Documentation

Studies.Smith1997

Smith (1997): The Parameter of Aspect #

This file formalizes the two-component theory of [Smi97]: aspectual meaning factors into a situation type (VendlerClass) and a viewpoint (ViewpointType), independent and freely combined. The visibility properties of chapter 4 are not stipulated per viewpoint: whether a viewpoint asserts the initial point or the final point of the situation, presents it as closed, or focuses an interval inside it are predicates over the substrate's relation between topic time and situation time, and the chapter's table of what each viewpoint makes visible is recovered as four theorems (showsInitialPoint_iff, showsFinalPoint_iff, presentsClosed_iff, focusesPreliminaryStages_iff). The perfective makes both endpoints visible and is closed, the imperfective makes neither visible and is open, and the neutral viewpoint of section 4.2.3 sits between them, including the initial point and at least one stage but never the preliminary stages that separate it from the imperfective (perfective_closed, imperfective_open, neutral_intermediate, neutral_no_preliminary_stages). Section 4.2 records the viewpoint inventories of the four languages of Part II and the three relations between the perfective and statives (Language.system); the perfective conveys completion for telic and termination for atelic situation types (perfectiveEffect, completion_iff_telic); and the imperfective paradox of section 4.3.2 is the invisibility of a telic situation's final point under a viewpoint that does not show it (CompletionInvisible).

Implementation notes #

References #

Visibility, section 4.1 #

The viewpoint asserts the initial point of the situation.

Equations
Instances For

    The viewpoint asserts the final point of the situation.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The viewpoint presents the situation as closed: the topic time reaches its final point.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The viewpoint focuses a topic time strictly inside the situation.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The initial point: the perfective and the neutral viewpoint assert it.

          The final point: only the perfective asserts it.

          Closure: the perfective and the perfect present the situation as closed.

          Preliminary stages: only the imperfective places the topic time strictly inside the situation.

          The perfective makes both endpoints visible and presents the situation as closed, section 4.2.1.

          The neutral viewpoint is intermediate, section 4.2.3: the initial point visible as under the perfective, the final point unasserted as under the imperfective, and open.

          Only the imperfective focuses preliminary stages, the discriminator between the neutral viewpoint and the imperfective, section 4.2.3, (41).

          The independence of the components, section 4.3 #

          An aspectual interpretation: a situation type and a viewpoint, chosen independently.

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              The imperfective paradox, section 4.3.2: the situation type is visible whatever the viewpoint, so a telic situation's natural endpoint is known though not asserted under a viewpoint that does not show the final point.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Completion is invisible exactly for telic situation types under a non-perfective viewpoint.

                We were walking to school, (47): an accomplishment under the imperfective.

                The perfective's final point, section 4.2.1 #

                The perfective presents its situation as closed, and the closed situation is completed or terminated according to its situation type, (10) and (11).

                What the perfective conveys of the final point: completion for a telic situation type, termination for an atelic one, and nothing under another viewpoint.

                Instances For
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  Equations

                  The perfective effect of an aspectual interpretation.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Under the perfective, completion is conveyed exactly by the telic situation types.

                    The imperfective conveys neither completion nor termination.

                    The aspectual systems of Part II, section 4.2 #

                    The relation between the perfective and statives, section 4.2.1: the perfective includes the changes into and out of a state and closes it (French); it presents states open or closed (English); or it does not apply to statives (Russian, Chinese, Navajo).

                    Instances For
                      @[instance_reducible]
                      Equations

                      The interaction of viewpoint and situation type, section 4.2: an asymmetric system in which one viewpoint is limited and the dominant one is available to every situation type, a system in which every viewpoint is available to every situation type, or one in which statives lie outside the viewpoint system.

                      Instances For

                        A language's aspectual system: its viewpoints, their interaction with situation type, and the treatment of statives by the perfective.

                        Instances For
                          def Smith1997.instDecidableEqAspectualSystem.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : AspectualSystem) :
                          Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            The four languages of Part II.

                            Instances For
                              @[instance_reducible]
                              Equations

                              The systems of section 4.2: English has the perfective and the progressive, the perfective dominant, and presents states open or closed; French has the perfective, the imperfective and the neutral viewpoint of its Futur, every viewpoint available to every situation type, and its perfective closes states; Mandarin has perfectives, imperfectives and the neutral viewpoint of a sentence without a viewpoint morpheme, and Navajo the perfective, the imperfective and the neutral viewpoint of its Usitative and Iterative, both keeping statives outside the viewpoint system.

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                A language whose perfective does not apply to statives keeps them outside its viewpoint system, and conversely.