Palmieri (2024): Lexical and Grammatical Reciprocity #
This file formalizes the second chapter of [palmieri-2024], on lexical reciprocity in Romance.
Against the language-level parameter of [siloni-2012], on which Romance forms its reciprocals
in the syntax, verbs fall into three classes by the entries they carry: reciprocal
intransitives with a lexical reciprocal entry only, plain transitives with a transitive entry
only, and verbs like 'hug' with both, whose reciprocal reading requires se in most
environments but emerges without it in language-specific ones, Brazilian Portuguese finite
clauses, analytic causatives everywhere, and Spanish and Catalan absolute participials
(VerbClass.formations, SeOmissible). The columns of Table 2.1 follow from the entries: a
class combines with se iff it has a transitive entry and expresses reciprocity by itself
iff it has a lexical one (table21, romance_not_monolithic). The readings follow too: with
se the transitive entry contributes the grammatical reciprocal and reflexive readings and
the lexical entry its pseudo-reciprocal reading, so a class-3 se-clause is three-ways
ambiguous, and without se only the lexical entry contributes, so the grammatical readings
disappear and the pseudo-reciprocal reading survives exactly for the classes with a lexical
entry (grammatical_needs_se, pseudo_without_se_iff). A Romance lexical reciprocal is a
verb with some construction in which a reciprocal interpretation emerges without se, the
chapter's definition (44), which is having a lexical entry, in every language
(lexicalReciprocalIn_iff). Grammatical reciprocity is plain in the sense of [winter-2018]
for any relation, x and y kissed each other being x kissed y and y kissed x (50)
(eachOther_plainReciprocity), whereas the collective predicate of a lexical entry is not so
constrained, 'divorce' and 'kiss' failing one direction each (53), (54). The reciprocal
'with'-construction tracks the lexical entry, the generalization of [kemmer-1993], including
non-symmetric members and the si-retaining Italian cases that refine the French-based
restriction of [siloni-2012] (withConstruction_iff_lexical).
Implementation notes #
The entries are primitive and the class tables derived. The per-language inventories of lexical reciprocals come from the Romance Fragments, and one theorem from the fourth chapter's Swahili data records that lexical reciprocity need not be derivational. The Swahili chapters and the questionnaires are not otherwise formalized.
References #
- [palmieri-2024]
- [siloni-2012]
- [winter-2018]
- [kemmer-1993]
The verb classes and their entries (Table 2.1) #
The three classes of Romance verbs: 'chat', with no transitive entry (31); 'describe', unambiguously transitive (32); and 'hug', transitive with a lexical reciprocal entry besides (34), (38), (40), (42).
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqVerbClass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The entries a class carries, the two-entry proposal: a lexical reciprocal entry, a transitive entry fed by the grammatical se strategy, or both.
Equations
Instances For
The first column of Table 2.1: a class combines with se iff it has a transitive entry.
Equations
Instances For
The second column of Table 2.1: a class expresses reciprocity by itself iff it has a lexical entry.
Equations
Instances For
Table 2.1 as printed: the intransitives express reciprocity by themselves and reject se, the plain transitives the reverse, and the third class both.
The divergence from [siloni-2012]: Italian carries lexical reciprocal entries, class 3 abbracciare 'hug' (40), though the language-level parameter classifies it as syntax-set.
The witness grounded in the Italian Fragment: abbracciare carries a lexical reciprocal entry alongside its homophonous transitive alternate.
The se-less environments (Table 2.2) #
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqLanguage x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The constructions in which a class-3 verb may express reciprocity without se (§3): finite clauses (34), analytic causatives (38), (40), and absolute participials (42).
- finiteClause : Environment
- analyticCausative : Environment
- absoluteParticipial : Environment
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqEnvironment x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Table 2.2: whether the language lets a class-3 verb receive a reciprocal interpretation without se in the environment.
Equations
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese Palmieri2024.Environment.absoluteParticipial = False
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese x✝ = True
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.italian Palmieri2024.Environment.analyticCausative = True
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.italian x✝ = False
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.spanish Palmieri2024.Environment.finiteClause = False
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.spanish x✝ = True
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.catalan Palmieri2024.Environment.finiteClause = False
- Palmieri2024.SeOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.catalan x✝ = True
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Analytic causatives are the pan-Romance diagnostic: every language omits se there.
Per-language inventories of lexical reciprocals, from the Fragments.
Equations
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese = BrazilianPortuguese.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.italian = Italian.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.spanish = Spanish.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.catalan = Catalan.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
Instances For
Readings with and without se (§4.3) #
The readings of a plural-subject clause: the pseudo-reciprocal reading of a lexical entry, a single collective event, and the grammatical reciprocal and reflexive readings of a transitive entry under se.
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqSeReading x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The readings an entry contributes under se: the lexical entry its pseudo-reciprocal reading, the transitive entry the two grammatical readings (55), (56a), (57a).
Equations
Instances For
The readings an entry contributes without se: only the lexical entry contributes (56b), (57b).
Equations
Instances For
The readings of a se-clause of the class, when the class combines with se at all.
Equations
- c.readingsWithSe = if c.CombinesWithSe then List.flatMap Palmieri2024.Formation.readingsWithSe c.formations else []
Instances For
The readings of a se-less clause of the class.
Equations
- c.readingsWithoutSe = List.flatMap Palmieri2024.Formation.readingsWithoutSe c.formations
Instances For
A class-3 se-clause is three-ways ambiguous (56a), (57a).
Without se no grammatical reading survives, for any class: the reflexive and the accumulated-events reciprocal readings need the grammatical strategy.
The pseudo-reciprocal reading survives without se exactly for the classes with a lexical entry.
Definition (44): a class is a lexical reciprocal in a language iff some construction of that language lets a reciprocal interpretation emerge without se.
Equations
Instances For
Lexical reciprocity in the sense of (44) is having a lexical entry, in every language.
Pseudo-reciprocity against plain reciprocity (§4.3) #
Grammatical reciprocity over a set of participants, each other: the relation holds between every two distinct members.
Equations
- Palmieri2024.eachOther R s = ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → R x y
Instances For
(50): grammatical reciprocity is plain in the sense of [winter-2018] for every relation, symmetric or not: x and y kissed each other iff x kissed y and y kissed x.
A lexical entry's collective predicate is not so constrained: for any relation some collective predicate fails plain reciprocity for it, the room in which 'divorce' fails the collective-to-unidirectional direction (53) and 'kiss' the converse (54).
The reciprocal 'with'-construction (§4.4) #
Whether the class allows the reciprocal 'with'-construction, the observation of §4.4: both classes with a lexical entry do, including non-symmetric members, consultarsi con, lasciarsi con (59), and the attested baciarsi con, abbracciarsi con (60), and the plain transitives do not, ringraziarsi con (61). Italian retains si in the construction, unlike French.
Equations
Instances For
The generalization of [kemmer-1993] over the class system: the 'with'-construction is available exactly where a lexical entry is.
Swahili (fourth chapter) #
Swahili lexical reciprocals may lack a binary base altogether: jibizana 'discuss' is in the reciprocal inventory but in no derivational pair, so lexical reciprocity is not always derivational, the Bantu analogue of the Romance intransitive class.