Documentation

Studies.CitkoGracaninYuksek2025

Citko and Gračanin-Yuksek (2025): Economy in PF Reduction: Why and When (Not) to Elide Multidominant Structures #

Material can go unpronounced in two ways: shared between conjuncts (multidominance) or elided. Citko and Gračanin-Yuksek argue that economy chooses between them. Among the admissible derivations of a string with a given reading, the one spending the fewest lexical items, Merges and ellipses wins, and a derivation is admissible when none of its ellipses is vacuous (Pronunciation Economy) and no phase edge hosting several wh-phrases reaches PF in a language that bans multiple wh-fronting there. A coordinated wh-question (What and when should you teach?) therefore shares its heads but not its phrases, while a coordinated sluice (I forgot what and when) shares its whole C′ and elides it once, which hides the vP edge both wh-phrases crossed.

Main statements #

Implementation notes #

References #

The lexicon #

The null complementizer bearing [E], and a second one.

Equations
Instances For

    The tokens a second, separately built clause draws.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The candidates #

      clause builds [CP wh [C′ c [TP subj [T′ T [vP wh [v′ v VP]]]]]], the wh-phrase moved through the edge of vP.

      Equations
      Instances For

        In non-bulk sharing under the complementizers c₁ and c₂, each wh-phrase stays in its own conjunct and the subject, T, v and verb are shared ((10b), (14), (16b), (38d), (45c), (46b)).

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          In bulk sharing one C′ sits under both wh-phrases, both of which moved through its vP edge ((12b), (20b)).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Footnote 21's alternative to bulk shares a TP under two complementizers.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              The ellipsis analysis of the coordinated wh-question (11b) builds two clauses from separate tokens and elides the first under its [E] complementizer, with its auxiliary in T as the Sluicing-COMP generalization requires of a sluice.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                The double-ellipsis analysis of the coordinated sluice (19b), the authors' earlier one, builds two clauses from separate tokens and elides both; the second clause's object is a deleted copy of what, which vehicle change reads as it.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Its nonpaired counterpart (45b) leaves the second clause's verb without an object.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    In a multiple question both wh-phrases are fronted through the vP edge, as in (28b) and, under an [E] complementizer, the multiple sluice (29b).

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      @[reducible, inline]

                      The embedded coordinated wh-question (15a) with its null complementizer shared, and with two (15b).

                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        @[reducible, inline]

                        The coordinated sluice (20b), (26b), (38b).

                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          @[reducible, inline]

                          Its rival with two [E] complementizers over a shared TP (footnote 21).

                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            @[reducible, inline]

                            The coordinated sluice with the shape of the coordinated wh-question, one shared [E] complementizer over two TPs ((38d), (45c)).

                            Equations
                            Instances For
                              @[reducible, inline]

                              The nonpaired coordinated sluice (46b) has two complementizers, one bearing [E].

                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                @[reducible, inline]

                                Its rival in which both complementizers bear [E], set aside after (46b).

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Cost #

                                  A derivation's cost has three dimensions, the lexical items drawn, the Merges, and the applications of ellipsis.

                                  Instances For
                                    @[instance_reducible]
                                    Equations
                                    @[instance_reducible]
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    @[reducible, inline]

                                    The cost of a derivation is a count per dimension, ordered pointwise, so that one derivation is more economical than another when it spends no more on any dimension and less on one.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For
                                      @[instance_reducible]
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                      The cost of an object counts its tokens as the lexical items drawn, its internal terms as the Merges, a shared constituent being built once, and its elided domains as the applications of ellipsis. The terms are [MCB25]'s subtrees, each taken once.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        The multiple-wh-fronting parameter (27) #

                                        projection t finds the specifiers and head of the projection at the root of t. Going down the right spine, the specifiers are the left daughters above the head, which is the first selecting item met; the result is none when the spine ends first. This is the drawing convention headIndex? falls back on where the raising head is undefined, as it is wherever a phrase stands in a specifier.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          The token heading a constituent is its raising head, and for a deleted copy the token whose phrase it copies.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            A constituent is a wh-specifier when its head is a wh-token or its trace.

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              The heads of the projections whose edges host several wh-specifiers, each of which receives an asterisk.

                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                The categories of the asterisked projections whose heads reach PF unsilenced.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  t converges at PF in a language whose multiple-wh-fronting parameter is mwf, the categories whose asterisks PF cannot interpret, when no asterisk of those categories reaches PF.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For
                                                    @[instance_reducible]
                                                    Equations

                                                    In English variety A several wh-specifiers are banned at both phase edges.

                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      In English variety B they are banned at the vP edge only.

                                                      Equations
                                                      Instances For

                                                        German and Greek lack multiple wh-fronting (30) but have multiple sluicing (31).

                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Russian moves all its wh-phrases, where English moves one (after (29)).

                                                          Equations
                                                          Instances For

                                                            Romanian, where bulk sharing derives coordinated wh-questions (footnote 14).

                                                            Equations
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Optimality #

                                                              A derivation is admissible in a language when none of its ellipses is vacuous, Pronunciation Economy (39), and it converges at PF.

                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For
                                                                @[instance_reducible]
                                                                Equations
                                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                                                s competes with t when it yields the same string with the same reading.

                                                                Equations
                                                                Instances For
                                                                  @[instance_reducible]
                                                                  Equations
                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                                                  Economy makes t optimal among the candidates l in a language when it is admissible and no admissible competitor among them costs less.

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                  Instances For
                                                                    theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.optimal_iff {mwf : Finset Minimalist.Cat} {l : List Minimalist.PlanarSyntacticObject} {t : Minimalist.PlanarSyntacticObject} :
                                                                    Optimal mwf l t ↔ (t ∈ l ∧ Admissible mwf t) ∧ ∀ s ∈ l, Competes s t → Admissible mwf s → planarCost s ≤ planarCost t → planarCost t ≤ planarCost s
                                                                    @[instance_reducible]
                                                                    Equations
                                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                    theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.optimal_congr {mwf mwf' : Finset Minimalist.Cat} {l : List Minimalist.PlanarSyntacticObject} {t : Minimalist.PlanarSyntacticObject} (h : ∀ s ∈ l, pfAsterisks s = ∅) :
                                                                    Optimal mwf l t ↔ Optimal mwf' l t

                                                                    Among candidates none of whose asterisks reaches PF, optimality is the same in every language.

                                                                    Coordinated wh-questions (§3.1, §4.1) #

                                                                    theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.cwh_pf :
                                                                    Minimalist.pfPhon cwh = ["what", "when", "should", "you", "teach"]
                                                                    theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.cwhNullCSecond_pf :
                                                                    Minimalist.pfPhon cwhNullCSecond = ["what", "should", "when", "you", "teach"]

                                                                    A pronounced complementizer in the first conjunct only precedes the second wh-phrase (footnote 15).

                                                                    theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.cwhTwoAux_pf :
                                                                    Minimalist.pfPhon cwhTwoAux = ["what", "should", "when", "will", "you", "teach"]

                                                                    Each wh-phrase is interpreted in its own conjunct.

                                                                    The shared C′ carries a copy of each wh-phrase into the other conjunct.

                                                                    Bulk sharing is cheaper than non-bulk sharing.

                                                                    Of the three phase edges of the bulk-sharing object, the two CP edges host one wh-phrase each and the shared vP edge both, and its asterisk reaches PF ((37b)).

                                                                    So bulk sharing crashes wherever the vP edge counts.

                                                                    Non-bulk sharing leaves one wh-phrase at each edge, so no asterisk arises.

                                                                    In both English varieties the coordinated wh-question has one optimal derivation, non-bulk sharing: the ellipsis analysis and the extra null complementizer cost more, and bulk sharing, though cheaper, crashes at the vP edge, so the paired reading is unavailable.

                                                                    In a language with multiple wh-fronting bulk sharing is optimal (footnote 14).

                                                                    Coordinated sluices (§3.2, §4.2, §6.1) #

                                                                    The derivations of what and when the paper compares, paired and nonpaired.

                                                                    Equations
                                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                    Instances For

                                                                      The paired candidates are bulk sharing, its shared-TP rival and the double ellipsis.

                                                                      The shared vP edge hosts two wh-specifiers, the asterisk of (26b).

                                                                      Elided, it never reaches PF, and neither does any other candidate's asterisk.

                                                                      With one shared [E] complementizer over two TPs, the second deletion silences nothing new, the authors' earlier argument (CitkoGracaninYuksek2020.csFromCWH_vacuous).

                                                                      Two [E] complementizers are excluded twice over, since they elide the shared material twice and sharing the complementizer would be cheaper.

                                                                      In every language the coordinated sluice has two optimal derivations. For the paired reading, the elided shared C′ is cheaper than eliding two clauses or sharing TP under two complementizers. For the nonpaired reading, two complementizers of which only one bears [E] are cheaper than eliding two clauses, while a shared [E] complementizer, which draws one token fewer, elides vacuously, as does a second [E].

                                                                      The authors' earlier double ellipsis is admissible in every language but not optimal, since bulk sharing yields the same string with the same reading more cheaply.

                                                                      The shared verb occurs in the second conjunct outside the elided TP and is silenced all the same, so the nonpaired sluice cannot surface as a coordinated wh-question (footnote 30).

                                                                      Multiple questions and multiple sluices (§3.2.2) #

                                                                      Both phase edges of a multiple question reach PF with two wh-specifiers ((28b)).

                                                                      Multiple sluicing elides the vP edge but not the CP edge ((29b)).

                                                                      A multiple question converges only where neither edge counts.

                                                                      Multiple sluicing converges exactly where the CP edge does not count.

                                                                      So a multiple question crashes in both English varieties and converges in Russian, and multiple sluicing converges in variety B, German and Greek but not in variety A.

                                                                      Right node raising (§6.2) #

                                                                      [TP subj [T′ T VP]].

                                                                      Equations
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        In example (53b), Belk, Neeleman and Philip's analysis of Larson's mixed pivot, the pivot is multidominated and its first branch pruned, and then the first verb phrase, by then the bare verb, is pruned freely.

                                                                        Equations
                                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                        Instances For

                                                                          Example (54) builds the first verb phrase with its own pivot and elides it.

                                                                          Equations
                                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                          Instances For

                                                                            Example (55b) multidominates the verb phrase, the verbs matching.

                                                                            Equations
                                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                            Instances For

                                                                              The rival of (55b) with the shape of (53b), each conjunct with its own work.

                                                                              Equations
                                                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                              Instances For
                                                                                theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.rnrMixed_phon :
                                                                                rnrMixed.phon = ["Alice", "must", "Iris", "ought to be", "working", "on", "different", "topics"]

                                                                                With mismatched verbs, multidominating the pivot beats building it twice.

                                                                                theorem CitkoGracaninYuksek2025.rnrShared_phon :
                                                                                rnrShared.phon = ["Alice", "must", "Iris", "should", "work", "on", "different", "topics"]

                                                                                Belk, Neeleman and Philip license three derivations of (56), their (51), with the prosodic break before have, traveled or to. Multidominating the whole auxiliary phrase is cheaper than either derivation that elides, so economy blocks those (the paper's (57) and (58)) and leaves the break before have (59).