Docs / Semantics / Degree / Antonymy

Antonymy

import Linglib.Semantics.Degree.Antonymy · namespace Degree

This file defines the vocabulary of an antonym pair of gradable adjectives, tall and short or happy and unhappy. Following Kennedy (2007) and Kennedy and McNally (2005), the two members measure the same degrees under inverse orderings, so an adjective's Polarity is which member it is, positive for the member measuring in the scale's increasing direction (tall) and negative for the inverted one (short). Inverting twice restores the ordering, so negative * p is the polarity of the antonym of a p adjective, and polarity acts on scale boundedness and on comparisons through the order dual. The positive forms of the members are contradictory (clean and dirty) or contrary (tall and short, which leave a gap), two cells of the Aristotelian square in the sense of Cruse and Horn; a lexical pair is contradictory when its poles take complementary standards, Degree.AntonymPair.ComplementaryStandards.

The contrary case is modelled by a Degree.ThresholdPair on a linearly ordered scale, the positive form true above its upper threshold and the negative form below its lower one, and Degree.AntonymForm is the quadruplet happy, not happy, unhappy, not unhappy that sentential negation generates from a pair, with a contradictory denotation on one threshold, where not unhappy collapses to happy, and a strengthened denotation on a pair, where the gap keeps them apart, as in Krifka's account. Evaluative valence, whether a predicate denotes a good or a bad property, is a second axis on which the poles differ, distinct from polarity.

Main definitions

Main results

References

Polarity

L70–76

Evaluative valence

The evaluative valence of a gradable predicate records whether it denotes a good, a bad or an evaluatively neutral property, which is distinct from scalar polarity (Nouwen 2024). Negative valence yields high-degree intensifiers and positive valence moderate-degree ones, which Nouwen explains by the Goldilocks effect, the negative evaluation of a scale's extremes.

inductive EvaluativeValenceL91–99

Derives Repr, DecidableEq.

Used by EvaluativeValence.flip

Used in Semantics/Attitudes/Basic, Semantics/Degree/Adjective, QingEtAl2025

The two-threshold model of a contrary pair

The two thresholds of a contrary antonym pair (happy and unhappy) are pos for the positive form, true above it, and neg for the negative form, true below it. That the lower threshold does not exceed the upper is a hypothesis where a gap is needed, not a stored invariant.

structure ThresholdPairL110–117
(D : Type u_1) :
Type u_1
  • pos : D
  • neg : D

Derives Repr, DecidableEq.

Used by ThresholdPair.gap, ThresholdPair.mem_gap, ThresholdPair.gap_nonempty_iff, AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotation, AntonymForm.decidableMemStrengthenedDenotation, AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotation_notNegative_diff_positive, AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotation_notPositive_diff_negative, AntonymForm.isContrary_strengthenedDenotation

Used in AlexandropoulouGotzner2024a, AlexandropoulouGotzner2024b, Beltrama2025

L126

The quadruplet

An antonym form is one of the four surface forms that sentential negation generates from an antonym pair, happy, not happy, unhappy and not unhappy. The type carries no semantics; a contradictory account collapses the four to two denotations and a contrary account keeps four, and each is a function on it.

inductive AntonymFormL135–144

Derives Repr, DecidableEq, Fintype.

Used by AntonymForm.flip, AntonymForm.flip_flip, AntonymForm.instMulActionPolarity, AntonymForm.negative_smul, AntonymForm.complexity, AntonymForm.contradictoryDenotation, AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotation, AntonymForm.decidableMemContradictoryDenotation, AntonymForm.decidableMemStrengthenedDenotation

Used in AlexandropoulouGotzner2024a, Krifka2007b

L148–154
L156
L158

The contradictory denotation of a form on a single threshold θ, which both poles share, so that the four forms collapse to two, happy and not unhappy above it, not happy and unhappy at or below it. This is the literal semantics Krifka 2007b attributes to a pair before pragmatic strengthening.

def AntonymForm.contradictoryDenotationL177–183
{D : Type u_1} [Preorder D] (θ : D) :
AntonymForm → Set D

Built from

Used by AntonymForm.decidableMemContradictoryDenotation, AntonymForm.contradictoryDenotation_synonymy, AntonymForm.contradictoryDenotation_notPositive, AntonymForm.isCompl_contradictoryDenotation

Used in Krifka2007b

The strengthened denotation of a form on a threshold pair, whose gap lifts not unhappy away from happy and not happy away from unhappy. This is the effective semantics after strengthening (Krifka 2007b) or the lexical one (Alexandropoulou & Gotzner 2024a).

def AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotationL185–192
{D : Type u_1} [Preorder D] (tp : ThresholdPair D) :
AntonymForm → Set D

Built from ,

Used by AntonymForm.decidableMemStrengthenedDenotation, AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotation_notNegative_diff_positive, AntonymForm.strengthenedDenotation_notPositive_diff_negative, AntonymForm.isContrary_strengthenedDenotation

Used in AlexandropoulouGotzner2024a, AlexandropoulouGotzner2024b

L196–199
L201–206