Docs / Studies / Studies.ErlewineSommerlot2025

Voice and Extraction in Malayic

Erlewine, M. Y. & Sommerlot, C. J. (2025). Language, 101(4), 700–750

This file formalizes the account of voice and Ā-extraction in Malayic in Erlewine & Sommerlot 2025. The verbal domain has two heads, after Nomoto: v, which introduces the agent and licenses one nominal, and Voice, which heads a phase with exactly one nominal specifier. Every nominal is licensed by v or by T, so the nominal that v leaves unlicensed moves through Spec,VoiceP to the subject position. Each clause's Minimalist derivation is built from its parameters, and its VoiceP and CP Spell-outs, read off the derivation as Fox and Pesetsky's cyclic linearization reads them, are the paper's snapshots. Vocabulary items realize Voice and v by their adjacency at VoiceP Spell-out, a null Voice is pruned from the ordering statements, and a clause is grammatical when it is licensed, meets the EPP and the vocabulary, affixes an overt Voice to the verb, and linearizes.

The subject-only restriction on Ā-extraction follows, and so does its exception: a nominal other than the agent can be extracted while the agent raises or stays low only when Voice is null, since an overt Voice is ordered before the agent at VoiceP and after it at CP (57); the agent of a bare passive cannot be extracted across its theme (60); N- on v rather than Voice allows object extraction (§5.2); and the registers of Madurese differ in whether Voice has a null allomorph (§5.3). The six grammars predict the judgments of the paper's examples.

Implementation notes

  • A clause is its syntactic parameters, and the exponents of Voice and v are chosen after VoiceP Spell-out. Each phase, of Voice or C, is spelled out when the next head projects over it (Minimalist.Derivation.phaseSchedule). v+V is one terminal of category v, the paper not showing V-to-v movement, and one terminal stands for T with its auxiliaries.
  • The active v always projects its agent (30). The ban on an agent licensed by the passive v moving to Spec,VoiceP is the antilocality the paper tentatively suggests (§3.3).
  • Desa's T licenses a nominal in situ instead of attracting one under nominal Ā-extraction (§3.3). Kuching Malay's Voice is always null, and Jakarta Indonesian's di- passive is taken from Standard Indonesian (§5.2).
  • Ditransitive, possessor and embedded-argument extraction (§4.4), ellipsis (§4.5) and the Kendayan passives (§5.2) are not modelled.

References

Declarations

L96–104
L123–131

The derivation and its Spell-outs

Exponence

Grammars

L278–284
L286–296
L298–307
L378
L390–394

The rows

L418–419
L425–431

The ordering paradoxes

The predictions of §5

L518–524