Documentation

Studies.Labov2006

Labov (2006): The Social Stratification of English in New York City #

Labov's survey of the Lower East Side measures phonological variables by social class, by contextual style from casual speech to minimal pairs, and by age. This file states what the book reads off its printed tables: the stratification of three department stores, the class and stylistic stratification of every variable except the lower class's (oh), and the fit of each variable's table of age by class to Labov's models of a stigmatized feature, stable or changing, and of an incoming prestige feature.

Main statements #

Implementation notes #

TODO #

References #

The scales #

@[instance_reducible]
Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
@[instance_reducible]
Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

The department store survey #

def Labov2006.anyR1 (s : Store) :
ℕ

anyR1 s is the percentage of the employees of s who used constricted [r] in all or some positions.

Equations
Instances For
    theorem Labov2006.anyR1_strictMono :
    StrictMono anyR1

    Constricted [r] rises with the prestige of the store.

    theorem Labov2006.fourthStops_strictAnti :
    StrictAnti fun (s : Store) => (fourthStops s).percent

    Stops in fourth fall with the prestige of the store.

    Class and stylistic stratification #

    v.styles is the set of styles in which v was measured.

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[instance_reducible]
      instance Labov2006.instDecidablePredStyleMemSetStyles (v : Variable) :
      DecidablePred fun (x : Style) => x ∈ v.styles
      Equations
      theorem Labov2006.mem_styles (s : Style) :
      s ∈ Variable.r.styles ∧ (s ∈ Variable.aeh.styles ↔ s ≤ Style.wordList) ∧ (s ∈ Variable.oh.styles ↔ s ≤ Style.wordList) ∧ (s ∈ Variable.th.styles ↔ s ≤ Style.reading) ∧ (s ∈ Variable.dh.styles ↔ s ≤ Style.reading)

      (r) was measured in all five styles, the vowels in all but minimal pairs, and the consonants in the three styles of connected speech.

      v.toStandard signs an index of v so that it grows toward the prestige form. The (r) index counts the constricted variant and the vowel indexes grow toward the corrected low vowels, while the (th) and (dh) indexes score the stop and the affricate above the fricative and are negated.

      Equations
      Instances For

        standardIndex v g s is the signed index of v for g in s, and 0 where nothing was measured.

        Equations
        Instances For

          v is class stratified in the style s when a higher class group is closer to the standard.

          Equations
          Instances For

            v is stylistically stratified in the class group g when a more formal style is closer to the standard.

            Equations
            Instances For

              A class group deviates from the class stratification of v when the groups are out of order in some style and the other groups are in order in every style.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                A class group deviates from the stylistic stratification of v when its index does not move toward the standard with formality.

                Equations
                Instances For
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  Equations
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  Equations
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  Equations
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  Equations

                  The class groups are differentiated on (r) in every style, and every group's (r) rises with formality, at all fifteen points of the table.

                  Every class group shifts (æh) with style, and the groups are differentiated except that the lower and working classes reach the same point in word lists.

                  (th) is stratified regularly by class and by style.

                  (dh) is stratified regularly by class and by style.

                  On (oh) the lower class deviates from class and from stylistic stratification, while the working and middle classes are stratified against each other and each shifts with style.

                  On the table, a class group deviates from class stratification exactly when it deviates from stylistic stratification, as Labov's hypothesis has it.

                  The lower class on (oh) is the only deviation in the table.

                  Apparent time #

                  def Labov2006.CaseIA {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) :

                  CaseIA f says that the use f of a feature by age and class is Labov's Case I-A, a stigmatized feature with no change in progress. The lowest-ranking class uses it most and the highest least at either age, and the middle-ranking classes use it less as they age.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    def Labov2006.CaseIB {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) :

                    CaseIB f says that f is Labov's Case I-B, a stigmatized feature with change in progress. The highest-ranking class uses it least at either age, and the middle-ranking classes use it more as they age.

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      def Labov2006.CaseIIB {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) :

                      CaseIIB f says that f is Labov's Case II-B, a prestige feature with change in progress. The highest-ranking class leads the younger speakers and uses it more when young than when old, and the middle-ranking classes acquire it as they age.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        def Labov2006.ReversesAtTop {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) :

                        ReversesAtTop f says that below the highest-ranking class the younger speakers use the feature more than the older, and that the highest class reverses this.

                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          theorem Labov2006.CaseIA.not_caseIB {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] {f : AgeGroup → κ → β} {c : κ} (hc : c ∈ Set.Ioo ⊥ ⊤) (h : CaseIA f) :
                          ¬CaseIB f

                          The two schemes for a stigmatized feature are opposite in the middle-ranking classes.

                          @[instance_reducible]
                          instance Labov2006.instDecidableCaseIA {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) [Fintype κ] [DecidableLT κ] [DecidableLE β] [DecidableLT β] :
                          Decidable (CaseIA f)
                          Equations
                          @[instance_reducible]
                          instance Labov2006.instDecidableCaseIB {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) [Fintype κ] [DecidableLT κ] [DecidableLE β] [DecidableLT β] :
                          Decidable (CaseIB f)
                          Equations
                          @[instance_reducible]
                          instance Labov2006.instDecidableCaseIIB {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) [Fintype κ] [DecidableLT κ] [DecidableLE β] [DecidableLT β] :
                          Decidable (CaseIIB f)
                          Equations
                          @[instance_reducible]
                          instance Labov2006.instDecidableReversesAtTop {κ : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [LinearOrder κ] [BoundedOrder κ] [Preorder β] (f : AgeGroup → κ → β) [Fintype κ] [DecidableLT κ] [DecidableLT β] :
                          Decidable (ReversesAtTop f)
                          Equations

                          /ʌy/ is distributed as a stigmatized feature in change.

                          (r) in casual speech is distributed as a prestige feature in change, in every detail.

                          The stratification of (r) sharpens, the upper middle class's lead in using any (r-1) in casual speech being wider among the younger speakers.

                          By social class, (æh) is distributed as a prestige feature in change, the corrected low vowel. Labov goes on to read it as change from below with a later correction from above, since the lower class also raises the vowel (aeh_lowerClass_monotone).

                          The lower class raises (æh) steadily, its index falling from the oldest level to the youngest.

                          theorem Labov2006.oh_no_case :
                          (¬CaseIA fun (a : AgeGroup) (c : SocialClass) => (ohByAgeAndClass a c).index) ∧ (¬CaseIB fun (a : AgeGroup) (c : SocialClass) => (ohByAgeAndClass a c).index) ∧ ¬CaseIIB fun (a : AgeGroup) (c : SocialClass) => (ohByAgeAndClass a c).index

                          By social class, (oh) shows none of the models' age contrasts.

                          In each ethnic group of the three lower social classes the oldest speakers have the lowest (oh) vowels, and the Italian index falls level by level toward the young.

                          (th), (dh) and casual (ing) share one pattern, in which the younger speakers of the three lower social classes use more of the stigmatized form and the upper middle class reverses this.

                          Pooling the three lower social classes reverses the age relation for (th) and (dh) but not for (r), whose classes below the upper middle already have the older speakers at or above the younger. The pooled (r) is by social class and the (r) table by socioeconomic class, a crossing the book makes.

                          The older members of the three lower social classes use less /in/ than the younger, in both styles.

                          (ing) in careful speech is distributed as a stable stigmatized feature.

                          (ing) in casual speech departs from a stable stigmatized feature only in that the older upper middle class does not use it least.