Documentation

Linglib.Phonology.Harmony.TongueRoot

Tongue-root systems and the [ATR]-inventory correlation #

Casali's typology of tongue-root harmony systems ([Cas24], the inventory-structure chapter of [RvdH24a]; [Cas03], [Cas08]): systems with a tongue-root contrast in high vowels (/2IU/) are characteristically [+ATR]-dominant (69 of 72 surveyed), while systems contrasting tongue root only in non-high vowels (/1IU/) show [+ATR] inertness and [−ATR] dominance indicators. Whether the feature is binary [±ATR] or privative [ATR]/[RTR] is explicitly open in the source; the value type here is neutral between the two readings.

The correlation is a defeasible typological tendency, never a theorem: Casali's own chapter records /1IU/ exceptions (Legbo, Ikoma), a questionable /2IU/ exception (Kimatuumbi), and a dominance-reversal class (Kinande, Komo, Lango, Turkana, …) where [+ATR] dominance is overridden in identifiable contexts. Per-language rows live with fragments and studies, not here.

Main definitions #

The tongue-root feature value: [+ATR] or [−ATR]. Neutral between binary and privative readings ([Cas24]).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    def Phonology.TongueRoot.instReprATR.repr :
    ATRStd.Format
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[simp]

      Casali's inventory classification: where the tongue-root contrast lives. Only systems with a contrast at all are classified (five-vowel /i e a o u/ systems fall outside the typology, [Cas24] fn. 1).

      • twoIU : InventoryClass

        Contrast in high vowels (possibly elsewhere too): nine-vowel Akan/Maasai, seven-vowel Kinande, ten-vowel Guébie.

      • oneIU : InventoryClass

        Contrast only in non-high vowels: the common seven-vowel /i u e ɛ o ɔ a/ type (Yoruba, Wolof).

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          The five evidence types for a dominant [ATR] value ([Cas24] §15.2.1, following [Cas03]).

          • dominantAffix : DominanceIndicator

            Invariant dominant affixes spreading onto roots (Maasai /íé/).

          • crossWordSpreading : DominanceIndicator

            Spreading across word boundaries or between compound members.

          • coalescencePreservation : DominanceIndicator

            Systematic preservation of one value in vowel coalescence.

          • allophonicDominance : DominanceIndicator

            A phonemically unpaired vowel with a predictable harmonized allophone.

          • weakAssimilatory : DominanceIndicator

            Harmonizing affixes surfacing with one value where harmony is inapplicable.

          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              A language's tongue-root row: inventory class, control type (Phonology.Harmony.ControlType — cross-cutting the inventory classification: root-controlled Degema and Guébie vs dominant-recessive Maasai), and the observed dominant value with its evidence (none = symmetric/inert patterning).

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The dominant value the [ATR]-inventory correlation predicts from inventory structure ([Cas24]): /2IU/ systems tend to [+ATR] dominance, /1IU/ systems to [−ATR] dominance. A defeasible tendency — the chapter records the exceptions — so studies state per-language conformance inline (∀ v ∈ p.dominant, v = p.inventoryClass.predictedDominant), never as a universal theorem.

                    Equations
                    Instances For