Wang (2023): Honorifics without [HON] #
Across Wang's survey the values recruited for honorific pronouns are plural number, third person and indefiniteness, never singular, first or second person, or definites (Table 1, (28)). These are the semantically unmarked values, the ones carrying the weakest presupposition (54)–(56), which the feature bundles order by specification. Recruitment follows from the Taboo of Directness (57), which in respect contexts demands the weakest presupposition, ranked above Heim's Maximize Presupposition! (59), which demands the strongest. Number systems with a dual (80) also need a weak taboo that avoids only the strongest presupposition (82), and the four attested patterns of honorific nonsingulars are the rankings of (83).
Main results #
tod_mp_general: Taboo » MP! selects the least specified cell alone, so no honorific singular, local person or definite arises.stod_mp_wtod,wtod_mp_stod,wtod_alone: the rankings of (83) give honorific plural only, dual only, and the non-escalating systems.
Implementation notes #
The cells are the number bundles Number.Features, singular, dual and plural being the most, the
intermediate and the least specified, the lower sets of the chain minimal < atomic; person and
definiteness bundles have the same shape. The constraints count violations by the size of a
bundle, the taboo as the size itself and MP! as its shortfall from the full bundle. The ternary
tableaux are decided by the kernel. The paper's examples are the rows of
Data.Examples.Wang2023.
TODO #
- MP! (59) chooses the strongest presupposition compatible with what is assumed, a condition at
the context, while
mpConstraintcounts a bundle's shortfall from the full bundle. On the lower sets of the chain the two agree when every stronger bundle is compatible, the shortfall being the number of strictly stronger competitors; deriving the constraint fromCompetition.unblockedoverNumber.domwaits on the dual's minimality domain, whichNumber.domdoes not yet restrict.
References #
The recruited values are the least specified cells (§4.1) #
The plural is the least specified number cell, the empty bundle (54).
The third person is the least specified person cell, the empty bundle (55).
The Taboo of Directness and Maximize Presupposition! (§4.2) #
The Taboo of Directness (57) asks in respect contexts for the form with the weakest presupposition; as a constraint it penalizes presuppositional strength.
Equations
- Wang2023.todConstraint = Finset.card
Instances For
Maximize Presupposition! (59) asks for the form with the strongest presupposition; as a constraint it penalizes the shortfall from the maximal strength.
Equations
- Wang2023.mpConstraint c = Fintype.card Number.Feature - Finset.card c
Instances For
The two maxims order well-formed cells oppositely.
A candidate with violations of the top constraint loses to one without.
Under Taboo » MP! every optimal candidate is the least specified cell.
The least specified cell is optimal under Taboo » MP!, its profile being lexicographically least.
Taboo » MP! selects the least specified cell alone from any well-formed candidate set that contains it: the emergence of the semantically unmarked.
With the taboo on top, the most specified cell, singular, local person or definite, is never optimal beside a less specified competitor, so these honorifics are unattested (28).
Articulated number systems (§5) #
The weak Taboo of Directness (82b) avoids the form with the strongest presupposition.
Equations
- Wang2023.wtodConstraint c = if Finset.card c = Fintype.card Number.Feature then 1 else 0
Instances For
The singular, dual and plural of an articulated number system (80).
Equations
Instances For
The weak taboo alone also excludes the most specified cell.
Strong taboo » MP! » weak taboo recruits the plural only, as in Slovenian (83b).
Weak taboo » MP! » strong taboo recruits the dual only, as in Mwotlap and Kharia (83a).
The weak taboo alone leaves dual and plural, the non-escalating system of Imere (83d).
Outside respect contexts MP! on top recruits the singular.