Docs / Morphology / Exponence / Containment / Contiguity

Containment hierarchies: contiguity and the suppletion generalizations

import Linglib.Morphology.Exponence.Containment.Contiguity · namespace Morphology.Containment

This file proves the *ABA generalization and its refinements for the two realizational engines over a containment hierarchy. Over antihomophonous rule sets both engines realize contiguous patterns, since applicability is closed upward for rules of exponence and downward for lexical entries, and each engine generates every contiguous pattern, so Elsewhere insertion from terminal rule sets and Superset spellout generate the same fully realized patterns. Over the three-grade degree hierarchy, terminal adjacent rule sets realize the comparative and the superlative alike, grounded rule sets exclude AAB, and so do rule sets meeting the markedness condition with adjacent contexts, and a superlative root distinct from the comparative one needs a portmanteau.

Main definitions

Main results

References

*ABA

The plateau: terminal adjacency generates only AAA and ABB

Completeness: Elsewhere-generable = contiguous

L87–89
L99–100
L117–119

Three-grade hierarchies: *AAB and the portmanteau prediction

Over the three-grade degree hierarchy, a grounded antihomophonous rule set that realizes the positive and the comparative alike and realizes the superlative realizes all three alike, so good – gooder – best is not generable. Grounding alone does the work that Bobaljik 2012 ch. 5 assigns to the markedness condition and adjacency together (realize_const_of_markedness).

theorem realize_const_of_groundedL170–192
{F : Type u_1} {v : Exponence.RuleSet (SpanRule 3 F)} (hv : v.Antihomophonous) (hG : Grounded v) (h01 : realize v 0 = realize v 1) (h2 : (realize v 2).isSome = true) :
realize v 1 = realize v 2

*AAB (Bobaljik 2012 ch. 5): over the three-grade degree hierarchy, an antihomophonous rule set meeting the markedness condition with adjacent contexts that realizes the positive and the comparative alike and realizes the superlative realizes all three alike.

theorem realize_const_of_markednessL194–201
{F : Type u_1} {v : Exponence.RuleSet (SpanRule 3 F)} (hv : v.Antihomophonous) (hM : Markedness v) (hA : Adjacent v) (h01 : realize v 0 = realize v 1) (h2 : (realize v 2).isSome = true) :
realize v 1 = realize v 2

Over the three-grade hierarchy the groundedly generable patterns are the contiguous ones but AAB, that is AAA, ABB and ABC: the canonical rule set of such a pattern is grounded.

theorem groundedGenerable_iffL221–250
{F : Type u_1} [DecidableEq F] (p : Paradigm 3 F) :
GroundedGenerable p ↔ IsContiguous p ∧ ¬(p 0 = p 1 ∧ p 1 ≠ p 2)

Built from

Completeness: Superset-spellable = contiguous

L262–263

Where the engines diverge

On partial rule sets the selection directions come apart: an entry storing more structure spells out smaller structures under the Superset Principle, while the corresponding rule leaves a gap under Elsewhere insertion, nanosyntax's characteristic prediction (De Clercq & Vanden Wyngaerd 2017).

Antihomophony is necessary for *ABA

Two entries sharing an exponent generate ABA. Caha 2009 separates such accidental homophony from syncretism, one entry over a contiguous span, and RuleSet.Antihomophonous is that separation.