Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Middleton2026

Middleton (2026) — Ordering of Impoverishment Rules in Taos and Basque #

[Mid26] [AN12] [HM93] [Har14a] [Har16a] [KK87] [Wat84] [HM26]

This file formalises the architectural argument of [Mid26]. Working within Distributed Morphology ([HM93]), [AN12] propose a strict modular postsyntax in which paradigmatic Impoverishment applies as a block before syntagmatic Impoverishment, and Metathesis follows all Impoverishment. Middleton shows from Taos verbal agreement that the second claim survives but the first does not (§§4.2.1–§4.2.5); the Basque half of the paper (§3.1) re-establishes the second claim — metathesis after impoverishment — using a different language and different rule shapes (whole-terminal deletion + adjacent-terminal swap).

Scope #

The full Taos paradigm involves dozens of Vocabulary Insertion rules and a large family of impoverishment / metathesis rules. We do not re-derive the entire paradigm. What lives here:

What is not modeled:

Metathesis Rule #

MetathesisRule parallels ImpoverishmentRule: keyed on a Neighborhood, carries a decidable condition. The structural change is to swap two distinguished feature types in the focus bundle — the rule names a pair of feature types and exchanges the positions of the first occurrences of each. The directionality matches [AN12]'s [[X] ⟩ ⟨ [Y]] / Z notation: "swap X and Y in environment Z."

Instances For

    Build a metathesis rule from a Boolean condition over the focus bundle (paradigmatic-style — the most common case in the Taos rules of [Mid26], where the condition refers only to the feature inventory of the same node being reordered).

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Index of the first feature in l whose type matches fv.

      Equations
      Instances For
        def Middleton2026.swapAt {α : Type u_1} (l : List α) (i j : ) :
        List α

        Swap the elements at positions i and j in a list. Out-of-bounds indices leave the list unchanged.

        Equations
        • Middleton2026.swapAt l i j = match l[i]?, l[j]? with | some xi, some xj => (l.set i xj).set j xi | x, x_1 => l
        Instances For

          Reorder the focus exponents by swapping the first occurrences of swapFst and swapSnd (their linear positions in the terminal's exponent string). Metathesis is inherently an operation on linear order, so it acts on the ordered toGramFeatures view.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Apply a metathesis rule at a neighborhood, returning the resulting bundle. When the condition holds, swap the positions of swapFst and swapSnd in the focus exponent string.

            NB: the canonical FeatureBundle is a total assignment keyed by feature dimension, hence order-insensitive; folding the swapped exponent list back via ofGramFeatures therefore launders the reordering away. The bundle-level result is thus a no-op whenever the swapped types differ, which is correct for the pipeline below (runStrict/runInterleaved only ever carry an empty metathesis chain). The empirically contentful, order-sensitive focus-level metathesis of [Mid26] is stated on the exponent-string view directly (derivIM/derivMI).

            Equations
            Instances For

              Apply a sequence of metathesis rules left-to-right. Each rule sees the focus as updated by prior rules; surrounding context is held fixed (one cycle of metathesis). Specializes runChain.

              Equations
              Instances For
                theorem Middleton2026.applyMetathesisChain_append (rs₁ rs₂ : List MetathesisRule) (n : Morphology.DM.Impoverishment.Neighborhood) :
                applyMetathesisChain (rs₁ ++ rs₂) n = applyMetathesisChain rs₂ { focus := applyMetathesisChain rs₁ n, leftCtx := n.leftCtx, rightCtx := n.rightCtx }

                applyMetathesisChain distributes over list concatenation.

                Strict vs Interleaved Postsyntactic Pipelines #

                Two architectures for the postsyntactic component:

                The two pipelines coincide on inputs whose impoverishment list is in para-then-syn order (runStrict_eq_interleaved_paraSyn). They diverge when a syntagmatic rule must precede a paradigmatic one ([Mid26] §4.2.1–§4.2.4) or when a paradigmatic rule must precede a syntagmatic one and one cannot guarantee the strict block ordering ([Mid26] §4.2.5).

                The Arregi & Nevins postsyntax (their Fig. 1, simplified to the two contested layers): paradigmatic Impoverishment, then syntagmatic Impoverishment, then Metathesis. Exponence Conversion and Morphological Concord are abstracted away — their internal ordering is not at issue in [Mid26].

                Instances For

                  A&N's strict pipeline: para-block, then syn-block, then metathesis.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Middleton's interleaved postsyntax: a single impoverishment list (whose entries may be paradigmatic or syntagmatic in any order), then metathesis.

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Promote a strict pipeline to an interleaved one in para-then-syn order. The two then compute the same output.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The strict pipeline is exactly the interleaved pipeline run on the paradigmatic-then-syntagmatic concatenation. Hence runStrict is strictly less expressive than runInterleaved: anything strict can derive, interleaved can derive too (with the same rules).

                          @[simp]

                          A two-rule strict pipeline (one paradigmatic, one syntagmatic, no metathesis) reduces to applying [p, s] in order.

                          @[simp]

                          An interleaved pipeline with no metathesis reduces to the impoverishment chain.

                          The structural inadequacy of runStrict. Whenever a paradigmatic rule p and a syntagmatic rule s produce different outputs depending on whether they fire in [s, p] or [p, s] order at some neighborhood n, the strict pipeline ⟨[p], [s], []⟩ is forced to yield the [p, s] answer — the [s, p] derivation is unreachable.

                          This is the formal counterpart of [Mid26]'s argument that A&N's modular ordering cannot derive Taos: the four cases in §4.2.1–§4.2.4 require precisely the syn-before-para derivation that runStrict excludes by construction.

                          The interleaved pipeline can deliver the syn-first derivation that runStrict cannot.

                          Inadequacy theorem. If [p, s] and [s, p] give different focuses at n, then the strict pipeline ⟨[p], [s], []⟩ cannot match the interleaved pipeline ⟨[s, p], []⟩ at n.

                          A two-step pipeline that runs impoverishment then metathesis at a neighborhood (the order both A&N and Middleton endorse).

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            The reversed two-step pipeline: metathesis first, then impoverishment (the order both A&N and Middleton reject — supported by Basque in §3.1 and by Taos in §3.2 of [Mid26]).

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Metathesis-after-impoverishment is non-trivial. If a single impoverishment rule r and a single metathesis rule m produce different focuses depending on order at n, then runImpovThenMeta and runMetaThenImpov differ — i.e., the architectural choice has empirical content.

                              Two Schematic Rules in Distinct Phases #

                              A paradigmatic rule: deletes [+atomic] whenever the focus contains both [+author] and [+minimal]. The condition refers only to the focus, so the rule is paradigmatic by construction (paradigmatic_isParadigmatic).

                              This is a minimal stand-in for the paradigmatic rules involved in [Mid26] §4.2.1–§4.2.4 — it is not a transcription of any specific paper rule.

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                A syntagmatic rule: deletes [+minimal] when the focus contains [+atomic] and there is at least one bundle of object-context to the right (the schematic [O 3i] condition, weakened to bare presence — sufficient for the bleeding/feeding interaction the paper diagnoses). The dependence on rightCtx is what makes the rule syntagmatic, and synMinimalRule_isSyntagmatic proves it.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  The two rules are genuinely in distinct phases: synMinimalRule actually depends on its right-context (it is not paradigmatic). Witness: two neighborhoods that share a focus but differ on rightCtx.

                                  A Real-Shaped Taos Witness #

                                  Witness focus: a 1s-style bundle [+author, +atomic, +minimal] (suppressing [+participant], which is irrelevant to either rule).

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Witness neighborhood: the 1s-style focus, with a real 3s bundle to the right standing in for the Taos object slot that conditions synMinimalRule.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      The Two Orderings Yield Different Outputs #

                                      Para-then-syn (= A&N): paraAtomicRule deletes [+atomic] first; synMinimalRule then can't fire (no [+atomic] left in focus). The [+minimal] survives.

                                      Syn-then-para (= Middleton): synMinimalRule fires first (focus has [+atomic], rightCtx non-empty), deleting [+minimal]; paraAtomicRule then can't fire (no [+minimal] left in focus). The [+atomic] survives instead.

                                      The two orders produce different feature bundles at this neighborhood.

                                      A&N's Strict Pipeline Cannot Reach the Syn-First Output #

                                      The schematic A&N postsyntax that contains exactly paraAtomicRule in the paradigmatic phase and synMinimalRule in the syntagmatic phase, with no metathesis.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        The schematic Middleton interleaved postsyntax, with the syntagmatic rule scheduled first — the order required by the §4.2.1–§4.2.4 Taos cases.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          Architectural inadequacy of runStrict for Taos. At the witness neighborhood, the strict A&N pipeline and Middleton's interleaved one return different feature bundles. Hence no ModularPostsyntax built from paraAtomicRule (paradigmatic) and synMinimalRule (syntagmatic) — and no extension that adds further rules to the same phases — can yield the syn-first output that Taos requires in [Mid26] §4.2.1–§4.2.4.

                                          Metathesis Still Follows Impoverishment (the Uphold) #

                                          A metathesis rule that swaps [+author] with [+atomic] when the focus contains all three of [+author], [+atomic], [+minimal]. Schematic of [Mid26]'s metathesis rules: a metathesis triggered in the presence of a particular number feature. The dependence on [+minimal] is what couples this rule to synMinimalRule (which deletes [+minimal]), so that the IM/MI orders diverge — the empirically motivated witness of "metathesis after impoverishment, not before."

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            Metathesis reorders the exponent string of a terminal; the canonical FeatureBundle (a dimension-keyed total assignment) is order-insensitive and cannot witness that reordering. The order-sensitive content of [Mid26]'s "metathesis must follow impoverishment" claim is therefore stated on the ordered exponent view List GramFeature. (The whole-terminal Basque half below, where order lives at the phrase level in List FeatureBundle, is unaffected and witnesses the same claim with a different rule shape.)

                                            Apply a metathesis rule to an ordered exponent string: when the rule's condition holds at the corresponding bundle, swap the first occurrences of swapFst and swapSnd in the list; otherwise leave it unchanged.

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Apply an impoverishment rule to an ordered exponent string in the witness context: when the rule fires, drop every exponent of the target's dimension, preserving the order of the survivors.

                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                Witness exponent string: [+author, +atomic, +minimal], the ordered view of witnessFocus.

                                                Equations
                                                Instances For

                                                  The two orders of impoverishment vs. metathesis genuinely diverge at the witness, witnessing the architectural fact that metathesis must follow impoverishment. In derivIM, synMinimalRule first deletes [+minimal], bleeding the metathesis condition, so the exponents stay in [+author, +atomic] order; in derivMI, metathesis fires first and swaps them to [+atomic, +author] before [+minimal] is deleted.

                                                  Postsyntax Feeds Vocabulary Insertion #

                                                  The post-postsyntactic focus bundle from A&N's strict pipeline at the witness — extracted as a top-level def so it is the input to Vocabulary Insertion below.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For

                                                    The post-postsyntactic focus bundle from Middleton's interleaved pipeline at the witness.

                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      A small schematic Vocabulary Item set keyed on FeatureVal. The Subset Principle ([HM93]) selects the longest matching entry. We use Morpheme.surface for the exponents to keep the connection to the Taos morpheme inventory in the Fragment.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        A&N's output feeds VI as [+author, +minimal]; the Subset Principle selects the [+author, +minimal] entry over the elsewhere ô. Surface form: n.

                                                        Middleton's output feeds VI as [+author, +atomic]; the Subset Principle selects the [+author, +atomic] entry. Surface form: o. The two architectures predict different surface forms at the same input — the empirical bite of the architectural divergence.

                                                        The architectural divergence shows up at the level of surface exponents, not just feature bundles: the same input neighborhood yields different morphemes under the two pipelines.

                                                        Basque — Whole-Terminal Postsyntax (Middleton §3.1) #

                                                        The Basque half of the paper operates on whole terminals, not features within a terminal. We lift the focus-level Neighborhood-based machinery of Impoverishment.lean / Metathesis.lean to phrase-level scans, then state Participant Dissimilation, Ergative Metathesis, and the Ondarru divergence witness.

                                                        Embick & Noyer 2001 call rules of TermMetaRule's shape "Local Dislocation". TermMetaRule is the FeatureBundle-typed instantiation with the applicator.

                                                        @[reducible, inline]

                                                        A Basque morphological phrase: a linear sequence of terminal FeatureBundles, head-leftmost in linear (post-linearisation) order.

                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For

                                                          A terminal-level Impoverishment rule: deletes a whole terminal when its Neighborhood (focus = the candidate terminal, leftCtx/rightCtx = its phrase-mates) satisfies condition. Parallel to the focus-level ImpoverishmentRule whose target is a feature within one terminal; here the target is the terminal itself. Motivating case: Basque Participant Dissimilation, [Mid26] (16).

                                                          Instances For

                                                            Apply a TermImpovRule, scanning the phrase left-to-right. The first terminal whose neighborhood satisfies the rule is dropped; if no terminal matches, the phrase is returned unchanged.

                                                            Equations
                                                            Instances For
                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For

                                                                A terminal-level Metathesis rule: swaps two adjacent terminals when the condition holds at their joint context. By convention t1 is the immediate left of t2. Motivating case: Basque Ergative Metathesis, [Mid26] (13).

                                                                Instances For
                                                                  @[implicit_reducible]
                                                                  instance Middleton2026.instDecidableCondition_2 (rule : TermMetaRule) (left : List Minimalist.FeatureBundle) (t1 t2 : Minimalist.FeatureBundle) (right : List Minimalist.FeatureBundle) :
                                                                  Decidable (rule.condition left t1 t2 right)
                                                                  Equations

                                                                  Apply a TermMetaRule, scanning the phrase left-to-right. Swap the first adjacent pair whose joint context satisfies the condition.

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  Instances For
                                                                    Equations
                                                                    Instances For

                                                                      Run impoverishment first, then metathesis — the endorsed pipeline of both [AN12] and [Mid26].

                                                                      Equations
                                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        Run metathesis first, then impoverishment — the order both authors reject; the Basque Ondarru *s-endu-s-n form [Mid26] (17b) is the diagnostic witness.

                                                                        Equations
                                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                        Instances For

                                                                          Participant Dissimilation ([Mid26] (16), [AN12] §4.6). Delete a 1p absolutive clitic ([CL +participant +author]) when there is a participant ergative clitic somewhere to the right in the same auxiliary. The rule operates at the terminal level — it deletes a whole bundle, not a feature within one.

                                                                          Equations
                                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                          Instances For

                                                                            Ergative Metathesis ([Mid26] (13), [AN12] §3.2). Swap T with an immediately following ergative clitic when T is leftmost in the auxiliary. The leftmost requirement (left.isEmpty) is what lets Participant Dissimilation feed Ergative Metathesis: only after PD deletes the absolutive clitic does T become leftmost.

                                                                            Equations
                                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                            Instances For

                                                                              The Ondarru witness phrase from [Mid26] (17a): s-endu-n [1pABS, T:past, 2sERG]. The complementizer is suppressed — it does not participate in either rule.

                                                                              Equations
                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                PD-then-Meta surface form (the grammatical s-endu-n order). PD deletes the absolutive 1p, leaving [T, ERG]; with T now leftmost, Ergative Metathesis swaps to [ERG, T] — the order that surfaces as s-endu-n.

                                                                                *Meta-then-PD surface form (the rejected 17b order). Ergative Metathesis cannot fire at the input — T is not leftmost (the absolutive clitic precedes it). PD then deletes the absolutive clitic, but it is too late to feed metathesis; the result is the T-leftmost order [T, ERG], the form [Mid26] marks ungrammatical (would require L-Support repair *d-endu-s-n).

                                                                                The two phrase-level pipelines diverge on the Ondarru witness. This is the Basque counterpart to arregiNevins_neq_middleton_at_witness; together they are the two empirical legs of [Mid26]'s claim that metathesis must follow impoverishment.