Beltrama, Solt and Burnett (2023): Context, Precision, and Social Perception: A Sociopragmatic Study #
Two experiments crossed three variants of a duration, approximate about fifty minutes, underspecified fifty minutes and precise forty-nine minutes, with four scenarios ranked by their need for precision, and had the speaker rated on scales that reduce to Status, Solidarity and anti-Solidarity. Precise speakers are rated above approximate ones on Status and anti-Solidarity and below them on Solidarity, and the underspecified variant patterns with the precise one on Status and with the approximate one on anti-Solidarity. The paper reads this in two ways (pp. 828–829): the underspecified variant is a neutral zero point, so that precision and approximation are separate indexical loci, or round numbers partake of both ends of a single opposition.
Main statements #
borneOut_contrastField,borneOut_neutral: both readings are borne out by the means of both experiments (p. 828), though on the opposition reading the precise and approximate variants are antipodal and each fits a single persona, while on the neutral reading they are separate loci (separateLoci_neutral) and each fits two personae.not_needHypothesis: no table of cell means that agrees with the cells Experiment 2 reports satisfies the hypothesis that raising the need for precision favors the more precise variant; the other reported interactions run as it predicts (favors_exp1,favors_exp2).loadsMostOn_exp1,loadsMostOn_exp2_iff: by maximal loading, the principal components recover the planned grouping of the scales in Experiment 1, and in Experiment 2 for every scale but friendly, which loads most on Status.
Implementation notes #
- Status, Solidarity and anti-Solidarity are read as the competence, warmth and anti-solidarity
of
SocialMeaning.Dimension. - The neutral reading takes the paper's verdict on each comparison with the underspecified variant, counting the trend of Experiment 1 on Status as a difference, as the paper does (p. 818); no p-value is thresholded.
- The underspecified variant is ranked between the others in precision, being compatible with a precise and an imprecise interpretation (p. 809).
- The context hypothesis is stated over full tables of cell means, which the paper only plots (Figures 2–4, 9–11); the theorems hold of every table agreeing with the printed cells.
References #
The variants #
The underspecified durations report the precise ones at the grain of ten minutes, each the multiple of ten closest to it (p. 807).
The numeral modifier an approximator is.
Equations
Instances For
Of a trip that takes the precise duration, the underspecified description is false read literally, on the two-sided and on the lower-bounded meaning of the bare numeral (p. 807).
The approximate description of the trip is true on every reading of its approximator that is not exact.
Two readings of the underspecified variant #
The dimension of social evaluation a composite score measures.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The mean composite scores of an experiment.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A sign field is borne out by an experiment when the means order every two variants that the field orders.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The precise and approximate variants are separate indexical loci when each indexes a dimension the other does not.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The underspecified variant is rated strictly between the precise and the approximate ones on every dimension in both experiments (p. 827).
On the opposition reading the variants are measured against the underspecified one, every difference of means counting.
Equations
Instances For
The precise and approximate variants are the two ends of a single opposition, since the underspecified variant lies between them.
Experiment 2 replicates the opposition of Experiment 1 (p. 825).
The direction of a verdict; a trend counts.
Equations
Instances For
On the neutral reading the underspecified variant is the zero point, and a variant indexes a dimension in the direction of its reported difference from it (p. 828).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Where the paper reports a difference, it runs in the direction of the means.
In both experiments the Status contrast is driven by approximation alone and the anti-Solidarity contrast by precision alone (p. 828).
Scenario modulation #
The favorable direction of a composite score; the anti-Solidarity scales measure low solidarity (p. 812).
Equations
Instances For
The need for precision of a scenario, highest for the record and lowest in Bonding (p. 811).
Equations
Instances For
The precision of a variant.
Equations
Instances For
A table of cell means agrees with the cells an experiment reports.
Equations
- BeltramaSoltBurnett2023.Agrees e T = ∀ r ∈ BeltramaSoltBurnett2023.scenarioRatings, r.experiment = e → T r.scenario r.variant r.factor = r.mean.toRat
Instances For
Scenario s favors variant v over variant w on a composite score more than scenario s'
does.
Equations
- BeltramaSoltBurnett2023.Favors T f s s' v w = (f.valence * (T s' v f - T s' w f) < f.valence * (T s v f - T s w f))
Instances For
In Experiment 2 the For-the-record scenario favors the precise variant over the underspecified one on Solidarity more than the Stranger scenario does, as the hypothesis predicts, but the Persuasive scenario favors it on Status more than For-the-record does (p. 823), against the hypothesis; the paper leaves this unexplained (p. 830).
The grouping of the scales #
A scale loads most on a principal component, the criterion by which the paper assigns a scale that loads on two (note 2).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
In Experiment 1 every scale loads most on the dimension it was included to measure.
In Experiment 2 every scale but friendly loads most on the dimension it was included to measure; friendly loads most on Status (Table 3).