Pearson (2015): The Interpretation of the Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe #
Pearson gives a semantics for the Ewe logophoric pronoun yè. On the view of Heim and von Stechow, after Chierchia, an attitude verb binds yè through the individual abstractor it introduces, so the pronoun has the attitude holder as antecedent and must be read de se. Her fieldwork finds it read de se or de re. She keeps the binding and lets yè also sit in a covert constituent with a concept generator, a map from a res to an individual concept. A generator is suitable when it is reliable, returning the res in the actual world or the holder for one of the holder's epistemic alternatives, and its concepts lie in the holder's conceptual cover.
Main statements #
sayDeRe_of_sayDeSe: the de se reading is the de re reading through the self concept, so it entails the de re reading when the holder is acquainted with herself as herself.claimDeRe_reliable: a de re claim about a res needs a concept in the cover that reliably returns it.ye_de_se_de_re_ambiguous: when John praises a paper he does not recognize as his own, the de se reading is false and the de re reading true.napoleon_contrast: when John believes himself Napoleon and calls the patient he sees on television delusional, John claims he is delusional is true and John claims Napoleon is delusional false.
Implementation notes #
- Concepts are functions from centered worlds, the attitude alternatives of Lewis, to
individuals, and a cover of
Semantics/Reference/Acquaintancesupplies acquaintance. - Reliability is checked over a finite res domain, and each scenario is a finite model with one attitude alternative.
- The contrast between yè and PRO, a minimal pronoun that takes no long-distance antecedent, is not formalized.
References #
Concept generators #
A centered attitude alternative is a world with the individual the attitude holder identifies as herself there.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Centered W E = (W × E)
Instances For
An individual concept is a function from centered worlds to individuals, an element of a
Cover.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Concept W E = (Pearson2015.Centered W E → E)
Instances For
A concept generator takes a res to an individual concept.
Equations
- Pearson2015.ConceptGenerator W E = (E → Pearson2015.Concept W E)
Instances For
A centered property holds of an individual at a world.
Equations
- Pearson2015.CProp W E = (E → W → Prop)
Instances For
The epistemic alternatives of the attitude holder are the centers of her attitude alternatives.
Equations
- Pearson2015.epiAlt alts = List.map Prod.snd alts
Instances For
The self concept returns the center of each alternative.
Equations
- Pearson2015.selfConcept = Prod.snd
Instances For
On the de se denotation of say (76), the embedded property holds of the center at each attitude alternative.
Equations
- Pearson2015.sayDeSe alts P = ∀ (p : Pearson2015.Centered W E), p ∈ alts → P p.2 p.1
Instances For
A generator is reliable for holder x in w over the res domain dom (82) when for each res
u its concept returns u in the actual world, or u is an epistemic alternative of x and the
concept returns x.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Reliable alts G x w dom = ∀ (u : E), u ∈ dom → G u (w, x) = u ∨ u ∈ Pearson2015.epiAlt alts ∧ G u (w, x) = x
Instances For
A generator is suitable for x in w (82) when it is reliable and acquaintance-based, each
concept it produces lying in the holder's cover.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Suitable cover alts G x w dom = (Pearson2015.Reliable alts G x w dom ∧ ∀ (u : E), u ∈ dom → G u ∈ cover)
Instances For
On the de re denotation of say for a pronoun res (77), (79), some suitable generator, fed the center as res, picks an individual with the property at each alternative.
Equations
- Pearson2015.sayDeRe cover alts P x w dom = ∃ (G : Pearson2015.ConceptGenerator W E), Pearson2015.Suitable cover alts G x w dom ∧ ∀ (p : Pearson2015.Centered W E), p ∈ alts → P (G p.2 p) p.1
Instances For
On the de re denotation for a name res (79), the generator is fed the fixed individual res
rather than the center.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
General consequences #
The de se reading is the de re reading through the self concept. When the self concept is in the holder's cover and every res in the domain is the holder or one of her epistemic alternatives, the de se reading entails the de re reading.
A de re claim about a res in the domain needs a concept in the cover that reliably returns it, the res itself in the actual world, or the holder if the res is one of her epistemic alternatives.
Scenario 1: the de se / de re ambiguity (75), §5.3 #
John has found an old paper he wrote but does not recognize as his own; impressed, he says "Whoever wrote this is clever". John be yè le cleva, 'John said that yè was clever', is judged true, yet John never self-ascribes cleverness.
The worlds are the actual world and John's say-alternative.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Wld = Fin 2
Instances For
The individuals are John and the author John takes to be someone else.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Ind = Fin 2
Instances For
John's single say-alternative is the belief world centered on John.
Equations
Instances For
The res domain holds the attitude holder alone.
Equations
Instances For
In the belief world the author is clever and John is not.
Equations
- Pearson2015.cleverP y w = (w = Pearson2015.bel ∧ y = Pearson2015.auth)
Instances For
Equations
- Pearson2015.instDecidableRelIndWldCleverP x✝¹ x✝ = { decide := decide (x✝ = Pearson2015.bel) && decide (x✝¹ = Pearson2015.auth), reflects_decide := ⋯ }
The concept "the author of the paper" returns John in the actual world and the believed author in John's belief world.
Equations
- Pearson2015.authorConcept p = if p.1 = Pearson2015.actual then Pearson2015.john else Pearson2015.auth
The generator carrying the author concept for every res.
Equations
John's cover holds the author concept alone.
Equations
Instances For
The de se reading is false, since at John's alternative the center, John, is not clever.
Scenario 2: the Napoleon contrast (80) to (85), §6 #
John believes he is Napoleon; watching a report he does not recognize himself and says the patient he sees is delusional. John claims he is delusional, with yè read de re, is true; John claims Napoleon is delusional is false, though John believes he is Napoleon: the bound pronoun ranges over John's epistemic alternatives and is overwritten with John, whom he identifies through the in-cover "patient on television" concept, while the name denotes the actual Napoleon, to whom John bears no acquaintance.
The worlds are the actual world and John's claim-alternative.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Napoleon.Wld = Fin 2
Instances For
The individuals are John, the patient John sees on television, and Napoleon.
Equations
- Pearson2015.Napoleon.Ind = Fin 3
Instances For
John's claim-alternative is the belief world centered on John.
Instances For
In the belief world the patient is delusional.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- Pearson2015.Napoleon.instDecidableRelIndWldDelusionalP x✝¹ x✝ = { decide := decide (x✝ = Pearson2015.Napoleon.belN) && decide (x✝¹ = Pearson2015.Napoleon.patient), reflects_decide := ⋯ }
The concept "the patient I saw on television" returns John in the actual world and the patient in John's belief world.
Equations
Instances For
The generator carrying the patient concept for every res.
Instances For
John's cover holds the patient concept alone, so no concept in it returns the actual Napoleon.
Instances For
John claims he is delusional is true de re, since the center, John, fed to the patient generator, is the delusional patient at the alternative.
John claims Napoleon is delusional is false, since the only concept in John's cover returns John, not Napoleon, in the actual world, and Napoleon is not an epistemic alternative of John.