Palmieri (2024): Lexical and Grammatical Reciprocity #
LOT Dissertation 670, Utrecht University. Chapter 2 (Romance) is formalized here; the Swahili chapters and the reflexivity/reciprocity questionnaires are Todos.
Romance is not monolithically syntactic about reciprocity, against the
language-level lex-syn parameter of [Sil12]
(Siloni2012.italian.formation = .syntactic): a class of verbs ('hug',
'kiss', 'meet', 'marry', …) has BOTH a transitive entry — whose
reciprocal reading requires se, the grammatical strategy — and an
intransitive lexical reciprocal entry that surfaces without se in
language-specific environments (Table 2.2: BP finite clauses, analytic
causatives in all four languages, Spanish/Catalan absolute
participials). Definition (44): a Romance lexical reciprocal is a verb
with some construction where a reciprocal interpretation emerges without
se or any other reciprocity element.
The semantic diagnostic is pseudo-reciprocity (§4.3): grammatical
reciprocity accumulates unidirectional events (their (50)), while
lexical reciprocals denote a single collective event, subsuming
[Win18]'s plain reciprocals (symmetric bases, 'meet') and
non-plain ones — 'divorce' fails the collective-to-unidirectional
direction (their (53)) and 'kiss' the converse (their (54)), matching
Winter's Table 3 rows (divorce_agrees_with_winter,
kiss_agrees_with_winter). Without se only the pseudo-reciprocal
reading survives; se-clauses with lexical reciprocals are three-ways
ambiguous (§4.3, p. 38). The reciprocal 'with'-construction tracks the
lexical class (§4.4, after [Kem93]), including non-symmetric
members ('confer', 'break up') and si-retaining Italian instances —
refining [Sil12]'s French-based restriction.
Main declarations #
VerbClass— Table 2.1's three classes, withcombinesWithSe,reciprocityByItself, and the two-entryformations.Language,Environment,seOmissible— Table 2.2.SeReading+readingsWith/readingsWithoutSe— the §4.3 ambiguity and its se-less resolution.withConstruction_iff_lexical— the 'with'-construction tracks lexical formation across the class system.romance_not_monolithic— the recorded divergence from [Sil12].lexicalReciprocals— the (43) verb list across BP/Catalan/Italian/ Spanish.
The three verb classes (Table 2.1) #
Table 2.1: the three classes of Romance verbs.
- reciprocalIntransitive : VerbClass
'chat' (It. chiacchierare): no transitive entry, cannot combine with se, invariably reciprocal by itself (their (31)).
- plainTransitive : VerbClass
'describe': unambiguously transitive; reciprocity only through the grammatical se strategy (their (32)).
- reciprocalTransitive : VerbClass
'hug': a transitive entry that combines with se, plus a lexical reciprocal entry that surfaces without se in the Table 2.2 environments (their (34), (38), (40), (42)).
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqVerbClass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instReprVerbClass = { reprPrec := Palmieri2024.instReprVerbClass.repr }
Whether the class combines with se (Table 2.1, column 1).
Equations
Instances For
Whether the class expresses reciprocity by itself (Table 2.1, column 2).
Equations
Instances For
The formation loci a class realizes: the two-entry proposal (p. 30). Class 3 has both a lexical reciprocal entry and a transitive entry fed by the grammatical (se) strategy — [Sil12]'s formation contrast is verb-level in Romance, not language-level.
Equations
Instances For
The recorded divergence from [Sil12]: Italian carries lexical reciprocal entries (class 3, e.g. abbracciare 'hug', (40)) even though the language-level lex-syn parameter classifies Italian as syntax-set. The newer work draws the comparison (chronological dependency).
The se-less environments (Table 2.2) #
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqLanguage x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instReprLanguage = { reprPrec := Palmieri2024.instReprLanguage.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The syntactic environments where class-3 verbs may express reciprocity without se (§3).
- finiteClause : Environment
Finite clauses (their (34): BP Mary e Lisa abraçaram).
- analyticCausative : Environment
Analytic causatives (their (38b), (40): Sp. hice abrazar, It. ho fatto abbracciare).
- absoluteParticipial : Environment
Absolute constructions with participials (their (42b): Ca. abraçats en Teo i la Ana).
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqEnvironment x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instReprEnvironment = { reprPrec := Palmieri2024.instReprEnvironment.repr }
Table 2.2: whether a class-3 verb can receive a reciprocal interpretation without se in a given environment.
Equations
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese Palmieri2024.Environment.finiteClause = true
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese Palmieri2024.Environment.analyticCausative = true
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese Palmieri2024.Environment.absoluteParticipial = false
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.italian Palmieri2024.Environment.analyticCausative = true
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.italian x✝ = false
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.spanish Palmieri2024.Environment.finiteClause = false
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.spanish x✝ = true
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.catalan Palmieri2024.Environment.finiteClause = false
- Palmieri2024.seOmissible Palmieri2024.Language.catalan x✝ = true
Instances For
Every language has a diagnostic environment — lexical reciprocity is detectable in all four languages (the existence claim behind definition (44)); analytic causatives are the pan-Romance diagnostic.
Readings and the se-less disambiguation (§4.3) #
The readings available to a plural-subject clause (§4.3, p. 38): the lexical pseudo-reciprocal (single collective event), the grammatical plain reciprocal (accumulated unidirectional events, their (50)), and the grammatical reflexive.
- lexicalPseudoReciprocal : SeReading
- grammaticalReciprocal : SeReading
- grammaticalReflexive : SeReading
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instDecidableEqSeReading x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Palmieri2024.instReprSeReading = { reprPrec := Palmieri2024.instReprSeReading.repr }
Readings of a se-clause by verb class: class-3 se-clauses are three-ways ambiguous (their (56a)/(57a)); plain transitives lack the lexical reading (their (55)); class-1 verbs do not combine with se.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Palmieri2024.readingsWithSe Palmieri2024.VerbClass.reciprocalIntransitive = []
- Palmieri2024.readingsWithSe Palmieri2024.VerbClass.plainTransitive = [Palmieri2024.SeReading.grammaticalReciprocal, Palmieri2024.SeReading.grammaticalReflexive]
Instances For
Readings without se (in a Table 2.2 environment): only the pseudo-reciprocal survives — the reflexive/reciprocal ambiguity disappears (p. 30; their (56b)/(57b): no reflexive reading without se).
Equations
Instances For
The se-less disambiguation: dropping se from a class-3 clause removes exactly the grammatical readings.
Pseudo-reciprocity and Winter's Table 3 (§4.3) #
Their (53) matches [Win18]'s divorce row: the collective form does not entail two unidirectional relations (a divorce can be initiated by one side) — Pr₂ fails.
Their (54) matches [Win18]'s kiss row: two unidirectional kisses do not make a mutual kiss — Pr₁ fails.
The reciprocal 'with'-construction (§4.4) #
Whether the class allows the reciprocal 'with'-construction: yes for both lexical classes — including non-symmetric members, contra the symmetric-only restriction (their (59): It. consultarsi con, lasciarsi con; attested baciarsi con, abbracciarsi con (60)) — and never for unambiguous transitives (their (61): *ringraziarsi con). NB the Italian construction retains si, unlike French (*s'est embrassé avec, [Sil12] via ex. 39 of that discussion) — the availability contrast is class-level, not language-level.
Equations
Instances For
The [Kem93] generalization over the class system: the 'with'-construction is available exactly where a lexical entry is — derived by relating the two independent class tables.
The (43) verb list #
A lexical reciprocal meaning attested with a transitive alternate, with the languages attesting it (their (43)).
- gloss : String
- languages : List Language
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Their (43): lexical reciprocals with a transitive alternate across BP (b), Catalan (c), Italian (i), and Spanish (s).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Per-language lexical-reciprocal inventories, from the Appendix A
fragment data (Fragments/Romance/{Lang}/Reciprocals.lean).
Equations
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.brazilianPortuguese = BrazilianPortuguese.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.italian = Italian.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.spanish = Spanish.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
- Palmieri2024.inventory Palmieri2024.Language.catalan = Catalan.Reciprocals.lexicalReciprocals
Instances For
Every language's fragment attests lexical reciprocals — the Appendix A grounding of definition (44).
The witness behind romance_not_monolithic, grounded in the
Italian fragment: abbracciare 'hug' (their (40)) carries a lexical
reciprocal entry alongside its homophonous transitive alternate.
Swahili lexical reciprocals ([Pal24] ch. 4, Appendix C) may lack a binary base altogether: jibizana 'discuss' is in the reciprocal inventory but in no derivational pair — lexical reciprocity is not always derivational, the Bantu analogue of Romance class 1.