Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Israel2001

[Isr01]: Minimizers, Maximizers, and the Rhetoric of Scalar Reasoning #

Israel's Scalar Model classifies polarity items by scalar value × rhetorical force (Figure 1) and explains the inverted items — maximizer NPIs (wild horses) and minimizer PPIs (for peanuts) — by propositional role (§4): facilitating roles produce inverted items, impeding roles canonical ones. The pecuniary paradox dissolves: a red cent (resource, impeding) and for peanuts (reward, facilitating) share a low monetary value but occupy different roles, hence opposite canonicity. The paper's items are ScalarItems (Semantics/Polarity/ScalarModel.lean); the classifications of the Fragments/English/PolarityItems.lean entries live here in classifiedLexicon, with the theory that consumes them.

Main results #

Canonical items (Figure 1) #

The basic Scalar Model predicts four cells:

EmphaticAttenuating
NPIlow: a wink, inchhigh: much, long
PPIhigh: tons, utterlylow: sorta, rather

Emphatic items license maximally informative interpretations, attenuating items minimally informative ones; NPI contexts are scale-reversing (DE), PPI contexts scale-preserving (UE).

a wink — canonical emphatic NPI (low, impeding): I didn't sleep a wink.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    insanely — canonical emphatic PPI (high): She is insanely good-looking.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      sorta — canonical attenuating PPI (low): She's sorta clever.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        all that — canonical attenuating NPI (high): He's not all that clever.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Inverted items (Figure 3) #

          Inverted items break the simple correlation between scalar value and polarity type; propositional role (§4) explains them.

          his own shadow — inverted emphatic PPI (low, facilitating): Godfrey is scared of his own shadow.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            with a feather — inverted emphatic PPI (low, facilitating): You could have knocked me over with a feather.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              The pecuniary paradox #

              Both a red cent and for peanuts denote small monetary values (§3, examples 15–16), but the first is an NPI and the second a PPI: they occupy different propositional roles — resource (what you spend, impeding) vs reward (what you gain, facilitating).

              a red cent — canonical NPI, resource role: He won't spend a red cent on your wedding.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                for peanuts — inverted PPI, reward role: He got Madonna to play for peanuts.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  The paradox dissolved: the same low value and emphatic direction, but different propositional roles and hence opposite canonicity.

                  The classified lexicon #

                  The paper's classifications of the Fragments/English/PolarityItems.lean entries (Figure 1 cells; §3 inverted items; §4 roles where the paper gives them).

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The proto-role bridge (§4, fn. 6) #

                    The suggestion of [Dow91] proto-role entailments for likelihood effect: Proto-Agent dominance suggests a facilitating role, Proto-Patient dominance an impeding one, and a tie suggests nothing — a heuristic, not a theorem: the pecuniary paradox shows propositional role can diverge from proto-role counts, which is why LikelihoodEffect is an independent concept rather than a function of theta labels.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Ambiguous superlatives (§6) #

                      Perception verbs allow dual scalar readings (Fauconnier 1975b): Eve didn't hear even the faintest noise ranks stimuli by likely existence, … even the loudest noise ranks experiencers by acuity. Perception is bicausal — it depends on the stimulus's salience and the perceiver's acuity — and the scale type fixes the role.

                      The two scales a negated perception superlative can invoke.

                      Instances For
                        @[instance_reducible]
                        Equations
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          The scale type fixes the propositional role: existential scales impede (if larger things exist, smaller ones do too), ability scales facilitate (missing the most perceptible means missing everything).

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Scale-reversing = DE, scale-preserving = UE #

                            §2 connects the Scalar Model to the Fauconnier–Ladusaw tradition: scale-reversing contexts are the downward-entailing ones, and scale-preserving contexts the upward-entailing ones, except that the relevant inferences may be pragmatic entailments within a scalar model rather than strictly logical — which is why the Scalar Model handles cases pure monotonicity misses.

                            Israel's scale directions: reversing (= DE, NPI-licensing) and preserving (= UE, PPI-licensing).

                            Instances For
                              @[instance_reducible]
                              Equations
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                Expected scale direction in licensing contexts, from the item's parameters: strength-licensed items need scale reversal (= DE), PPIs scale preservation (= UE), pure FCIs neither (non-veridicality).

                                Equations
                                Instances For