Pesetsky (1995): Zero Syntax #
This file formalizes the Cascade account in [Pes95] of the Target/Subject Matter
restriction on object-experiencer verbs, the impossibility of expressing a Causer together
with a Target or Subject Matter, the article annoyed Bill at the government. The verb's
arguments sit in a right-branching Cascade of prepositional projections (Cascade), and the
causative reading comes from a zero preposition CAUS, an adjunct-like head situated below the
selected arguments, which is an affix and must have reached the verb by phonological form
(510). Head movement is successive adjunction to each intervening preposition, and a category
headed by a non-affix cannot move on, so CAUS reaches the verb exactly when every preposition
above it is affixal (canReachV, canReachV_append). The prepositions at and about
that introduce Target and Subject Matter are not affixes, so CAUS is stranded below them
(tsm_restriction), whereas nothing intervenes when the stimulus is absent
(caus_reaches_without_stimulus); the same mechanism derives Oehrle's observation that the
causative reading of give survives in the double object construction, whose zero
preposition G is an affix, but not with to (oehrle). Since CAUS starts below the
selected arguments, the Causer originates below the Experiencer and raises to subject, which
is why object-experiencer verbs show backward binding, the experiencer binding into the
reconstructed causer (§6.2.2, experiencer_ccommands_causer). The verb classes of
[BR88] from which the book's linking problem starts are recorded with the
subject role each predicts (PsychVerbClass, SubjectRole).
Implementation notes #
Only the prepositions of the restriction and of the double object alternation are represented. The affixal and prepositional occurrences of CAUS of §6.3, the suppression of the external argument in (522), the semantics of prepositions and mediated θ-selection of the fifth chapter, and the account of heavy shift of the seventh are not formalized.
References #
Cascades #
A prepositional head of a Cascade: whether it is overt or a zero morpheme, and whether it is an affix that must join the verb.
- overt : Bool
- affixal : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.instDecidableEqCascadeHead.decEq { overt := a, affixal := a_1 } { overt := b, affixal := b_1 } = if h : a = b then h ▸ if h : a_1 = b_1 then h ▸ isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Instances For
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.instDecidableEqPhrase x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The heads from the verb downward.
Equations
- (Pesetsky1995.Cascade.complement phrase).spine = []
- (Pesetsky1995.Cascade.layer h spec rest).spine = h :: rest.spine
Instances For
The position of a phrase, counted from the top, the final complement one below the last layer.
Equations
- (Pesetsky1995.Cascade.complement p).position x✝ = if p = x✝ then some 0 else none
- (Pesetsky1995.Cascade.layer head spec rest).position x✝ = if spec = x✝ then some 0 else Option.map (fun (x : ℕ) => x + 1) (rest.position x✝)
Instances For
The head at position i of a spine can reach the verb by successive adjunction exactly
when every head above it is affixal: adjunction to a non-affix yields a category that cannot
move on, the Head Movement Constraint.
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.canReachV spine i = ∀ (h : Pesetsky1995.CascadeHead), h ∈ List.take i spine → h.affixal = true
Instances For
Equations
A head below a given stretch of the spine reaches the verb iff that stretch is affixal throughout.
CAUS: the zero causative preposition, an affix (510).
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.caus = { overt := false, affixal := true }
Instances For
G: the zero preposition of the double object construction, an affix.
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.headG = { overt := false, affixal := true }
Instances For
at, introducing a Target: overt and not an affix.
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.headAt = { overt := true, affixal := false }
Instances For
about, introducing a Subject Matter: overt and not an affix.
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.headAbout = { overt := true, affixal := false }
Instances For
to of the dative construction: overt and not an affix.
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.headTo = { overt := true, affixal := false }
Instances For
The Target/Subject Matter restriction (§6.2.1) #
The two roles into which the book divides the object of an emotion: the Target the emotion is directed at, as in angry at the government, and the Subject Matter it is about, as in worried about the television set.
- target : StimulusType
- subjectMatter : StimulusType
Instances For
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.instDecidableEqStimulusType x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.instReprStimulusType = { reprPrec := Pesetsky1995.instReprStimulusType.repr }
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The preposition that introduces each stimulus type.
Equations
Instances For
The phrase of each stimulus type.
Equations
Instances For
(513): the Experiencer in the specifier of the stimulus preposition, the stimulus in the specifier of CAUS, and the Causer as CAUS's complement.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
(514): the Experiencer in the specifier of CAUS, with no stimulus.
Equations
Instances For
Both stimulus prepositions are non-affixes, so Target and Subject Matter block alike.
The restriction: with a Target or Subject Matter present, CAUS cannot reach the verb.
Without a stimulus nothing intervenes and CAUS reaches the verb.
Oehrle's observation (§6.2.1) #
(511): the double object construction with a causative reading, G above CAUS.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
(512): the to-dative with CAUS below to.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The causative reading of give, the war years gave Mailer his first big success, survives in the double object construction, whose G is an affix, and not with to.
Backward binding (§6.2.2) #
The Experiencer c-commands the Causer's base position with or without a stimulus: the Causer is a derived subject, raised from below the Experiencer, and reconstructs there, so the Experiencer can bind into it.
The classes of Belletti and Rizzi #
The classes of [BR88] from which the linking problem starts: experiencer-subject verbs, object-experiencer verbs, and the dative-experiencer verbs of Italian.
- classI : PsychVerbClass
- classII : PsychVerbClass
- classIII : PsychVerbClass
Instances For
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.instDecidableEqPsychVerbClass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- Pesetsky1995.instDecidableEqSubjectRole x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
The subject role each class predicts; the dative-experiencer class has no nominative subject among its two arguments.