Documentation

Studies.Jardine2016a

Jardine (2016): Computationally, tone is different #

Jardine argues that unbounded circumambient processes, whose application depends on material unboundedly far away on both sides of the target, (2), are common in tonal phonology and rare in segmental phonology. His witness is unbounded tonal plateauing, every TBU between two H-toned TBUs surfacing H (Hyman and Katamba's rule, (7)), as the string map (36) of Section 4.1, which is Tone.utp. The map is subsequential in neither direction (Section 4.2) but regular: the mark-up decomposition (43), a left-to-right pass writing ? after an H and a right-to-left pass resolving it, is computed by a bimachine. Read back into autosegmental representations by (40), the OCP-merged output is one H linked to the plateau (Section 4.4).

Main results #

Implementation notes #

References #

The plateauing data #

The words of Section 2.2 carry their underlying and surface TBU strings in the paper's string representation of Section 4.1, one symbol per mora, H a TBU associated to a H tone and Ø, written O, an unspecified one, read off the paper's autosegmental diagrams.

def Jardine2016a.tbuString (s : String) :

tbuString s is the TBU string spelled s in H and O.

Equations
Instances For

    ofAnalysis a is the underlying and the surface TBU string of the word a analyses.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The map (36) reproduces every plateau of Section 2.2, Luganda (8) to (12), Zulu (18b) and Saramaccan (21), with no change for at most one H and a plateau between the outermost Hs otherwise.

      UTP is not subsequential #

      Whether a toneless TBU surfaces H depends on a H arbitrarily far away on each side of it, and the map preserves length, so a machine reading in either direction would have to withhold unboundedly many symbols.

      UTP is subsequential in neither direction (§4.2, online appendix).

      The (43) mark-up decomposition #

      With one extra symbol the two-pass decomposition exists: a left pass marks every toneless TBU after a H with ?; a right pass resolves ? by whether a H follows. The mark is exactly the alphabet enlargement that Heinz and Lai's weak determinism disallows.

      The mark-up alphabet of (43) adds Q, the paper's ?.

      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations
        def Jardine2016a.instReprMark.repr :
        Mark → ℕ → Std.Format
        Equations
        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          Equations

          The left pass of (43) marks every toneless TBU after a H with ?.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            The right pass of (43), run right-to-left, resolves ? to H when a H follows, else to Ø.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              theorem Jardine2016a.markLeft_run_getElem?_H_iff {w : List Tone.TBU} {j : ℕ} :
              (markLeft.run w)[j]? = some Mark.H ↔ w[j]? = some Tone.TBU.H

              The left pass writes H exactly where the input has H.

              The (43) decomposition computes UTP, marking left-to-right and then resolving right-to-left. Both passes run finite Mealy machines, so this exhibits UTP as a right-subsequential map after a left-subsequential one (Mealy.isLeftSubsequential, Mealy.isRightSubsequential).

              UTP is regular (§4.2). The (43) decomposition is a right-to-left Mealy pass after a left-to-right one, and a bimachine computes such a composite, one deterministic pass per direction. What fails above is one-directional determinism, not finite-state computability.

              The autosegmental reading (§4.4) #

              The string representation reads back into autosegmental representations by TBU.toAR ((40)); the OCP-merged representation of the output has one H, linked exactly to the plateau, Hyman and Katamba's rule as given in (7).