Documentation

Studies.HendersonCoon2018

Henderson and Coon (2018): Adverbs and variability in Kaqchikel Agent Focus #

Erlewine derives the Kaqchikel ban on extracting a transitive subject from anti-locality: the subject sits in Spec,IP, one step below Spec,CP, so an adverb adding a projection between them should make Agent Focus unnecessary. Henderson and Coon reply that a subject extracts with ergative agreement and no Agent Focus when its object is a reflexive, an extended reflexive, a clause or a light verb's complement, as accounts on which the object's Case traps the subject expect, and that the adverb effect is not one: the same adverb occurs with Agent Focus and without it, negation never removes it, and adverbs that cannot take a clause never do. A string without Agent Focus is biclausal, an adverb predicated of a clause whose subject is a resumptive pronoun, so nothing is extracted; an overt complementizer or pronoun forces that parse, and Agent Focus then appears only when the pronoun is focused inside the lower clause.

Main statements #

Implementation notes #

References #

Interveners #

The material between a preverbal phrase and the verb, the adverbs kan qitzij and kan 'truly', k'a ri 'then', jantäq 'sometimes' and jumul 'always', and negation man.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      An intervener can be a predicate taking a clause, as kan qitzij, kan and k'a ri can (§5.1) and jantäq, jumul (§5.3) and negation (§4) cannot.

      Equations
      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

        Examples and their parses #

        The objects of §3.2.

        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            What stands where an extracted subject would leave its trace, a gap, an overt resumptive pronoun, or one focused inside its clause.

            Instances For
              @[instance_reducible]
              Equations
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                An extraction example, with the argument that seems extracted, the form of the verb, the object, what intervenes, whether a complementizer is overt, what stands at the subject position, and the persons of the arguments.

                Instances For

                  The two structures a string may have (§5), one clause with its phrase extracted past the intervener, or an adverb predicated of a lower clause with a resumptive subject.

                  Instances For
                    @[instance_reducible]
                    Equations
                    @[instance_reducible]
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    def HendersonCoon2018.instReprParse.repr :
                    Parse → ℕ → Std.Format
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      A string parses as one clause unless an overt complementizer or resumptive pronoun marks a lower clause, and as two when the intervener takes a clause.

                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        @[instance_reducible]
                        Equations

                        The role extracted in a parse's clause, the phrase itself in one clause and, in the lower clause of two, only a focused resumptive pronoun.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The clause the case-based account judges for a parse: finite, Infl licensing the object, the Voice of the attested form and the object's Case needs.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Erlewine's input for the string as one clause, any intervener a projection above TP below the landing site.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Erlewine's grammar realizes the attested form in an optimal derivation.

                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                @[instance_reducible]
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                The examples #

                                The rows' labels for the interveners.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  The rows' labels for the objects.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    The example an extraction row describes.

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      An extraction row.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        Every example is grammatical exactly when one of its parses converges under the case-based account (§5): Agent Focus where a subject is extracted in its own clause, the transitive form where it is not, past an adverb taking a clause or a caseless object.

                                        Without the biclausal parse the case-based account fails exactly on the examples without Agent Focus whose subject seems to cross an adverb that takes a clause, the minimal pairs of §4; the examples with an overt complementizer or pronoun have no other parse.

                                        Erlewine's grammar fits an example read as one clause exactly when its object is a full DP and either nothing intervenes or a transitive verb follows an adverb that takes a clause. It misses the caseless objects of §3.2, Agent Focus past any adverb, negation, and the adverbs that take no clause (§4, §5.3), and since its outcome is fixed by the input it cannot give both forms past the same adverb, as (5) and (6) have.

                                        theorem HendersonCoon2018.embedding_rows (d : Datum) :
                                        d ∈ Examples.all → d.feature? "construction" = some "embedding" → ∃ i ∈ d.parse? "adverb" intervenerTable, d.judgment = Judgment.acceptable ↔ i.TakesClause

                                        The adverbs that take a clause in the embedding examples are those Intervener.TakesClause names (§5.1, §5.3).