Waldon et al. (2023): On the Context Dependence of Artifact Noun Interpretation #
Waldon, Condoravdi, Levin and Degen ask how a policy goal shapes the boundary of an artifact
noun category, as in no electronic devices are allowed in the theater read with the goal of
limiting light or of limiting noise. Following Sassoon and Fadlon, an artifact noun denotes an
additive, weighted measure over several dimensions. The paper makes the weights contextual: an
explicit goal weights the category measure by γ and the goal-relevant feature by 1 − γ, and
with no goal stated the goal weight is split by the goals' plausibility. With a uniform
threshold and an even prior, the posterior that an object is prohibited is the measure itself.
The Goal Insensitive hypothesis is γ = 1; the experiment's Bayesian analysis estimates γ at
about 0.76, with 1 outside the credible interval.
Main statements #
prohibitionPosterior_eq: the posterior that an object is prohibited is its measure.not_threshold_shift: one goal raising an object and lowering another is not a shift of the standard of comparison.
Implementation notes #
Objects and goals are types, and the category, feature and plausibility measures of the
norming studies are the fields of Norming, bounded as the slider scales are, in place of
values retyped from the paper; every prediction is stated over them and over γ. The
posterior is the Bayes ratio with the threshold marginalized by Lebesgue measure on [0, m].
The paper's examples are the rows of Data.Examples.WaldonEtAl2023.
References #
The norming data and the contextual measure #
The norming studies (§3.1) supply the category-membership measure cat and the
goal-relevant feature measures, on the unit interval, and the plausibility of the goals, a
distribution.
- cat : O → ℝ
- feature : G → O → ℝ
- plausibility : G → ℝ
- cat_mem (o : O) : self.cat o ∈ Set.Icc 0 1
- plausibility_nonneg (g : G) : 0 ≤ self.plausibility g
- plausibility_sum : ∑ g : G, self.plausibility g = 1
Instances For
The goal-weighted measure of the artifact noun, (13) under an explicit goal and (14) with the goal weight split by plausibility, is a weighted sum of the category and the goal dimensions.
Equations
- WaldonEtAl2023.measure N γ (WaldonEtAl2023.Condition.explicit g) = fun (o : O) => γ * N.cat o + (1 - γ) * N.feature g o
- WaldonEtAl2023.measure N γ WaldonEtAl2023.Condition.neutral = fun (o : O) => γ * N.cat o + (1 - γ) * ∑ g : G, N.plausibility g * N.feature g o
Instances For
The plausibility-weighted feature lies on the unit interval.
The interpretive model (12) #
The probability that a measure meets a standard uniform on the unit interval is the Lebesgue
mass of [0, m].
Equations
- WaldonEtAl2023.meetsProb m = MeasureTheory.volume (Set.Icc 0 m)
Instances For
The posterior that an object of measure m is prohibited is the Bayes ratio of (12) with an
even prior and the threshold marginalized.
Equations
- WaldonEtAl2023.prohibitionPosterior m = 2⁻¹ * WaldonEtAl2023.meetsProb m / (2⁻¹ * WaldonEtAl2023.meetsProb m + 2⁻¹ * (1 - WaldonEtAl2023.meetsProb m))
Instances For
The posterior is the measure.
Every prediction is a comparison of measures.
Goal sensitivity (§4.3) #
Under Goal Sensitivity, an object's measure across explicit goals orders by its goal-relevant features.
An explicit goal moves an object away from the neutral baseline by the goal weight times the excess of the goal's feature over the plausibility-weighted mix.
Under Goal Sensitivity one goal raises an object whose feature exceeds the mix and lowers one whose feature falls short of it, the flashlight and the boombox under the goal of limiting light.
No single shift of the standard of comparison is bidirectional. With one measure and two thresholds, an object included under the second but not the first and another included under the first but not the second cannot both exist.