Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Taos.Agreement

Taos Verbal Agreement Fragment #

@cite{kontak-kunkel-1987} @cite{watkins-1984} @cite{harrington-1916} @cite{harbour-2014} @cite{harbour-2016} @cite{middleton-2026}

Taos (Kiowa-Tanoan, Northern Tiwa) verbal agreement prefixes index up to three arguments — agent (A), goal (G), object (O) — linearized in that order @cite{watkins-1984}. The prefix decomposes into person and number morphemes whose exponence and ordering are described by @cite{middleton-2026} (building on @cite{harbour-2003}, @cite{harbour-2008}, @cite{harbour-2011}, @cite{harbour-2014}).

This fragment provides only the morpheme inventory and a representation of agreement prefixes as FeatureBundle lists. The postsyntactic rules of impoverishment and metathesis that derive the surface forms — and the theorems about ordering — live in Phenomena/Allomorphy/Studies/Middleton2026.lean.

Person and Number Features (Harbour) #

Number features are [±atomic] and [±minimal] (@cite{harbour-2014}); person features are [±participant] and [±author] (@cite{harbour-2016}). Their denotations on Taos:

(Following @cite{middleton-2026} fn. 4, [−atomic] is used in place of A&N's [−singular] for direct compatibility with @cite{harbour-2014}.)

Argument position in a Taos verbal prefix. The linearization is A G O (agent, goal, object) per @cite{watkins-1984}.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[reducible, inline]

      A [±atomic] feature (@cite{harbour-2014}).

      Equations
      Instances For
        @[reducible, inline]

        A [±minimal] feature (@cite{harbour-2014}).

        Equations
        Instances For
          @[reducible, inline]

          A [±participant] feature (@cite{harbour-2016}).

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[reducible, inline]

            A [±author] feature (@cite{harbour-2016}).

            Equations
            Instances For

              An argument bundle = its person features then its number features, aligned per the Taos ordering convention [±part]:[±auth]:[±atom]:[±min] (@cite{middleton-2026} ex. 4 and 5).

              Equations
              Instances For

                The 1s:3i possessive prefix — the case in §4.2.5 where a paradigmatic rule must precede a syntagmatic one. Goal is 1s, object is 3i (3rd inverse). The agent slot is empty in possessive prefixes.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  The Taos morphemes named in @cite{middleton-2026}. We carry them as strings; vocabulary insertion is not modeled in this fragment (it would require a full DM exponent-competition model). The relevant facts are exponence rules (20–22), (31), (33), (34), (38), (42).

                  Instances For
                    @[implicit_reducible]
                    Equations
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For