast effect #
On the perceptual account the adjective is always interpreted contrastively, but a contrast that is not salient is not perceived.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
An account predicts a contrast effect for an adjective type when the noun is anticipated in the contrast condition and not in the no-contrast one.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The pragmatic account predicts a contrast effect exactly for the informative types.
The perceptual account predicts a contrast effect exactly for the salient contrasts.
The findings #
A printed p-value is below 0.05 when it is an upper bound at most 0.05 or a value under it.
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.Bound.below.Significant x✝ = (x✝.toRat ≤ 5 / 100)
- RonderosEtAl2024.Bound.exact.Significant x✝ = (x✝.toRat < 5 / 100)
Instances For
The paper found a contrast effect for an adjective type when it reports a significant cluster of condition effects on target looks in the noun window and a significant effect of condition on the target-advantage score.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Whether looks to the target and the competitor in the no-contrast baseline were significantly higher for an adjective type than for scalar adjectives, the intercept of the model.
Equations
- RonderosEtAl2024.BaselineHigherThanScalar t = ∃ r ∈ RonderosEtAl2024.baselineLooks, r.adjType = t ∧ 0 < r.beta.toRat ∧ r.bound.Significant r.p
Instances For
The perceptual account predicts the effects found, for colour and scalar adjectives and not for material ones.
The pragmatic account predicts an effect for material and none for colour, the reverse of what was found.
The baseline follows the adjective classes. Looks to the property-matching objects exceed those for scalar adjectives exactly for the non-gradable types, which need no comparison class ([AXK15]).
Salience does not explain the baseline, since material adjectives, whose contrast is not salient, still draw more looks than scalar ones.