Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Angelopoulos2026

Angelopoulos 2026: On clausal complementation, once more #

[Ang26] derives the distribution of Greek oti- and pu-clauses — near-complementary after verbs (ex. 1), free as internal arguments and derived subjects yet banned as external arguments (§2.2), stativity-restricted as pu-complements (§2.3) — from reversed selection: oti and pu bear an uninterpretable [n]-feature checked by a light noun in their specifier (partly adopting [Ars09]) that must incorporate into a lexical verbal head, licit only from complement position (§3.1). The oti ~ pu split follows from the content/situation dichotomy (§3.2, adopting [Bon22]) with pu's factivity derived from situation-anchoring, the stativity restriction from aspectual-head selection (§4.1), and §7.3 turns the §2 argumenthood diagnostics against Bondarenko's transparent syntax–semantics mapping: bare oti-clauses sit in complement position while composing via Predicate Modification (the explanans reading, [Ell20a]). Typed paradigm sentences (ex. 1, 31–34) live in Angelopoulos2026.Examples.

Reversed selection: the light noun (§3.1) #

The uninterpretable [n]-feature oti and pu bear, checked by merging a light noun in their specifier (§3.1: selection as feature checking).

Equations
Instances For

    The light noun's [n]-feature, interpretable and valued on a nominal.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The §3.1 lexical assignment: oti and pu carry the [n]-feature, an and na none.

      Equations
      Instances For

        oti and pu select a light noun in their specifier: their feature bundle carries the [n]-feature (§3.1).

        Equations
        Instances For

          The merged noun's valued [n] checks the complementizer's under specifier–head matching.

          The attested selection classes (§1–§2.3) #

          Matrix verbs attested with oti only: saying, belief, knowledge (ex. 1a, 3–4, 21).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Verbs attested with both, as (eventive oti-sense, stative pu-sense) pairs (ex. 19, 22–23).

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Every sample verb's frames admit both oti and pu and already exclude na: coding and force underdetermine the split (§1).

              Verb-level and C-level factivity are anti-aligned: the oti-selectors that presuppose their complement are exactly the knowledge verbs, no pu-only emotive factive presupposes, and only pu is lexically factive.

              Incorporation licensing and the argument asymmetry (§3.1) #

              Heads adjacent to a clause's light noun: a lexical verbal head, T, or P (§3.1).

              Instances For
                @[instance_reducible]
                Equations
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Only the lexical verbal head licenses light-noun incorporation ([HK93]); functional T and P do not.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Positions a bare oti/pu-clause can occupy (§3.1 ex. 27–32).

                    Instances For
                      @[instance_reducible]
                      Equations
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        A bare oti/pu-clause is licensed in a position iff its nearest host licenses light-noun incorporation (§3.1).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Bare clauses are licensed as internal arguments and derived subjects (§2.1–2.2).

                          Bare clauses are banned from external-argument position: T cannot host incorporation (§2.2).

                          Bare clauses are excluded after P (ex. 31c, 32c).

                          The stativity locus (§4.1) #

                          Aspectual heads introducing internal arguments (§4.1).

                          Instances For
                            @[instance_reducible]
                            Equations
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              The aspectual head determined by a verb's Vendler class: vState for stative classes, vEvent for dynamic ones (§4.1).

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                A pu-complement forces the stative aspectual head (§2.3).

                                A verb whose aspectual head licenses a pu-complement is Vendler-stative (§2.3).

                                Every pu-only matrix verb's aspectual head is vState.

                                Each dual verb's pu-sense takes vState and its oti-sense vEvent (ex. 19, 22–23).

                                Content vs situation (§3.2) #

                                The sort of clause each complementizer introduces — oti content, pu situation, na neither — which must match the incorporating noun's sort (§3.2).

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  A light noun of sort n can merge in the complementizer's specifier iff its sort is the clause's sort (§3.2).

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    The sort of the light noun a verb verbalizes under incorporation: stative senses, stative preferential attitudes, and occurrence verbs relate to situations; saying, belief, and knowledge to content (§3.2).

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      A verb verbalizes the light noun of sort n (§3.1–§3.2).

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        The near-complementary distribution through the light noun: each attested pairing has a noun the verb verbalizes that merges in the complementizer's specifier (§3.2).

                                        The situation-sorted complementizer is the lexically factive one (§3.2).

                                        The light-noun selectors are exactly the sort-bearing complementizers: the noun must match its clause's sort (§3.1–§3.2).

                                        Factivity from situation semantics (§3.2) #

                                        def Angelopoulos2026.Anchored {S : Type u_1} {X : Type u_2} (verb : SituationVerb S X) :

                                        A situation verb is anchored when it relates agents only to situation individuals realized at the evaluation situation.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For
                                          theorem Angelopoulos2026.pu_report_factive {S : Type u_1} {X : Type u_2} {verb : SituationVerb S X} (h : Anchored verb) (a : X) (q : SProp) (s : S) :
                                          Anchor.existsClosure verb a q sq s

                                          An anchored verb's pu-report entails its complement — the factive presupposition of pu-clauses derived from situation semantics (§3.2).

                                          theorem Angelopoulos2026.content_report_not_factive :
                                          ¬∀ (verb : ContentVerb Bool Unit) (a : Unit) (p : BoolProp) (w : Bool), Anchor.existsClosure verb a p wp w

                                          Content reports carry no such entailment.

                                          ex. 1b's pu-report composed through existsClosure.

                                          Against the transparent syntax–semantics mapping (§7.3) #

                                          Syntactic position of an embedded clause: complement or adjunct (§7.3).

                                          Instances For
                                            @[instance_reducible]
                                            Equations
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Bare clauses never compose via FA from either position: FA requires the nominalizing D (§7.3 ex. 57).

                                              Greek bare oti-clauses fill the cell [Bon22]'s transparent mapping predicts empty: syntactic argumenthood without Functional Application (§7.3).