Documentation

Linglib.Studies.StankovaSimik2025

Negation in Czech polar questions (Staňková & Šimík 2025) #

This file formalizes [SS25]'s particle results: náhodou as an overt indicator of the covert FALSUM operator (§6.1 subexperiment) and copak as sensitive to contextual evidence (§6.2 subexperiment, exs. 19-20). The lexical entries live in Czech.Particles; the three-way system and its Table 1 diagnostics are [stankova-2026]'s and live in Stankova2026.

Main results #

References #

Classification #

Semantic classification of the Czech PQ particles ([SS25] §6 for náhodou/copak; [stankova-2026] §2.2 supplies the rest via Stankova2026.classification).

  • orderingSourceModifier : ParticleSemantics

    Modifies the ordering source of an epistemic modal (náhodou; both papers' hypothesis).

  • temporalEndpoint : ParticleSemantics

    Temporal-endpoint presupposition; with telic predicates needs propositional negation (ještě).

  • veridicalEmphasis : ParticleSemantics

    'Really'-type emphasis (fakt; semantics deferred by [stankova-2026], cf. VERUM).

  • npi : ParticleSemantics

    General NPI (vůbec).

  • evidentialConflict : ParticleSemantics

    Conflict between prior epistemic state and contextual evidence (copak; cross-Slavic RAZVE family).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      This paper's classification of its two tested particles.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The experimentally separated bias dimensions (§6) #

        Whether a particle requires evidential bias: some true for copak (§6.2), some false for the FALSUM-tied náhodou (§6.1, acceptable in any type of context), none where untested.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The §6.1 subexperiment: NCIs (inner negation) degrade náhodou PQs (main effect of INDEFINITE, z = −12.845, p < .001), so náhodou "could be used as an overt indicator of the covert FALSUM operator being present in the structure" — and FALSUM is context-insensitive.

          The §6.2 subexperiment: copak "strongly indicates a conflict between speaker's prior belief and the currently available evidence" (citing [Nek96]) — biased > neutral contexts, main effect of CONTEXT, z = 9.372, p < .001; licensed in positive and negative PQs alike (exs. 19a-b). Cross-Slavic kin: Polish czyby, Russian razve (p. 12).

          náhodou and copak express opposite bias dimensions: FALSUM-tied and context-insensitive vs evidential-bias-tied and context-sensitive ([SS25] §6, the two subexperiments).