Documentation

Studies.BelkNeelemanPhilip2023

Belk, Neeleman and Philip (2023): What Divides, and What Unites, Right-Node Raising #

Right-node raising (John likes, and Mary dislikes, opera) shows properties of ellipsis, such as morphological mismatches and vehicle change, and properties of multidominance, such as cumulative agreement and internal readings of same. Belk, Neeleman and Philip argue that it comes from either source, and that one pruning rule at PF unites the two. The rule removes a branch of the first conjunct when a corresponding branch of the second can stand in for it without disturbing the first conjunct's word order. Applied to a branch pointing to multidominated material, pruning is forced, since the structure could not otherwise be linearized without crossing branches; applied to a branch with a counterpart of its own, it leaves an orphan that goes unrealized, which is ellipsis. Forced pruning comes first, so a constituent elided in the first conjunct can contain a multidominated pivot only at its right edge, and a finite pivot, which ellipsis cannot create, contains no further pivot.

Main statements #

Implementation notes #

References #

Pruning #

A derivation of right-node raising is a coordination, the first conjunct at [0] and the second at [1], with the branches it prunes, each paired with its proxy in the second conjunct: first the branches to multidominated material, then the free ones.

Instances For

    x precedes y in the linear order of a tree, lexicographically by address.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Where material of the first conjunct at x is realized once the branches P are pruned: inside a pruned branch, at the corresponding position under its proxy.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The pruning rule (86). After the prunings P, the branch at p may be pruned with proxy q when p lies inside the first conjunct and q inside the second, and the proxy's yield satisfies the ordering statements of p's yield in the first conjunct: pronounced material of the first conjunct that precedes p is realized before q, and material that follows p after it.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

          All prunings, the forced ones first.

          Equations
          Instances For

            A derivation is licensed when each pruning obeys (86) given the ones before it; when forced pruning removes branches to multidominated material, the same constituent as their proxies, and free pruning branches with a counterpart of their own and no finite head, since a finite pivot cannot be created through ellipsis (26); and when, as the No-Tangling Condition requires, no multidominated token keeps a branch in the first conjunct.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              @[instance_reducible]
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

              The realized tokens, left to right, are those outside every pruned branch.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The realized words, left to right.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  The first word of the first multidominated pivot, where a prosodic break falls.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Multidominance and ellipsis (§§1, 7) #

                    Opera, and a second token of it.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Multidominance (84) puts one opera under both verbs and prunes the first branch (85).

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Ellipsis (88) has an opera in each conjunct and prunes the first, leaving it unrealized.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          The gap in the second conjunct (89), by multidominance and by ellipsis.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.phon_rnrMD :
                              rnrMD.phon = ["John", "likes", "Mary", "dislikes", "opera"]

                              Both derivations of right-node raising are licensed.

                              theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.not_licensed_leftNode :
                              ¬leftNodeMD.Licensed ∧ ¬leftNodeE.Licensed ∧ ¬{ input := rnrMD.input, forced := [], free := [] }.Licensed

                              Neither derives a gap in the second conjunct (89), and multidominance without pruning tangles.

                              A book about opera, and a second token of it.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                [John [[bought x] for Mary]] and [Bill [wrapped y]] (91).

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For
                                  theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.not_licensed_gapBeforePP :
                                  ¬{ input := boughtWrapped ↑aBook ↑aBook', forced := [], free := [({ toList := [0, 1, 0, 1] }, { toList := [1, 1, 1] })] }.Licensed ∧ ¬{ input := boughtWrapped ↑aBook ↑aBook, forced := [({ toList := [0, 1, 0, 1] }, { toList := [1, 1, 1] })], free := [] }.Licensed

                                  Material of the first conjunct follows the gap (90), so neither pruning the first object (91a) nor the branch to a shared object (91b) is licensed.

                                  Excessively, and a second token of it, and a second John.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    [Mary [[flattered x] y]] and [Bill [[disparaged x'] y']] (92).

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Two pivots, by ellipsis (92a) or multidominance (92b), pruning the adverb's branch before the object's (93).

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For
                                          theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.licensed_twoPivots :
                                          twoPivotsE.phon = ["Mary", "flattered", "Bill", "disparaged", "John", "excessively"] ∧ twoPivotsMD.phon = twoPivotsE.phon ∧ twoPivotsE.Licensed ∧ twoPivotsMD.Licensed ∧ ¬{ input := twoPivotsE.input, forced := [], free := twoPivotsE.free.reverse }.Licensed

                                          Both derive Mary flattered, and Bill disparaged, John excessively; pruning the object first is not licensed, since the adverb would still follow it in the first conjunct.

                                          Ellipsis before multidominance (§5) #

                                          The objects of (58), Ava's supervisor and the same paper, and of (61), the same person and Ava's paper, each with a second token.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            [she [is going to [show [x y]]]] and [Ryo [will soon [show [x' y']]]] (58), (61).

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              In (58) the verb phrase is an elided pivot, the indirect object showing vehicle change, and the direct object at its right edge a multidominated pivot.

                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                In (61) the multidominated pivot, the indirect object, precedes the elided direct object.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For
                                                  theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.phon_pieBeforePim :
                                                  pieBeforePim.phon = ["she", "is going to", "Ryo", "will soon", "show", "Ava's supervisor", "the same paper"]

                                                  A multidominated pivot may stand at the right edge of an elided pivot (49), with the prosodic break before it.

                                                  theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.not_licensed_pimBeforePie :
                                                  ¬pimBeforePie.Licensed ∧ ¬MayPrune pimBeforePie.input [] { toList := [0, 1, 1, 1, 0] } { toList := [1, 1, 1, 1, 0] }

                                                  But not before material of the elided pivot, since forced pruning comes first, while the direct object still follows the indirect one in the first conjunct.

                                                  Finite and nonfinite pivots (§5) #

                                                  The perfect auxiliary have, and a second one.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For

                                                    The pivot to the same country, whose internal reading requires it to be multidominated.

                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      Example (51) with the auxiliary phrase multidominated, and no ellipsis.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        Example (51) with the verb phrase multidominated and the first auxiliary phrase elided.

                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Example (51) with only the prepositional phrase multidominated.

                                                          Equations
                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                          Instances For
                                                            theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.phon_derivations51 (d : Derivation) :
                                                            d ∈ derivations51 → d.phon = ["she", "will", "she", "could", "have", "traveled", "to", "the", "same", "country"]
                                                            theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.pivotOnset_nonfinite :
                                                            (∀ d ∈ derivations51, d.Licensed) ∧ List.map (fun (x : Derivation) => x.pivotOnset) derivations51 = [some "have", some "traveled", some "to"]

                                                            The nonfinite pivot of (51) has three licensed derivations, which put the prosodic break before have, traveled or to.

                                                            Example (52), its finite pivot multidominated.

                                                            Equations
                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Its rivals with the verb phrase or the prepositional phrase multidominated and the rest of the finite pivot elided.

                                                              Equations
                                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                              Instances For
                                                                Equations
                                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                Instances For

                                                                  The finite pivot of (52) is multidominated as a whole, so the prosodic break cannot shift rightward: its rivals would create a finite pivot through ellipsis (26).

                                                                  theorem BelkNeelemanPhilip2023.mayPrune_finiteRivals (d : Derivation) :
                                                                  d ∈ [finiteShareVP, finiteSharePP] → ∀ x ∈ d.prunings.zipIdx, MayPrune d.input (List.take x.2 d.prunings) x.1.1 x.1.2

                                                                  The rivals obey the pruning rule at every step; only (26) excludes them.