Documentation

Studies.Sharvit2003

Sharvit (2003): Embedded Tense and Universal Grammar #

Sharvit derives a tense typology from two parameters. Under the Deletion Theory of Ogihara and von Stechow, an SOT language deletes an embedded tense under agreement with a c-commanding attitude tense, leaving a bound zero tense, Heim's relative now; after Schlenker, matrix indexicality decides whether a present under a past must refer to the utterance time. English deletes and has an indexical present, Hebrew does neither, Modern Greek deletes and has a bindable present, and the fourth type is unattested, as the Embeddability Principle (13) predicts: every matrix LF needs a content-matching λ0-abstract embeddable under an attitude verb, and the fourth type has no source of zero tense.

Main results #

Implementation notes #

References #

The typology (11) #

Whether a language's present-tense morpheme is a matrix indexical, obligatorily referring to the utterance time in present-under-past sentences, or may be interpreted as a bound variable.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A language type of the Deletion Theory (11) is given by whether it has the SOT rule, which deletes a tense under agreement and interprets it as a bound zero tense, and by the indexicality of its present.

      • sotRule : Bool

        The language has the SOT rule.

      • present : PresentTense
      Instances For
        def Sharvit2003.instDecidableEqLanguage.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : Language) :
        Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
        Equations
        Instances For
          def Sharvit2003.instReprLanguage.repr :
          Language → ℕ → Std.Format
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            English, type 1, has the SOT rule and a matrix-indexical present.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Hebrew, type 2, has no SOT rule and a bindable present.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Modern Greek, type 3, has the SOT rule and a bindable present.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  The unattested type 4 has no SOT rule and a matrix-indexical present.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Zero tense and the Embeddability Principle #

                    The sources of a bound zero tense in a complement clause are a tense deleted under agreement by the SOT rule and a present morpheme interpreted as a bound variable.

                    Instances For
                      @[instance_reducible]
                      Equations
                      def Sharvit2003.instReprZeroTense.repr :
                      ZeroTense → ℕ → Std.Format
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        A language provides a source of zero tense when it has what the source needs, the SOT rule for deletion and a present morpheme that is not a matrix indexical for a bound present.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The Embeddability Principle (13), as a condition on a language, says that some source of zero tense is available, so that every well-formed matrix LF has a content-matching λ0-abstract that can be embedded under an attitude verb carrying past or present.

                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            @[instance_reducible]
                            Equations

                            Exactly type 4 violates the Embeddability Principle.

                            English embeds Mary is pregnant by deleting a tense, Hebrew by binding its present, and Modern Greek either way.

                            The readings #

                            The nonpast reading of past under past is the simultaneous reading of a deleted tense; the nonpast reading of present under past is the binding of the present morpheme.

                            The morpheme embedded under the past attitude verb.

                            Instances For
                              @[instance_reducible]
                              Equations
                              def Sharvit2003.instReprEmbedded.repr :
                              Embedded → ℕ → Std.Format
                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                The nonpast reading is available for an embedded past exactly when the SOT rule licenses the simultaneous reading (Tense.pastUnderPast), and for an embedded present exactly when the present can be bound.

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  The simultaneous reading of a deleted tense is available exactly in languages with the SOT rule, since the two parameters of the typology are the two sources of zero tense.

                                  theorem Sharvit2003.boundPresent_nonpast {T : Type u_1} {W : Type u_2} [LinearOrder T] (n e : ℕ) (g : Assignment T) (now : T) (w : W) :
                                  (Tense.pronoun (Semantics.Denotes.denote Tense.present) n e).presup (Function.update (Function.update g e now) n now) w

                                  A bindable present bound by the attitude verb denotes the attitude's now, the time of its evaluation index, so its present presupposition holds there, which is the nonpast reading of (5) and (12a).

                                  theorem Sharvit2003.indexicalPresent_no_nonpast {T : Type u_1} {W : Type u_2} [LinearOrder T] {n e : ℕ} {g : Assignment T} {w : W} (hSpeech : (Tense.pronoun (Semantics.Denotes.denote Tense.present) n 0).presup g w) (hlt : g e < g 0) :

                                  A matrix-indexical present under a past attitude verb refers to the utterance time, the time of the index 0, which the attitude's earlier now cannot match, so its present presupposition fails at the attitude's now and (3) has only the double access reading.

                                  theorem Sharvit2003.not_doubleAccess_of_short {T : Type u_1} [Sub T] [Preorder T] {I : Set T} {b u : T} (h : ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ I, y - x < u - b) :
                                  ¬{b, u} ⊆ I

                                  The double access reading of (4b) needs the pregnancy interval to contain both the finding out and the utterance time; an interval too short to span the two years between them cannot, hence the oddity.

                                  The nonpast reading of (1) under the Deletion Theory #

                                  def Sharvit2003.attitude {T : Type u_1} (compatible : T → Set T) (p : T → Prop) (t : T) :

                                  By the entry (8) for decide and tell, the complement holds at every time compatible with what the holder decides or tells at t.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For
                                    def Sharvit2003.will {T : Type u_1} [LT T] (p : T → Prop) (t : T) :

                                    By the entry (9) for will, the complement holds at some later time, possibility along the relation of the future cell.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For
                                      def Sharvit2003.lf7 {T : Type u_1} [LT T] (decides tells : T → Set T) (miss : T → Prop) (g : Assignment T) :

                                      In the LF (7) of the nonpast reading of (1), the matrix past locates the deciding before the utterance time, the time of the index 0, and each complement is a λ0-abstract that rebinds the zero tense read by the deleted past on will, the base-generated zero tense on tell and the deleted past on miss.

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For
                                        theorem Sharvit2003.lf7_iff {T : Type u_1} [LT T] (decides tells : T → Set T) (miss : T → Prop) (g : Assignment T) :
                                        lf7 decides tells miss g ↔ ∃ t < g 0, ∀ t' ∈ decides t, ∃ (t'' : T), t' < t'' ∧ ∀ t''' ∈ tells t'', miss t'''

                                        The LF (7) has the interpretation (10), that for every time compatible with what John decides at some time before the utterance time there is a later time at which he tells his mother, and he misses her at every time compatible with that telling.

                                        The paper's examples #

                                        A row of the paper's data records the language, the embedded morpheme, and whether the nonpast reading is available.

                                        Instances For
                                          def Sharvit2003.instDecidableEqRow.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : Row) :
                                          Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For
                                            def Sharvit2003.instReprRow.repr :
                                            Row → ℕ → Std.Format
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For
                                              @[instance_reducible]
                                              Equations

                                              Read a row off an example's paper features.

                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                The rows of (1)–(6) and (12).

                                                Equations
                                                Instances For
                                                  theorem Sharvit2003.rows_complete (e : Datum) :
                                                  e ∈ Examples.all → (Row.ofDatum e).isSome = true

                                                  Every example carries the three features.

                                                  theorem Sharvit2003.nonpast_rows (r : Row) :
                                                  r ∈ rows → (r.nonpast = true ↔ NonpastAvailable r.language r.embedded)

                                                  The typology (11) predicts the paper's judgments, the nonpast reading being available exactly where the language provides a zero tense for the embedded morpheme.