Pylkkänen (2008): Introducing Arguments #
Pylkkänen's inventory of argument-introducing heads underlies two typologies. Applicative heads are high or low: a high applicative relates the applied argument to the event and combines with the verb phrase by Event Identification, and a low applicative relates it to the verb's theme by a transfer of possession and takes the verb as its argument. Causative heads share one meaning, Cause, which relates a causing event to a caused one and introduces no individual; they vary in whether Cause is bundled with Voice and in whether it selects a root, a verb or a phase. The diagnostics that separate the heads, such as the restriction of low applicatives to structures with a direct object, are facts about semantic types, derived here by the type-driven composition engine.
Main definitions #
lowAppl: the low applicative.cause: Cause, the meaning shared by every causative head.CauseHead.Embeds: the layers a causative head's complement may contain.
Main results #
composes_unergative_iff: only high applicatives combine with unergatives.lowAppl_agent_eq_bot: a low applicative over an unergative makes the object agent and theme.cause_voice_order: Cause applies before Voice.hasCauseePosition_iff: a root-selecting, Voice-bundling causative leaves no causee position.
Implementation notes #
Semantic types are those of Montague.Ty, in which events share the type e with
individuals, as in the composition engine: the book's ⟨s,t⟩ is Ty.et and ⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩ is
Ty.eet. A constituent fails to compose with another exactly when tyBinary returns none.
The third applicative diagnostic, the availability of the applied argument for depictive
modification, is also a typing fact in the book: a depictive phrase is of type ⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩ and
combines by Predicate Modification with constituents of that type, which a high Appl' is and a
low Appl' is not. The engine's predicate modification is at ⟨e,t⟩ only, so that diagnostic is
recorded in the data rows only.
The Voice-bundling status of the Bemba, Luganda, and Venda causatives is unknown (Table 3.1,
note a), so only the English, Japanese, and Finnish heads are given as CauseHead values.
TODO #
The second applicative diagnostic (18), that low applicatives are nonsensical with completely
static verbs such as hold, is a fact about the plausibility of the transfer of possession
(15) asserts, not a typing fact: the low ApplP composes with a static transitive verb
(lowApplP_composes_transitive). Since the transfer relation of (15) is not relativized to the
event, the clash with a static event does not follow from the denotation; the study records the
book's correlation of the two tests across Table 2.1 (table21_static_iff_unergative).
References #
Applicatives: high relates to the event, low to the theme #
The low applicative (15) relates the direct object x to the indirect object y by the
transfer relation poss, to-the-possession for a recipient applicative and from-the-possession
for a source applicative, and asserts that x is the theme of the verb f.
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.lowAppl theme poss x y f e = (f x e ∧ theme x e ∧ poss x y)
Instances For
lowApplTy is the type of the low applicative head (15), ⟨e,⟨e,⟨⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩,⟨s,t⟩⟩⟩⟩.
Equations
Instances For
sisterTy a is the type of the applicative constituent that is the verb's sister, the high
applicative head (13) of type ⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩, which the verb phrase combines with by Event
Identification, or the low ApplP of type ⟨⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩,⟨s,t⟩⟩, which takes the verb as its
argument. The affected
applicative of [Cue03] is outside the book's inventory and has no type here.
Equations
Instances For
An applicative composes with an unergative verb phrase, of type ⟨s,t⟩, exactly when it is
high, Diagnostic 1 (17).
A low applicative cannot appear in a structure that lacks a direct object (17), since at no stage of its saturation does it compose with an unergative verb phrase, in either order.
The low ApplP composes with a transitive verb, static or not, so the second diagnostic (18) is not a typing fact.
In the derivation (16) of Mary bought John the book, the low ApplP takes the verb, whose denotation relates its theme to a buying event, and Voice adds the agent by Event Identification.
Over an unergative the constituent of type ⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩ is the Voice' whose open argument is
the agent, and the low ApplP composed with it holds of no event when no participant is both
agent and theme, the contradiction of (103b).
A Construction is one of the applicative constructions the book analyzes, with the head it
assigns
(Table 1.1, together with the Korean and Albanian applicatives of Chapter 2).
- chagaBenefactive : Construction
- lugandaBenefactive : Construction
- vendaBenefactive : Construction
- albanianBenefactive : Construction
- japaneseGaplessAdversity : Construction
- englishDOC : Construction
- japaneseDOC : Construction
- koreanDOC : Construction
- hebrewPossessorDative : Construction
- japaneseAdversityCausative : Construction
- japaneseGappedAdversity : Construction
Instances For
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instDecidableEqConstruction x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instReprConstruction = { reprPrec := Pylkkanen2008.instReprConstruction.repr }
c.head is the head the book assigns to the construction c.
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.chagaBenefactive.head = Minimalist.ApplType.high
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.lugandaBenefactive.head = Minimalist.ApplType.high
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.vendaBenefactive.head = Minimalist.ApplType.high
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.albanianBenefactive.head = Minimalist.ApplType.high
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.japaneseGaplessAdversity.head = Minimalist.ApplType.high
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.englishDOC.head = Minimalist.ApplType.low Minimalist.LowRelation.recipient
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.japaneseDOC.head = Minimalist.ApplType.low Minimalist.LowRelation.recipient
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.koreanDOC.head = Minimalist.ApplType.low Minimalist.LowRelation.recipient
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.hebrewPossessorDative.head = Minimalist.ApplType.low Minimalist.LowRelation.source
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.japaneseAdversityCausative.head = Minimalist.ApplType.low Minimalist.LowRelation.source
- Pylkkanen2008.Construction.japaneseGappedAdversity.head = Minimalist.ApplType.low Minimalist.LowRelation.source
Instances For
A construction composes with an unergative verb phrase when its head's applicative constituent does.
Equations
- c.ComposesUnergative = ∃ τ ∈ Pylkkanen2008.sisterTy c.head, (HeimKratzer.Tree.tyBinary τ Montague.Ty.et).isSome = true
Instances For
Table 2.1 lists each of the six languages with the construction tested, its unergative test, and its static-verb test.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
In Table 2.1, test 1, the applicative attaches to an unergative in exactly the languages whose head composes with one.
Across the six languages of Table 2.1 the static-verb test patterns with the unergative test, the correlation of §2.1.2.
The gapless Japanese adversity passive, a high applicative, composes with unergatives, while the gapped one, a low source applicative, does not (Table 2.5).
The transitivity restriction on Hebrew possessor datives (102), Table 2.2, follows from their low source analysis.
Cause introduces a causing event, not a causer #
Cause (9), the meaning shared by every causative head, relates the event it describes to a
caused event of which the predicate f holds, and introduces no individual.
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.cause CAUSE f e = ∃ (e' : E), f e' ∧ CAUSE e e'
Instances For
On the bieventive analysis (14) of John melted the ice, Voice relates John to an event that causes a melting, the reading (13b); on the θ-role analysis (16), a causer head relates John to the melting itself, the reading (15b).
Cause applied to a verb phrase yields a predicate of events, the unaccusative causative (18),
while the θ-role analysis's causer head (16a), of type ⟨e,⟨s,t⟩⟩, yields a relation that still
awaits an individual (§3.2).
The two heads of the Voice-bundling Cause (42) cannot combine with each other, in either order, so they apply to the verb phrase one at a time, and only Cause first, since after Voice nothing Cause can take remains (§3.3).
Selection: Cause takes a root, a verb, or a phase #
The layers of the Kratzer/Marantz verbal architecture (12) are the category-neutral root, the verb a category-defining head makes of it, and the phase closed by an external-argument introducer, Voice or a high applicative.
Instances For
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instDecidableEqLayer x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instReprLayer.repr Pylkkanen2008.Layer.root prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Pylkkanen2008.Layer.root")).group prec✝
- Pylkkanen2008.instReprLayer.repr Pylkkanen2008.Layer.verb prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Pylkkanen2008.Layer.verb")).group prec✝
- Pylkkanen2008.instReprLayer.repr Pylkkanen2008.Layer.phase prec✝ = Repr.addAppParen (Std.Format.nest (if prec✝ ≥ 1024 then 1 else 2) (Std.Format.text "Pylkkanen2008.Layer.phase")).group prec✝
Instances For
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instReprLayer = { reprPrec := Pylkkanen2008.instReprLayer.repr }
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instFintypeLayer = { elems := { val := ↑Pylkkanen2008.Layer.enumList, nodup := Pylkkanen2008.Layer.enumList_nodup }, complete := Pylkkanen2008.instFintypeLayer._proof_1 }
Layers are ordered by containment.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
A causative head is given by the largest layer its complement may contain (11) and whether Cause is bundled with Voice (10).
- selects : Layer
- bundled : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instReprCauseHead = { reprPrec := Pylkkanen2008.instReprCauseHead.repr }
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instDecidableEmbeds c l = { decide := l.rank.ble c.selects.rank, reflects_decide := ⋯ }
VP modifiers take scope below Cause, and verbal morphology intervenes between the root and Cause, exactly when Cause selects at least a verb (Table 3.2, rows 1 and 2). The two rows correlate because both are this one fact.
Agent-oriented modifiers take scope below Cause, and high applicative morphology intervenes between the root and Cause, exactly when Cause selects a phase (Table 3.2, rows 3 and 4).
A causee position (94) exists inside Cause's complement when that complement is at least a verb, or between Cause and Voice when Cause is not bundled with Voice.
Equations
- c.HasCauseePosition = (c.Embeds Pylkkanen2008.Layer.verb ∨ c.bundled = false)
Instances For
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.instDecidableHasCauseePosition c = { decide := decide (c.Embeds Pylkkanen2008.Layer.verb) || decide (c.bundled = false), reflects_decide := ⋯ }
Causatives of unergatives and transitives are impossible exactly for a root-selecting, Voice-bundling head (Table 3.1, second row).
The English zero-causative is root-selecting and Voice-bundling.
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.englishZero = { selects := Pylkkanen2008.Layer.root, bundled := true }
Instances For
The Japanese lexical causative is root-selecting, with Cause independent of Voice.
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.japaneseLexical = { selects := Pylkkanen2008.Layer.root, bundled := false }
Instances For
The Finnish -tta causative is verb-selecting, with Cause independent of Voice.
Equations
- Pylkkanen2008.finnishTta = { selects := Pylkkanen2008.Layer.verb, bundled := false }
Instances For
The English and Japanese root-selecting causatives differ on unergative bases, (95) and
(96), exactly as hasCauseePosition_iff predicts.