[Zim08]: Quantification in Hausa #
Selected formalization from Zimmermann's handbook chapter in
[matthewson-2008], the first formal-semantic treatment of the
Hausa quantifier system whose textbook description is given in
[New00] and [Jag01]. The two reference grammars
fix the inventory typed in Hausa; this file
consumes those entries, states Zimmermann's predicted denotations, and
checks their consequences on a small concrete model.
Main declarations #
Hausa.UniversalQuantifier.z2008Denot— the predicted denotation each Hausa universal entry receives under Zimmermann 2008's GQ analysis, reframed via the [HHR+25] Q_∀ + ONE decomposition.Zimmermann2008.Faasinjee— a 3-passenger SG-count domain instantiating the kō-wh restrictor case ([Jag01] ex. faasinjojî-n p.376).Zimmermann2008.kowWh_buckled_false— kō-wh's singulative- distributive prediction on a model where one passenger falsifies the scope.Zimmermann2008.wani_ambiguity_witness— wani under VP-negation is ambiguous (Jaggar §9.5.3 p.374, Z2008 §3.2.4 ex. 69); on this model the ∃¬ reading is true while the ¬∃ reading is false.
Implementation notes #
z2008Denot extends the Fragment's UniversalQuantifier namespace
with Zimmermann 2008's analytical bridge to substrate denotations.
The denotation is paper-specific (Z2008 §3.2.5 leaves the choice open
between GQ, indeterminate-pronoun, and choice-function); housing it on
the Fragment type via the Studies file follows the project pattern of
paper-specific methods on consensus typological entries. The
denotation for kowWh is everyPresup (Q_∀ + ONE_∅); for duk it is
bare QForall on a CUM lattice, but no concrete CUM-lattice model is
exhibited here (see Todo).
References #
Todo #
- CUM-lattice concrete model for DUK (Jaggar §9.5.4).
- kō-wh under VP-negation yielding negative-existential readings (Jaggar §9.5.3 p.374): bàn gayà wà kōwā ba 'I told no one'.
- Free-choice kō-wh in modal/intensional contexts (Z2008 §3.2.3).
- The Chadic typology of class-B universals (Z2008 §3.4).
[Zim08]'s predicted denotation for each Hausa universal entry, reframed via the [HHR+25] Q_∀ + ONE decomposition. kō-wh receives Q_∀ + ONE_∅ (atom-by-atom distributivity, Jaggar §9.5.1); DUK receives bare Q_∀ on a CUM restrictor (collective single-set scope, Jaggar §9.5.4).
Equations
Instances For
A 3-passenger SG-count Hausa domain #
Three passengers (faasinjojî [Jag01] §9.5.4 p.376) — Audù, Bàlki, Càdi — board a plane; Audù and Bàlki buckle their seatbelts, Càdi does not. The minimal SG-count atomic domain on which UniversalQuantifier.kowWh's atom-by-atom predication and Indefinite.wani's scope ambiguity under negation are observable.
Equations
- Zimmermann2008.instDecidableEqFaasinjee x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Zimmermann2008.instReprFaasinjee = { reprPrec := Zimmermann2008.instReprFaasinjee.repr }
Flat order: every passenger is an atom; distinct passengers do not overlap.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The flat Faasinjee order is an IsAtomicDomain; its atom/disjoint facts now
derive from the shared Mereology machinery rather than bespoke proofs.
yā daurà wàndà 'buckled their seatbelt'.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- Zimmermann2008.instDecidablePredFaasinjeeDaura Zimmermann2008.Faasinjee.audu = isTrue trivial
- Zimmermann2008.instDecidablePredFaasinjeeDaura Zimmermann2008.Faasinjee.balki = isTrue trivial
- Zimmermann2008.instDecidablePredFaasinjeeDaura Zimmermann2008.Faasinjee.cadi = isFalse Zimmermann2008.instDecidablePredFaasinjeeDaura._proof_1
Mereological structure #
ONE_empty holds of the universal faasinjèe predicate. This is
the presupposition Z2008's kō-wh analysis (via Q_∀ + ONE_∅) places
on its SG-count restrictor.
UniversalQuantifier.kowWh distributivity (Jaggar §9.5.1, Z2008 §4.2.1) #
kōwānè faasinjèe yā daurà wàndà 'every passenger buckled their seatbelt' is false on this model: the kowWh-entry's denotation forces atom-by-atom predication (Jaggar p.370), and Càdi falsifies the scope.
Indefinite.wani scope ambiguity under negation #
(Jaggar §9.5.3, Z2008 §3.2.4 ex. 69)
The marked indefinite wani faasinjèe bài daurà wàndà ba 'wani passenger didn't buckle their seatbelt' is ambiguous between the ¬∃ reading ('no passenger buckled', preferred) and the ∃¬ reading ('some passenger didn't buckle'). On the 3-passenger model the readings have different truth values: the ∃¬ reading is true (Càdi witnesses), the ¬∃ reading is false (Audù and Bàlki did buckle). Both readings are linguistically available; their truth values diverge on this scenario.
The wide-scope (∃¬) reading: ∃x. Faasinjèe(x) ∧ ¬Daura(x). Witnessed by Càdi.
The narrow-scope (¬∃) reading: ¬∃x. Faasinjèe(x) ∧ Daura(x). False on this model — Audù witnesses the negated existential.
Indefinite.wani scope ambiguity, witnessed on a single model: the ∃¬ reading is true and the ¬∃ reading is false simultaneously. The empirical content of Z2008's ex. 69.