Storme (2026) [Sto26b] #
A method to evaluate systemic constraints in probabilistic grammars:
systemic constraints — *Homophony and others that score several
input–output mappings jointly — become compatible with probabilistic
grammars by evaluating a MaxEnt distribution over joint output tuples and
marginalizing to recover individual mapping probabilities. The case study is
variable hiatus in spoken Persian ([AJ21]): the suffix vowel
deletes freely in /hutʃɑ-emun/ (1PL possessive) but rarely in /hutʃɑ-e/
(definite), where deletion would leave the suffixed form homophonous with
the bare stem. This file builds the paradigm from two Hiatus.Junctures
over Persian segments — homophony is string identity, and the suffix-length
conditioning is string algebra (baseCollisions_eq) — and derives the
closed form of the marginalized model (persianMarginal_eq_softmax), its
fitted-weight preference orders (Table 5), and the suffix-length effect that
*Homophony creates (homophony_length_effect) and classical constraints
cannot (classical_no_length_effect).
Systemic Constraints #
A systemic constraint evaluates a whole output tuple — one output per
input — rather than an individual input→output pair, so it cannot be
decomposed into per-mapping evaluations (e.g. *HOMOPHONY counts colliding
output pairs). Like a Constraint, it is its violation-counting function;
its weight is supplied separately (the systemic twin of an HG weight).
Equations
- Storme2026.SystemicConstraint n O = ((Fin n → O) → ℕ)
Instances For
*HOMOPHONY: penalizes output tuples where distinct inputs receive the same
output, counting the colliding pairs |{(i, j) : i < j ∧ f i = f j}|.
Equations
- Storme2026.homophonyAvoidance f = {p : Fin n × Fin n | p.1 < p.2 ∧ f p.1 = f p.2}.card
Instances For
On a two-item paradigm, *HOMOPHONY is the collision indicator.
Joint Distribution with Systemic Constraints #
Systemic harmony of an output tuple: -∑ⱼ swⱼ · sconⱼ(f), the negated
weighted sum of the systemic constraints' tuple-violation counts. The
systemic twin of harmonyScore — same negated-weighted-sum shape, but
scoring whole tuples; it is the coupling component of the joint score.
Equations
- Storme2026.systemicScore sw scon f = -∑ j : Fin k, sw j * ↑(scon j f)
Instances For
Joint harmony score over the product space, combining classical per-mapping
scores with the systemic tuple-level score:
H_joint(f) = ∑ᵢ H(iᵢ, f i) + systemicScore sw scon f.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
MaxEnt grammar with systemic constraints as a CoupledSoftmax:
componentScore i v = harmonyScore classicalCon classicalW (inputs i, v) and
couplingScore f = systemicScore sw scon f. The joint probability is a
softmax over all Fin n → O output tuples; its marginal at position i
recovers the individual mapping probability under systemic pressure.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Marginal probability P(oᵢ ∣ iᵢ) = ∑_{f : f i = oᵢ} P_joint(f): marginalize
the joint distribution to recover a specific mapping's probability under
systemic pressure ([Sto26b]'s key equation). Defined through
CoupledSoftmax.marginal so that factorization follows from
marginal_eq_independent_when_uncoupled.
Equations
- Storme2026.marginalProb inputs classicalCon classicalW sw scon i o = (Storme2026.maxEntCoupled inputs classicalCon classicalW sw scon).marginal i o
Instances For
Factorization Theorem #
Factorization: when systemic weights are all zero, the marginal equals
the classical MaxEnt probability. The coupling score is then constant (= 0),
so marginal_eq_independent_when_uncoupled applies: the joint factorizes and
each marginal equals its independent per-item softmax.
The paradigm: two junctures, three candidate resolutions #
The three candidate resolutions [AJ21] consider for a suffixed input — the paper's restriction of the hiatus-resolution typology ([Cas11b]).
- hiatus : Resolution
Faithful vowel hiatus, e.g. [hutʃɑe].
- epenthesis : Resolution
Glottal-stop epenthesis, e.g. [hutʃɑʔe].
- deletion : Resolution
Suffix-vowel deletion, e.g. [hutʃɑ], [hutʃɑmun].
Instances For
Equations
- Storme2026.instDecidableEqResolution x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Storme2026.instFintypeResolution = { elems := { val := ↑Storme2026.Resolution.enumList, nodup := Storme2026.Resolution.enumList_nodup }, complete := Storme2026.instFintypeResolution._proof_1 }
Equations
Equations
- Storme2026.instReprResolution = { reprPrec := Storme2026.instReprResolution.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The definite-suffix juncture /hutʃɑ-e/: monosegmental suffix.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The possessive-suffix juncture /hutʃɑ-emun/: polysegmental suffix.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The bare stem [hutʃɑ].
Equations
Instances For
Each candidate as a Hiatus.Juncture repair: faithful hiatus,
glottal-stop epenthesis, V2 elision.
Equations
Instances For
[hutʃɑ]: deletion at the monosegmental juncture is the bare stem — the
concrete instance of Hiatus.Juncture.elideV2_eq_stem_iff.
[hutʃɑmun]: deletion at the polysegmental juncture keeps a residue distinct from the stem.
Constraints computed on strings, and the fitted weights #
*Hiatus: vowel–vowel adjacencies surviving in the surface form.
Equations
- Storme2026.starHiatus c = Phonology.Hiatus.count (Storme2026.resolve c.2 c.1)
Instances For
Dep: inserted segments — the surface form's length excess over the input. Length-based counting is exact for this candidate set, since every candidate differs from the input by pure insertion or pure deletion.
Equations
- Storme2026.depConstraint c = (Storme2026.resolve c.2 c.1).length - c.1.input.length
Instances For
Max: deleted segments — the input's length excess over the surface form.
Equations
- Storme2026.maxConstraint c = c.1.input.length - (Storme2026.resolve c.2 c.1).length
Instances For
Dep's string count reproduces its binary Table 4 column — for any juncture.
Max's string count reproduces its binary Table 4 column — for any juncture.
*Hiatus's string count reproduces its binary Table 4 column on the paradigm's junctures. Unlike Dep and Max this depends on their segmental content: hiatus must survive nowhere but the juncture itself.
The classical (per-mapping) constraint vector: Dep, *Hiatus, Max.
Equations
Instances For
Fitted weights (posterior means) from [Sto26b]'s Table 4: Dep = 2.47, *Hiatus = 1.89, Max = 1 (fixed rather than estimated).
Equations
- Storme2026.classicalW = ![2.47, 1.89, 1]
Instances For
Fitted weight (posterior mean) of *Homophony: 2.27.
Equations
- Storme2026.homophonyWeight = 2.27
Instances For
*Homophony over the paradigm: collisions among the surface forms of the
fixed base (the bare stem) and the two suffixed inputs, via the generic
homophonyAvoidance. Homophony is string identity — nothing is stipulated
about which outputs collide.
Equations
- Storme2026.starHomophony f = Storme2026.homophonyAvoidance (Matrix.vecCons Storme2026.stem fun (k : Fin 2) => Storme2026.resolve (f k) (Storme2026.inputs k))
Instances For
*Homophony decomposes over this paradigm #
Collisions between one realized output and its juncture's own bare stem.
Equations
- Storme2026.baseCollisions j o = Storme2026.homophonyAvoidance ![j.stem, Storme2026.resolve o j]
Instances For
Only deletion at a monosegmental juncture collides with the base — for
any juncture, by the string algebra (Hiatus.Juncture.elideV2_eq_stem_iff
and the length facts).
Suffixed outputs never collide with one another, so *Homophony reduces to the per-input base collisions. This is the formal content of [Sto26b]'s fn. 1: on these data, an analysis with a per-mapping constraint against null suffix realization — [AJ21]'s — coincides with the systemic one.
Marginalized mapping probabilities #
Marginal probability that input k is realized as o — [Sto26b]'s
key marginalization equation instantiated to the Persian paradigm.
Equations
Instances For
Per-input harmony with the base-collision penalty folded in.
Equations
Instances For
Closed form of the folded scores: each candidate's fitted cost, with the *Homophony penalty (2.27, on top of Max's 1) landing exactly on deletion at the monosegmental juncture.
The uncoupled equivalent of the Persian model: by starHomophony_eq_sum
the coupling folds into the per-input scores.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The joint score of the Persian model agrees with its uncoupled equivalent's on every output tuple.
Closed form for the marginals: the coupling decomposes across positions
(starHomophony_eq_sum), so the joint factorizes and each marginal is the
softmax of its folded score.
The marginals form a probability distribution over the three resolutions.
Predictions with the fitted weights #
Table 5's preference orders: hiatus .55 ≻ epenthesis .31 ≻ deletion .14 under the monosegmental suffix, deletion .61 ≻ hiatus .25 ≻ epenthesis .14 under the polysegmental one.
A marginal comparison reduces to comparing folded scores.
Monosegmental suffix: deletion — which would merge the suffixed form with the bare stem — is the least likely realization (.14).
Monosegmental suffix: faithful hiatus is the preferred realization (.55).
Polysegmental suffix: epenthesis is less likely than faithful hiatus (.14 vs .25).
Polysegmental suffix: deletion is the preferred realization (.61) — [hutʃɑmun] keeps the suffix recoverable, so *Homophony is silent.
The suffix-length effect #
The two junctures have identical classical constraint profiles: the classical grammar cannot see the suffix-length difference.
Without *Homophony the model cannot express a suffix-length effect: for any classical weights the two suffixes receive identical distributions. The qualitative core of [Sto26b]'s model comparison — the fit without *Homophony is worse because classical constraints cannot separate the suffixes at all.
With *Homophony at its fitted weight, deletion is strictly less probable for the monosegmental suffix (predicted frequency .14) than for the polysegmental one (.61): the suffix-length effect of [AJ21].