Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.ModalIndefinites.Studies.AlonsoOvalleRoyer2024

Modal Indefinites: Cross-Linguistic Typology & Event-Relative Anchoring #

@cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2024} @cite{alonso-ovalle-menendez-benito-2010} @cite{alonso-ovalle-menendez-benito-2018} @cite{coon-2019} @cite{hacquard-2006} @cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2021} @cite{chierchia-2013} @cite{jayez-tovena-2006} @cite{kratzer-shimoyama-2002}

Cross-linguistic typology of modal indefinites and bridge theorems connecting the event-relative modality theory (@cite{hacquard-2006}, formalized in Theories/Semantics/Modality/EventRelativity) to empirical observations.

Lexical entries are defined in Fragment files (single source of truth):

Architecture #

The key contribution of @cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2024} is DERIVING the position-sensitive flavor distribution of Chuj yalnhej from structural properties of event binding, rather than stipulating it lexically:

ChujArgPositionaccessibleBindersmiAnchorFlavorpredictedMIFlavors
  1. Syntactic position determines which EventBinders are accessible
  2. Each binder projects a specific MI flavor via AnchorType.toFlavor
  3. RC (random choice) additionally requires verb volitionality

Three Dimensions of Variation (§6) #

  1. Status: at-issue vs not-at-issue
  2. Content: which modal flavors
  3. Upper-boundedness: anti-singleton inference

Anchor Constraint (§4) #

At-issue modal indefinites are further distinguished by their AnchorConstraint: whether the anchoring function f has no definedness condition (unrestricted — defined for any event) or presupposes normative content (volitional-only). The anchor constraint controls where f CAN anchor; content licensing independently determines the resulting flavor.

Anchor Freedom (§4.1, footnote 17) #

A-O&R depart from @cite{hacquard-2006} in one key respect: the event argument of yalnhej's anchoring function can be "left free" — bound by the existential closure of the speech act event rather than by the closest event binder. In Hacquard's system, modals are always bound by the closest c-commanding event binder; yalnhej allows non-local binding, which is how external arguments (above AspP) still access the speech event despite intervening projections.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Chuj yalnhej and German irgendein share the same flavor inventory (epistemic + random choice) but differ in status.

    Upper-bounded items are a proper subset: only algún and uno cualquiera impose anti-singleton inferences.

    Yalnhej is the only item that is both at-issue AND has both epistemic and random choice flavors. This is the core empirical contribution of @cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2024}.

    The three dimensions are logically independent: we find items in multiple cells of the 2×2 (status × upper-bounded) matrix.

    Consistency check: at-issue status aligns with anchor constraint across all entries. At-issue items use event-relative anchoring (anchorConstraint = some _); not-at-issue items use different mechanisms (conversational implicature for algún, domain widening for irgendein) and have anchorConstraint = none. This is true by construction of the entries — verifying we encoded the paper's §4 classification correctly.

    Volitional-only anchor constraint correlates with lacking epistemic: uno cualquiera's f requires normative content, blocking speech event anchoring (speech acts lack normative content).

    Unrestricted anchor constraint is necessary but not sufficient for epistemic: yalnhej gets epistemic because f is defined for the speech event, but n'importe quel and un qualsiasi are unrestricted yet only have circumstantial (their lexical semantics restricts to indiscriminacy/FC readings).

    Structural position of a DP in the Chuj clause. Factored from verb volitionality (an orthogonal property of the predicate, not of the structural position).

    • external : ChujArgPosition

      External argument (above vP): subject of transitive

    • internal : ChujArgPosition

      Internal argument (within vP): object, complement

    • adjunct : ChujArgPosition

      Adjunct (adjoined to vP): locative, manner, etc.

    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Map structural position to accessible event binders.

        External args are above vP: the closest event binder is the speech act (or attitude) event. The VP event is inaccessible because the external argument is merged above the aspectual projection that binds the VP event variable.

        Internal args and adjuncts are within/adjoined to vP: both the speech act event and the VP event are structurally accessible.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The MI flavor projected by a given event binder. Speech act events project epistemic; VP events project circumstantial. DERIVED from EventBinder.toAnchorType + AnchorType.toFlavor (defined in EventRelativity.lean), not stipulated.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Base MI flavors = one flavor per accessible binder, derived from the EventBinder infrastructure in EventRelativity. External: [epistemic]. Internal/adjunct: [epistemic, circumstantial].

            Equations
            Instances For
              def AlonsoOvalleRoyer2024.rcAvailable (pos : ChujArgPosition) (volitional : Bool) :
              Bool

              Whether the random choice (RC) reading is available. RC requires TWO conditions: (a) VP event is structurally accessible (internal or adjunct position) (b) verb is volitional (decision subevent provides the anchoring point)

              This captures @cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2024}'s core structural explanation: the RC flavor comes from the VP event, but only volitional events contain a decision subevent that can serve as the anchor.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Predicted MI flavors for a given position and volitionality. When RC is not available, the circumstantial flavor (projected from the VP event) is blocked, leaving only epistemic.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Position matters: external ≠ internal flavor sets (with volitional verb).

                  Volitionality matters: internal volitional ≠ internal non-volitional.

                  Internal and adjunct pattern alike (same accessible binders).

                  The full derivation chain connecting Chuj clause structure to MI flavor predictions:

                  VoiceHead.hasD → argPosition → accessibleBinderspredictedMIFlavors
                  

                  hasD is the structural claim: Voice heads with [D] introduce a specifier in Spec,VoiceP (above vP, hence above AspP). This DP's event variable is bound by the speech act event (e₀), not by Asp's ∃e₂. Voice heads without [D] have no specifier — the highest DP is the internal argument (below AspP), accessible to both e₀ and e₂.

                  Derive argument position from Voice head: [+D] → external (above AspP), [-D] → internal (below AspP). This is the structural claim that replaces the stipulated position mapping.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    End-to-end: Voice head determines MI flavor availability. Given a Voice head and verb volitionality, predict the MI flavors by composing the full derivation chain.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Yalnhej is not upper-bounded: compatible with partial-domain scenarios where not all P are Q. This distinguishes it from maximal free relatives (whatever), which require all domain members to satisfy the scope. The EventRelativity worked example demonstrates this concretely with yalnhej_nonmaximal_ab (ModalIndefinites.lean).

                      Multi-flavor items: can express BOTH epistemic and RC. @cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2024}, §6.2: yalnhej and irgendein tolerate more than one modal flavour.

                      Epistemic-only items: algún conveys only speaker ignorance (§6.2, example 118).

                      RC-only items: uno cualquiera, n'importe quel, un qualsiasi, komon convey only random choice / indiscriminacy (§6.2, examples 119–121).

                      Predicativity correlates with unremarkable readings across all entries. Items that can appear in predicative position also have non-modal ("unremarkable") readings. Derived directly from fragment entry fields — no intermediate data structures needed.

                      Number-neutral items lack upper-boundedness. (Footnote 18 of @cite{alonso-ovalle-royer-2024}, p.32, attributed to Louise McNally: wh-phrase origin → number neutrality → incompatible with anti-singleton inference, since anti-singleton presupposes a singleton alternative.)

                      Under an external modal (imperative, deontic, attitude verb), the MI's anchor can be co-indexed with the modal's event binder, giving "any X is fine" readings (harmonic). When the anchor is independent (bound to the described event), the result is "a random X" (non-harmonic).

                      Same surface form, two readings:

                      The distinction maps directly to EventBinder:

                      Non-harmonic anchoring: MI bound to VP event → circumstantial only. VP events lack propositional content (content licensing).

                      Harmonic anchoring: MI co-indexed with speech act → both flavors. Speech acts are contentful (epistemic available).

                      The two readings are formally distinct: non-harmonic and harmonic anchoring yield different available flavor profiles from the same MI, explaining the ambiguity of yalnhej under imperatives.

                      Concrete model-theoretic witnesses for the typological claims of Part I. These instantiate Theories/Semantics/Modality/ModalIndefinites.lean on small finite domains to demonstrate (a) non-maximality, (b) the upper-bounded vs. non-upper-bounded contrast, and (c) the harmonic vs. non-harmonic anchoring distinction. The toy domains live here in the study file (per CLAUDE.md: examples that name a paper's analyses belong with the paper, not in the abstract theory file).

                      Three books for testing the modal indefinite semantics.

                      Instances For
                        @[implicit_reducible]
                        Equations
                        def AlonsoOvalleRoyer2024.instReprBook.repr :
                        BookStd.Format
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Three possible worlds varying in which books are available.

                          Instances For
                            @[implicit_reducible]
                            Equations
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              @[implicit_reducible]
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              @[implicit_reducible]
                              Equations

                              A speech event and a described event.

                              Instances For
                                @[implicit_reducible]
                                Equations
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Yalnhej is compatible with partial-domain scenarios: the speaker can felicitously use yalnhej even when not all P are Q. This distinguishes it from maximal free relatives (whatever), which require every domain member to satisfy the scope. Unlike upper-boundedness (which blocks ∀P→Q), non-maximality is about COMPATIBILITY with ¬∀P→Q — a weaker property.

                                  We demonstrate non-maximality using the 3-book model: in world ab (books a,b available but NOT c), the MI denotation still holds because every book is available in SOME accessible world, even though not every book is available in the actual world.

                                  MI holds in world ab where book c is NOT available. The existential component (∃x P∧Q) holds (book a is available). The modal component (∀y P→◇Q) holds (each book is available in some accessible world). Crucially, ¬∀y P→Q(y)(ab): book c is not available in ab. This shows yalnhej is compatible with not-all-P-being-Q — non-maximality.

                                  When a modal indefinite occurs under an external modal (imperative, deontic, attitude verb), the MI's anchoring event can be CO-INDEXED with the external modal's event. This "harmonic" configuration gives "any X is fine" readings — the MI's modal domain aligns with the embedding modal's domain.

                                  Non-harmonic: the MI's anchor is independent of the external modal. "Grab yalnhej card" = grab a random card (MI anchors to described event). Harmonic: the MI's anchor is co-indexed with the imperative/deontic event. "Grab yalnhej card" = any card is fine (MI anchors to imperative event).

                                  We model this with a card-grabbing scenario: three cards, worlds varying in which cards are grabbable, and two event types (local vs imperative).

                                  Three cards for testing harmonic readings.

                                  Instances For
                                    @[implicit_reducible]
                                    Equations
                                    def AlonsoOvalleRoyer2024.instReprCard.repr :
                                    CardStd.Format
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Three worlds varying in which cards are grabbable.

                                      Instances For
                                        @[implicit_reducible]
                                        Equations
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Three event types: speech, local (described), imperative.

                                          Instances For
                                            @[implicit_reducible]
                                            Equations
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Non-harmonic MI fails: when the MI anchors to the local event, only world only1 is accessible. In only1, only c1 is grabbable. The modal component ∀y[card(y) → ◇_{local}(grab(y))] fails because c2 and c3 are not grabbable in any locally accessible world.

                                              Harmonic MI succeeds: when the MI's anchor is co-indexed with the imperative event, all worlds are accessible. Every card is grabbable in some world (c1 in only1, c2 in only2, c3 in all). The modal component ∀y[card(y) → ◇_{imperative}(grab(y))] holds. This gives the "any card is fine" reading.