Documentation

Studies.Pesetsky1995

Pesetsky (1995): Zero Syntax #

This file formalizes the Cascade account in [Pes95] of the Target/Subject Matter restriction on object-experiencer verbs, the impossibility of expressing a Causer together with a Target or Subject Matter, the article annoyed Bill at the government. The verb's arguments sit in a right-branching Cascade of prepositional projections (Cascade), and the causative reading comes from a zero preposition CAUS, an adjunct-like head situated below the selected arguments, which is an affix and must have reached the verb by phonological form (510). Head movement is successive adjunction to each intervening preposition, and a category headed by a non-affix cannot move on, so CAUS reaches the verb exactly when every preposition above it is affixal (canReachV, canReachV_append). The prepositions at and about that introduce Target and Subject Matter are not affixes, so CAUS is stranded below them (tsm_restriction), whereas nothing intervenes when the stimulus is absent (caus_reaches_without_stimulus); the same mechanism derives Oehrle's observation that the causative reading of give survives in the double object construction, whose zero preposition G is an affix, but not with to (oehrle). Since CAUS starts below the selected arguments, the Causer originates below the Experiencer and raises to subject, which is why object-experiencer verbs show backward binding, the experiencer binding into the reconstructed causer (§6.2.2, experiencer_ccommands_causer). The verb classes of [BR88] from which the book's linking problem starts are recorded with the subject role each predicts (PsychVerbClass, SubjectRole).

Implementation notes #

Only the prepositions of the restriction and of the double object alternation are represented. The affixal and prepositional occurrences of CAUS of §6.3, the suppression of the external argument in (522), the semantics of prepositions and mediated θ-selection of the fifth chapter, and the account of heavy shift of the seventh are not formalized.

References #

Cascades #

A prepositional head of a Cascade: whether it is overt or a zero morpheme, and whether it is an affix that must join the verb.

  • overt : Bool
  • affixal : Bool
Instances For
    def Pesetsky1995.instDecidableEqCascadeHead.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : CascadeHead) :
    Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
    Equations
    Instances For

      The phrases a Cascade positions.

      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations

        A Cascade: the right-branching spine of prepositional projections below a verb, each layer a head with the phrase in its specifier, ending in the complement of the lowest head.

        Instances For

          The heads from the verb downward.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The position of a phrase, counted from the top, the final complement one below the last layer.

            Equations
            Instances For

              A phrase c-commands another when it sits in a higher layer.

              Equations
              Instances For
                def Pesetsky1995.canReachV (spine : List CascadeHead) (i : ℕ) :

                The head at position i of a spine can reach the verb by successive adjunction exactly when every head above it is affixal: adjunction to a non-affix yields a category that cannot move on, the Head Movement Constraint.

                Equations
                Instances For
                  @[instance_reducible]
                  instance Pesetsky1995.instDecidableCanReachV (spine : List CascadeHead) (i : ℕ) :
                  Decidable (canReachV spine i)
                  Equations
                  theorem Pesetsky1995.canReachV_append (above : List CascadeHead) (h : CascadeHead) (below : List CascadeHead) :
                  canReachV (above ++ h :: below) above.length ↔ ∀ (h' : CascadeHead), h' ∈ above → h'.affixal = true

                  A head below a given stretch of the spine reaches the verb iff that stretch is affixal throughout.

                  CAUS: the zero causative preposition, an affix (510).

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    G: the zero preposition of the double object construction, an affix.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      at, introducing a Target: overt and not an affix.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        about, introducing a Subject Matter: overt and not an affix.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          to of the dative construction: overt and not an affix.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            The Target/Subject Matter restriction (§6.2.1) #

                            The two roles into which the book divides the object of an emotion: the Target the emotion is directed at, as in angry at the government, and the Subject Matter it is about, as in worried about the television set.

                            Instances For
                              @[instance_reducible]
                              Equations
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                (513): the Experiencer in the specifier of the stimulus preposition, the stimulus in the specifier of CAUS, and the Causer as CAUS's complement.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Both stimulus prepositions are non-affixes, so Target and Subject Matter block alike.

                                  The restriction: with a Target or Subject Matter present, CAUS cannot reach the verb.

                                  Without a stimulus nothing intervenes and CAUS reaches the verb.

                                  Oehrle's observation (§6.2.1) #

                                  (511): the double object construction with a causative reading, G above CAUS.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    (512): the to-dative with CAUS below to.

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      The causative reading of give, the war years gave Mailer his first big success, survives in the double object construction, whose G is an affix, and not with to.

                                      Backward binding (§6.2.2) #

                                      The Experiencer c-commands the Causer's base position with or without a stimulus: the Causer is a derived subject, raised from below the Experiencer, and reconstructs there, so the Experiencer can bind into it.

                                      The classes of Belletti and Rizzi #

                                      The classes of [BR88] from which the linking problem starts: experiencer-subject verbs, object-experiencer verbs, and the dative-experiencer verbs of Italian.

                                      Instances For
                                        @[instance_reducible]
                                        Equations

                                        The role of the surface subject.

                                        Instances For
                                          @[instance_reducible]
                                          Equations