Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Palmieri2024

Palmieri (2024): Lexical and Grammatical Reciprocity #

[Pal24]

LOT Dissertation 670, Utrecht University. Chapter 2 (Romance) is formalized here; the Swahili chapters and the reflexivity/reciprocity questionnaires are Todos.

Romance is not monolithically syntactic about reciprocity, against the language-level lex-syn parameter of [Sil12] (Siloni2012.italian.formation = .syntactic): a class of verbs ('hug', 'kiss', 'meet', 'marry', …) has BOTH a transitive entry — whose reciprocal reading requires se, the grammatical strategy — and an intransitive lexical reciprocal entry that surfaces without se in language-specific environments (Table 2.2: BP finite clauses, analytic causatives in all four languages, Spanish/Catalan absolute participials). Definition (44): a Romance lexical reciprocal is a verb with some construction where a reciprocal interpretation emerges without se or any other reciprocity element.

The semantic diagnostic is pseudo-reciprocity (§4.3): grammatical reciprocity accumulates unidirectional events (their (50)), while lexical reciprocals denote a single collective event, subsuming [Win18]'s plain reciprocals (symmetric bases, 'meet') and non-plain ones — 'divorce' fails the collective-to-unidirectional direction (their (53)) and 'kiss' the converse (their (54)), matching Winter's Table 3 rows (divorce_agrees_with_winter, kiss_agrees_with_winter). Without se only the pseudo-reciprocal reading survives; se-clauses with lexical reciprocals are three-ways ambiguous (§4.3, p. 38). The reciprocal 'with'-construction tracks the lexical class (§4.4, after [Kem93]), including non-symmetric members ('confer', 'break up') and si-retaining Italian instances — refining [Sil12]'s French-based restriction.

Main declarations #

The three verb classes (Table 2.1) #

Table 2.1: the three classes of Romance verbs.

  • reciprocalIntransitive : VerbClass

    'chat' (It. chiacchierare): no transitive entry, cannot combine with se, invariably reciprocal by itself (their (31)).

  • plainTransitive : VerbClass

    'describe': unambiguously transitive; reciprocity only through the grammatical se strategy (their (32)).

  • reciprocalTransitive : VerbClass

    'hug': a transitive entry that combines with se, plus a lexical reciprocal entry that surfaces without se in the Table 2.2 environments (their (34), (38), (40), (42)).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      The formation loci a class realizes: the two-entry proposal (p. 30). Class 3 has both a lexical reciprocal entry and a transitive entry fed by the grammatical (se) strategy — [Sil12]'s formation contrast is verb-level in Romance, not language-level.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The recorded divergence from [Sil12]: Italian carries lexical reciprocal entries (class 3, e.g. abbracciare 'hug', (40)) even though the language-level lex-syn parameter classifies Italian as syntax-set. The newer work draws the comparison (chronological dependency).

        The se-less environments (Table 2.2) #

        The four Romance languages of chapter 2.

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          def Palmieri2024.instReprLanguage.repr :
          LanguageStd.Format
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            The syntactic environments where class-3 verbs may express reciprocity without se (§3).

            • finiteClause : Environment

              Finite clauses (their (34): BP Mary e Lisa abraçaram).

            • analyticCausative : Environment

              Analytic causatives (their (38b), (40): Sp. hice abrazar, It. ho fatto abbracciare).

            • absoluteParticipial : Environment

              Absolute constructions with participials (their (42b): Ca. abraçats en Teo i la Ana).

            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Every language has a diagnostic environment — lexical reciprocity is detectable in all four languages (the existence claim behind definition (44)); analytic causatives are the pan-Romance diagnostic.

                Readings and the se-less disambiguation (§4.3) #

                The readings available to a plural-subject clause (§4.3, p. 38): the lexical pseudo-reciprocal (single collective event), the grammatical plain reciprocal (accumulated unidirectional events, their (50)), and the grammatical reflexive.

                Instances For
                  @[implicit_reducible]
                  Equations
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Readings of a se-clause by verb class: class-3 se-clauses are three-ways ambiguous (their (56a)/(57a)); plain transitives lack the lexical reading (their (55)); class-1 verbs do not combine with se.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Readings without se (in a Table 2.2 environment): only the pseudo-reciprocal survives — the reflexive/reciprocal ambiguity disappears (p. 30; their (56b)/(57b): no reflexive reading without se).

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Pseudo-reciprocity and Winter's Table 3 (§4.3) #

                        Their (53) matches [Win18]'s divorce row: the collective form does not entail two unidirectional relations (a divorce can be initiated by one side) — Pr₂ fails.

                        Their (54) matches [Win18]'s kiss row: two unidirectional kisses do not make a mutual kiss — Pr₁ fails.

                        The reciprocal 'with'-construction (§4.4) #

                        Whether the class allows the reciprocal 'with'-construction: yes for both lexical classes — including non-symmetric members, contra the symmetric-only restriction (their (59): It. consultarsi con, lasciarsi con; attested baciarsi con, abbracciarsi con (60)) — and never for unambiguous transitives (their (61): *ringraziarsi con). NB the Italian construction retains si, unlike French (*s'est embrassé avec, [Sil12] via ex. 39 of that discussion) — the availability contrast is class-level, not language-level.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The [Kem93] generalization over the class system: the 'with'-construction is available exactly where a lexical entry is — derived by relating the two independent class tables.

                          The (43) verb list #

                          A lexical reciprocal meaning attested with a transitive alternate, with the languages attesting it (their (43)).

                          Instances For
                            def Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqLexicalReciprocal.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : LexicalReciprocal) :
                            Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                Their (43): lexical reciprocals with a transitive alternate across BP (b), Catalan (c), Italian (i), and Spanish (s).

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Every language's fragment attests lexical reciprocals — the Appendix A grounding of definition (44).

                                  The witness behind romance_not_monolithic, grounded in the Italian fragment: abbracciare 'hug' (their (40)) carries a lexical reciprocal entry alongside its homophonous transitive alternate.

                                  Swahili lexical reciprocals ([Pal24] ch. 4, Appendix C) may lack a binary base altogether: jibizana 'discuss' is in the reciprocal inventory but in no derivational pair — lexical reciprocity is not always derivational, the Bantu analogue of Romance class 1.