Angelopoulos 2026: On clausal complementation, once more #
[Ang26] derives the distribution of Greek oti- and
pu-clauses — near-complementary after verbs (ex. 1), free as internal
arguments and derived subjects yet banned as external arguments (§2.2),
stativity-restricted as pu-complements (§2.3) — from reversed
selection: oti and pu bear an uninterpretable [n]-feature checked
by a light noun in their specifier (partly adopting [Ars09])
that must incorporate into a lexical verbal head, licit only from
complement position (§3.1). The oti ~ pu split follows from the
content/situation dichotomy (§3.2, adopting [Bon22]) with
pu's factivity derived from situation-anchoring, the stativity
restriction from aspectual-head selection (§4.1), and §7.3
turns the §2 argumenthood diagnostics against Bondarenko's transparent
syntax–semantics mapping: bare oti-clauses sit in complement position
while composing via Predicate Modification (the explanans reading,
[Ell20a]). Typed paradigm sentences (ex. 1, 31–34) live
in Angelopoulos2026.Examples.
Reversed selection: the light noun (§3.1) #
The uninterpretable [n]-feature oti and pu bear, checked by merging a light noun in their specifier (§3.1: selection as feature checking).
Equations
Instances For
The light noun's [n]-feature, interpretable and valued on a nominal.
Equations
Instances For
The §3.1 lexical assignment: oti and pu carry the [n]-feature, an and na none.
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.nProbes c = if c = Greek.StandardModern.Complementizers.oti ∨ c = Greek.StandardModern.Complementizers.pu then [Angelopoulos2026.nProbe] else []
Instances For
oti and pu select a light noun in their specifier: their feature bundle carries the [n]-feature (§3.1).
Equations
Instances For
The merged noun's valued [n] checks the complementizer's under specifier–head matching.
The attested selection classes (§1–§2.3) #
Matrix verbs attested with oti only: saying, belief, knowledge (ex. 1a, 3–4, 21).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Matrix verbs attested with pu only: the emotive factives (ex. 1b, 13–14, 20).
Equations
Instances For
Verbs attested with both, as (eventive oti-sense, stative pu-sense) pairs (ex. 19, 22–23).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every sample verb's frames admit both oti and pu and already exclude na: coding and force underdetermine the split (§1).
Verb-level and C-level factivity are anti-aligned: the oti-selectors that presuppose their complement are exactly the knowledge verbs, no pu-only emotive factive presupposes, and only pu is lexically factive.
Incorporation licensing and the argument asymmetry (§3.1) #
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidableEqNounHost x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.instReprNounHost = { reprPrec := Angelopoulos2026.instReprNounHost.repr }
Only the lexical verbal head licenses light-noun incorporation ([HK93]); functional T and P do not.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidablePredNounHostLicenses Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.vLex = isTrue trivial
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidablePredNounHostLicenses Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.t = isFalse Angelopoulos2026.instDecidablePredNounHostLicenses._proof_1
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidablePredNounHostLicenses Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.p = isFalse Angelopoulos2026.instDecidablePredNounHostLicenses._proof_2
Positions a bare oti/pu-clause can occupy (§3.1 ex. 27–32).
- internalArgument : ClausePosition
- derivedSubject : ClausePosition
- externalArgument : ClausePosition
- pComplement : ClausePosition
Instances For
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidableEqClausePosition x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
The nearest potential incorporation host from each position.
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.ClausePosition.internalArgument.nearestHost = Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.vLex
- Angelopoulos2026.ClausePosition.derivedSubject.nearestHost = Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.vLex
- Angelopoulos2026.ClausePosition.externalArgument.nearestHost = Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.t
- Angelopoulos2026.ClausePosition.pComplement.nearestHost = Angelopoulos2026.NounHost.p
Instances For
A bare oti/pu-clause is licensed in a position iff its nearest host licenses light-noun incorporation (§3.1).
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.licensedIn pos = pos.nearestHost.licenses
Instances For
Bare clauses are licensed as internal arguments and derived subjects (§2.1–2.2).
Bare clauses are banned from external-argument position: T cannot host incorporation (§2.2).
Bare clauses are excluded after P (ex. 31c, 32c).
The licensing predictions match the ex. 31–32 judgments: acceptable as internal arguments, ungrammatical after P.
The stativity locus (§4.1) #
Aspectual heads introducing internal arguments (§4.1).
- vState : AspectualHead
- vEvent : AspectualHead
Instances For
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidableEqAspectualHead x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
vState selects both otiP and puP as its complement; vEvent selects only otiP (§4.1).
Equations
Instances For
A pu-complement forces the stative aspectual head (§2.3).
A verb whose aspectual head licenses a pu-complement is Vendler-stative (§2.3).
Every pu-only matrix verb's aspectual head is vState.
Each dual verb's pu-sense takes vState and its oti-sense
vEvent (ex. 19, 22–23).
Content vs situation (§3.2) #
The sort of clause each complementizer introduces — oti content, pu situation, na neither — which must match the incorporating noun's sort (§3.2).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A light noun of sort n can merge in the complementizer's
specifier iff its sort is the clause's sort (§3.2).
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.mergeableInSpec n c = (Angelopoulos2026.clauseSort c = some n)
Instances For
Only the content noun merges in Spec,otiP and only the situation noun in Spec,puP (§3.2).
The sort of the light noun a verb verbalizes under incorporation: stative senses, stative preferential attitudes, and occurrence verbs relate to situations; saying, belief, and knowledge to content (§3.2).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A verb verbalizes the light noun of sort n (§3.1–§3.2).
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.verbalizes v n = (Angelopoulos2026.nounSort v = some n)
Instances For
The near-complementary distribution through the light noun: each attested pairing has a noun the verb verbalizes that merges in the complementizer's specifier (§3.2).
simvéni 'happen' rejects oti by sort mismatch and pu by eventivity, leaving its subjunctive na-frame (fn. 14).
The situation-sorted complementizer is the lexically factive one (§3.2).
The sorts pass the §3.2 diagnostics: oti's is truth-evaluable ('true'/'mistaken'), pu's occurrence-compatible ('happen') (ex. 33–34).
The light-noun selectors are exactly the sort-bearing complementizers: the noun must match its clause's sort (§3.1–§3.2).
oti and pu are lexically distinct on this account (content vs situation) and on [Rou10]'s (indefinite vs definite), against fn. 17's allomorphy alternative.
Factivity from situation semantics (§3.2) #
A situation verb is anchored when it relates agents only to situation individuals realized at the evaluation situation.
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.Anchored verb = ∀ (a : X) (xs : SituationIndividual S) (s : S), verb a xs s → xs.sit s
Instances For
An anchored verb's pu-report entails its complement — the factive presupposition of pu-clauses derived from situation semantics (§3.2).
Content reports carry no such entailment.
ex. 1b's pu-report composed through existsClosure.
Against the transparent syntax–semantics mapping (§7.3) #
Syntactic position of an embedded clause: complement or adjunct (§7.3).
- complement : SynPosition
- adjunct : SynPosition
Instances For
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.instDecidableEqSynPosition x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The (position, composition-path) pairs attested for bare oti-clauses: Predicate Modification from either position, Functional Application from neither (§2, §7.3).
Equations
- Angelopoulos2026.bareOtiAttested Angelopoulos2026.SynPosition.complement Bondarenko2022.CompositionPath.viaSituation = True
- Angelopoulos2026.bareOtiAttested Angelopoulos2026.SynPosition.complement Bondarenko2022.CompositionPath.viaDPArgument = False
- Angelopoulos2026.bareOtiAttested Angelopoulos2026.SynPosition.adjunct Bondarenko2022.CompositionPath.viaSituation = True
- Angelopoulos2026.bareOtiAttested Angelopoulos2026.SynPosition.adjunct Bondarenko2022.CompositionPath.viaDPArgument = False
Instances For
Bare clauses never compose via FA from either position: FA requires the nominalizing D (§7.3 ex. 57).
Greek bare oti-clauses fill the cell [Bon22]'s transparent mapping predicts empty: syntactic argumenthood without Functional Application (§7.3).