Documentation

Linglib.Studies.SandeClemDabkowski2026

Sande, Clem & Dąbkowski 2026: discontinuous vowel harmony in Guébie #

[SCD26]: in Guébie particle-verb focus constructions, the fronted particle harmonizes in ATR with the clause-final verb across intervening harmony-eligible words (their (24)). The analysis: harmony is strictly local at vP Spell-out, and later A′-movement separates target from trigger — spelled-out material staying accessible to later syntax (§6.2, via [FP05]'s Cyclic Linearization). Everything below is derived from the two §4 parameters (Aux blocking V-to-T, remnant fronting) rather than stipulated; the empirical core is their (44): harmony iff V is spelled out inside vP.

Main definitions #

Main results #

Implementation notes #

Spell-out snapshots are List String labels, as in Studies/FoxPesetsky2005.lean. The paper deems the harmony implementation "not crucial" ([San19]'s (46)/(47) in [Han14]'s Agreement by Projection); harmonyTableau renders only the ranking. §5's rejected phonological approaches ([CS82a], [Gaf98], [RW04a]) are formalized in Studies/Sagey1986.lean, Studies/RoseWalker2004.lean, Studies/Hansson2010.lean. TODO: the Atchan parallel ((51), Katherine Russell p.c., [Rus23]) awaits movement diagnostics; the paper leaves it open and so do we.

The ATR feature ([SCD26] (1)) #

Guébie has a ten-vowel system, +ATR ə e i o u vs. −ATR a ɛ ɪ ɔ ʊ, harmonizing as a binary feature; affixes and particles agree with the verb root when both are inside the same Spell-out domain. Only the per-terminal binary value matters here.

@[reducible, inline]

The tongue-root feature value (Phonology.TongueRoot.ATR).

Equations
Instances For

    The particle's lexical default, surfacing when no harmony trigger is local ((13)). Defaults are lexical per particle ((12)); we model the /jɔkʊ/ type, derived from the fragment lexicon (Fragments/Guebie/ParticleVerbs.lean).

    Equations
    Instances For

      The §4 syntax: two parameters derive the four orders #

      The two parameters of [SCD26] §4's predicate-fronting analysis: an auxiliary in T blocks V-to-T ((32)/(34)), and the remnant VP (containing the particle) may front to Spec,CP ((33)/(34)).

      • hasAux : Bool
      • fronted : Bool
      Instances For
        def SandeClemDabkowski2026.instDecidableEqClauseConfig.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : ClauseConfig) :
        Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            V stays in v — hence inside the vP Spell-out — iff Aux occupies T (§4.1).

            Equations
            Instances For

              Overt terminals spelled out within vP ((45)/(48)): the particle, plus V iff it has not raised past v. The object has independently shifted out.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The surface clause, derived compositionally ((31)–(34)): fronted particle, subject, T-material, object, in-situ particle, clause-final verb.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  The two-phase Cyclic-Linearization derivation: vP Spell-out, then the full surface clause ([FP05]'s final Linearize). Previously-spelled-out terminals recur, so Order Preservation is what makes consistency contentful.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The four attested word orders as parameter settings ([SCD26] (44)).

                    • SVOPart : WordOrder

                      S V O Part: V moves to T; Part stays in vP, clause-final.

                    • SAuxOPartV : WordOrder

                      S Aux O Part V: Aux occupies T, V stays in v; V and Part both in vP.

                    • PartSVO : WordOrder

                      Part S V O: V moves to T; the remnant VP (just Part) fronts to Spec,CP.

                    • PartSAuxOV : WordOrder

                      Part S Aux O V: V stays in v; the remnant VP (just Part) fronts.

                    Instances For
                      @[instance_reducible]
                      Equations
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        The parameter settings behind the four orders ((31)–(34)).

                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.surfaceOrder_attested :
                          WordOrder.SVOPart.config.surfaceOrder = ["S", "V", "O", "Part"] WordOrder.SAuxOPartV.config.surfaceOrder = ["S", "Aux", "O", "Part", "V"] WordOrder.PartSVO.config.surfaceOrder = ["Part", "S", "V", "O"] WordOrder.PartSAuxOV.config.surfaceOrder = ["Part", "S", "Aux", "O", "V"]

                          The derived surface strings are the attested orders.

                          Consistency: every setting linearizes; non-edge fronting would not #

                          theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.all_clauses_consistent (aux fronted : Bool) :
                          Minimalist.Linearization.Consistent { hasAux := aux, fronted := fronted }.derivation

                          Every parameter setting linearizes consistently.

                          The §6.2 escape-hatch argument: the particle can front because it is "the leftmost overt element in the vP phase upon spell-out". A counterfactual vP spelling the particle out to the right of V could not front it without an ordering cycle.

                          The (44) correlation, derived #

                          Harmony applies iff the trigger V is spelled out within vP (§6.1).

                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.harmony_eq_hasAux (aux fronted : Bool) :
                            { hasAux := aux, fronted := fronted }.harmony = aux

                            The (44) correlation derived from the syntax: harmony iff Aux blocks V-to-T.

                            theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.harmony_independent_of_fronting (aux f₁ f₂ : Bool) :
                            { hasAux := aux, fronted := f₁ }.harmony = { hasAux := aux, fronted := f₂ }.harmony

                            Fronting is irrelevant to harmony — the discontinuity is purely a surface effect of later movement.

                            theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.discontinuous_harmony :
                            { hasAux := true, fronted := true }.harmony = true ¬(["Part", "V"] <:+: { hasAux := true, fronted := true }.surfaceOrder ["V", "Part"] <:+: { hasAux := true, fronted := true }.surfaceOrder)

                            Discontinuity as a theorem: in the fronted SAuxOV clause, particle and verb are not surface-adjacent in either order, yet harmony applies ((24)).

                            The particle's surface ATR: the verb root's value under harmony ((12)), its lexical default otherwise ((13)).

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              §6.1's mechanism: the (46)/(47) ranking derives the surface value #

                              The paper implements local harmony as [San19]'s constraints in [Han14]'s Agreement by Projection, ranked ATRHARM ≫ IDENT-IO(ATR) within the vP domain; the winner harmonizes exactly when a trigger is local.

                              An output candidate for the particle at vP Spell-out: lexical input value, domain-local trigger (the verb root, when V is in the domain), and output.

                              Instances For
                                def SandeClemDabkowski2026.instDecidableEqHarmonyCand.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : HarmonyCand) :
                                Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    (46) IDENT-IO(ATR): one violation if the output differs from the input.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      (47) ATRHARM: one violation if a domain-local trigger disagrees with the output.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        The domain-local trigger: the verb root's value when V is spelled out in vP.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          The vP-domain tableau: both output values, ranked ATRHARM ≫ IDENT-IO(ATR).

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For
                                            theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.optimal_eq_surfaceATR (aux fronted : Bool) (vRoot : ATR) :
                                            (harmonyTableau particleDefaultATR (vPTrigger { hasAux := aux, fronted := fronted } vRoot)).optimal = {{ lexical := particleDefaultATR, trigger := vPTrigger { hasAux := aux, fronted := fronted } vRoot, out := surfaceATR { hasAux := aux, fronted := fronted } vRoot }}

                                            §6.1's mechanism, closed: the unique OT winner under ATRHARM ≫ IDENT-IO(ATR) surfaces with exactly surfaceATR — harmonized when a trigger is local, faithful to the lexical default otherwise.

                                            Frozen ATR survives later movement (§6.1) #

                                            [FP05]'s Order Preservation shape applied to harmony outcomes: [SCD26] §6.1 — the particle "will retain this ATR value when it undergoes focus fronting". The record is append-only across cycles.

                                            @[reducible, inline]

                                            Per-cycle log of frozen ATR values (terminal, value); append-only.

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              Extend the log with one cycle's assignments.

                                              Equations
                                              Instances For
                                                theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.extendFrozenATR_preserves (existing new : FrozenATR) {e : String × ATR} (h : e existing) :
                                                e extendFrozenATR existing new

                                                Order-Preservation analogue: earlier freezings survive later cycles.

                                                def SandeClemDabkowski2026.frozenATR? (table : FrozenATR) (terminal : String) :
                                                Option ATR

                                                The most recently frozen value on terminal, if any.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  A later re-freeze overrides — the intended semantics, though [SCD26] posit no CP-cycle ATR re-write for the particle.

                                                  The vP-cycle freezing for PartSAuxOV: Part inherits the verb root's value (e.g. /ni/ 'see' +ATR yields the particle surface form [joku], (11)–(12)).

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For

                                                    The CP cycle issues no new ATR assignment for Part; the vP value persists — §6.1's "it will retain this ATR value when it undergoes focus fronting".

                                                    The PIC stance (§6.2) #

                                                    [SCD26] §6.2: spelled-out material stays accessible to later syntax; strict PIC₁/PIC₂ would block the remnant-VP movement. The Cyclic-Linearization-bounded regime is PICStrength.linearizationBound.

                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      Under the Guébie PIC mode every phase admits extraction; concrete crashes come from Consistent instead (nonedge_particle_fronting_crashes).

                                                      Predicate fronting is narrow-syntactic (§3) #

                                                      Three diagnostics: successive cyclicity ((25)–(26)), island sensitivity ((27)–(28)), and island creation ((29)–(30)). This registers Guébie beside [HG19]'s Russian as a positive instance of VerbDoublingIsSyntactic, against [Lan06]'s PF-driven Hebrew analysis (the reason the substrate predicate is per-construction, not universal — see HarizanovGribanova2019Amalgamation.lean). The witnesses are schematic: the fronted remnant is an evacuation trace plus the verb copy, per their (31).

                                                      The Guébie predicate-fronting witness: V evacuates, the remnant VP fronts to Spec,CP, and the trace is pronounced — verb doubling.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        On the carrier, Internal Merge leaves a trace at the deeper position ([MCB25] §1.4.3); surface doubling is the pronunciation of both positions.

                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Guébie registered as a positive instance of VerbDoublingIsSyntacticIn (§3's diagnostics; decidable from the derivation structure).

                                                          The §7 prediction and the Wolof parallel #

                                                          The analysis predicts that "the target and trigger of harmony must be local at some point in the derivation, namely at an instance of spell-out", with later movement of one of them deriving surface discontinuity (§7). Guébie instantiates it with the target (particle) moving; Wolof relative clauses ([Sy05], [Mar19]) with the trigger (head noun) moving out of the DP phase, past non-harmonizing stative-verb material ((49)–(50)).

                                                          def SandeClemDabkowski2026.HarmonyProfile (low surface : List String) (trigger target : String) :

                                                          The §7 prediction schema: trigger and target co-spelled-out at a low phase, and the two-phase derivation linearizes.

                                                          Equations
                                                          Instances For
                                                            @[instance_reducible]
                                                            instance SandeClemDabkowski2026.instDecidableHarmonyProfile (low surface : List String) (trigger target : String) :
                                                            Decidable (HarmonyProfile low surface trigger target)
                                                            Equations
                                                            theorem SandeClemDabkowski2026.guebie_profile :
                                                            HarmonyProfile { hasAux := true, fronted := true }.vPSpellOut { hasAux := true, fronted := true }.surfaceOrder "V" "Part"

                                                            Guébie's fronted SAuxOV clause instantiates the §7 profile: V and Part are co-spelled-out in vP, and the fronted surface linearizes consistently.

                                                            The Wolof shapes ([Sy05] (49)–(50)): a bare noun–demonstrative DP, or a relative clause with the head noun fronted past the stative verb.

                                                            • localDP : WolofShape

                                                              head dem ((49)): no relative clause.

                                                            • relClause : WolofShape

                                                              head rel stative dem ((50)): head noun A′-moved to the left edge.

                                                            Instances For
                                                              @[instance_reducible]
                                                              Equations
                                                              Equations
                                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                              Instances For

                                                                Head noun and demonstrative are spelled out together at the DP phase in both shapes — harmony's locality is phase-internal, not surface.

                                                                Equations
                                                                Instances For

                                                                  The surface strings of (49)–(50).

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  Instances For

                                                                    Both Wolof shapes instantiate the §7 profile — the same schema Guébie satisfies, with the trigger rather than the target moving.

                                                                    Wolof discontinuity: in the relative clause the head and demonstrative are not surface-adjacent, yet they were co-spelled-out at the DP phase.