Docs / Studies / Studies.KitaharaSeely2026
Merge and the formal recognition of the workspace
Kitahara, H. & Seely, T. D. (2026). In The Cambridge Handbook of the Minimalist Program (pp. 286–297). Cambridge University Press
Source Bibliography
Chomsky reconceives Merge as an operation on the workspace (10): it targets two accessible terms
P and Q and adds {P, Q}. What else the output holds follows from two third-factor
principles, Preservation of Terms (11) and Minimal Yield (12), under which accessibility, the
members of the workspace and their terms, grows by exactly one. Keeping the Merge-ees as members
would raise it by more (18), so they leave the workspace (20); External and Internal Merge then
satisfy Minimal Yield (21)–(22), and Parallel and Sideward Merge, Late Merge and Countercyclic
Merge do not (23)–(25).
Marcolli, Chomsky and Berwick state Minimal Yield over a count of accessible terms, and its
condition on size is this one at the count of distinct terms (minimalYield_of_minimalist). Their
Sideward Merge of type 2(b) is MERGE leaving the extracted term's trace, an inaccessible leaf, and
satisfies their Minimal Yield; MERGE of the same targets leaving the term's copy keeps it
accessible where it was and violates Minimal Yield (sideward2b).
Implementation notes
- MERGE is
Workspace.merge, MERGE leaving copies, and Preservation of Terms
Workspace.terms_subset_terms_merge; MERGE leaving traces is Workspace.mergeWith. - The terms of an object are counted once each, so the lower copy of an internally merged term is
not counted again, minimal search finding the higher copy first; copies in different members of
the workspace are counted apart.
- The leaves
a to d stand for the chapter's schematic lexical items.
References